Literature DB >> 30554205

Recent Incidence Trend of Surgically Resected Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma and Microsatellite Instability Status in Japanese Patients.

Yu Imamura1,2, Masayuki Watanabe3, Tasuku Toihata3,4, Manabu Takamatsu5, Hiroshi Kawachi5, Ikumi Haraguchi6, Yoko Ogata4, Naoya Yoshida4, Hiroshi Saeki7, Eiji Oki7, Kenichi Taguchi8, Manabu Yamamoto9, Masaru Morita9, Shinji Mine3, Naoki Hiki3, Hideo Baba4, Takeshi Sano3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence trend of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma in Japan has not been sufficiently investigated. Little is known about the microsatellite instability (MSI) status of this tumor.
SUMMARY: Previously published studies analyzing the trend of EGJ adenocarcinoma in Japan were reviewed. And a trend of surgically resected cases (Siewert type I-III) utilizing a retrospective multicenter cohort of 379 patients from 4 academic institutions in Japan investigated. Although an increasing trend in the last 2 reports was considered controversial, our cohort demonstrated a growing number of EGJ adenocarcinoma cases between 2006 and 2013. This trend was evident, especially in Siewert type I cases. In the previous 16 studies that performed MSI testing, MSI-high tumors ranged 0-8.3%, though there were no fixed microsatellite markers on EGJ adenocarcinoma. In a recent comprehensive genetic analysis by The Cancer Genome Atlas, MSI testing using the following 7 markers, BAT25, BAT26, BAT40, D2S123, D5S346, D17S250 and TGFR-II showed a favorable correlation with hypermutated tumors. We performed MSI testing using 6 of those markers, except TGFR-II, on 206 cases from one institution, and detected 15 cases (7.3%) with MSI-high. The prevalence of MSI-high was 0% in Siewert type I, 7.6% in type II, and 16.7% in type III. Key message: The number of surgically resected EGJ adenocarcinoma cases gradually increased, and MSI-high was infrequent in Siewert type I-II tumors in our Japanese cohort. Considering MSI-high as a predictive biomarker for emerging immune checkpoint inhibitors, MSI status is becoming more beneficial in EGJ adenocarcinoma.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett’s esophagus; Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Esophagogastric junction; Microsatellite instability; Molecular subtype

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30554205     DOI: 10.1159/000494406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digestion        ISSN: 0012-2823            Impact factor:   3.216


  14 in total

1.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett's oesophagus in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Mimi C Tan; Nabil Mansour; Donna L White; Amy Sisson; Hashem B El-Serag; Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Side-overlap esophagogastric tube (SO-EG) reconstruction after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy or laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Hisahiro Hosogi; Masazumi Sakaguchi; Daisuke Yagi; Ryohei Onishi; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Yoshiharu Sakai; Seiichiro Kanaya
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Survival outcomes of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: a retrospective cohort study using the SEER database.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Xingyu Feng; Yong Li; Juan Yan; Zhilin Zhang; Xiao Song
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-02

4.  Nomograms for Predicting Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Siewert Type II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy and Radical Surgery.

Authors:  Zhenjiang Guo; Honghai Guo; Yuan Tian; Ze Zhang; Qun Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Distribution of lymph node metastases in locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (cT2-4): comparison between Siewert type I and selected Siewert type II tumors.

Authors:  Akio Sakaki; Jun Kanamori; Koshiro Ishiyama; Daisuke Kurita; Junya Oguma; Hiroyuki Daiko
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Current surgical treatment of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shun Zhang; Hajime Orita; Tetsu Fukunaga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08-15

7.  Single-institute comparison of the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and stomach adenocarscinoma in a metastatic setting.

Authors:  Izuma Nakayama; Daisuke Takahari; Takeru Wakatsuki; Hiroki Osumi; Keisho Chin; Mariko Ogura; Taro Sato; Takeshi Suzuki; Daisaku Kamiimabeppu; Akira Ooki; Mitsukuni Suenaga; Eiji Shinozaki; Kensei Yamaguchi
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-04

Review 8.  Management of Non-Colorectal Digestive Cancers with Microsatellite Instability.

Authors:  Mojun Zhu; Zhaohui Jin; Joleen M Hubbard
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Short-Term Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Siewert Type II and III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Authors:  Qing Feng; Du Long; Ming-Shan Du; Xiao-Song Wang; Zhen-Shun Li; Yong-Liang Zhao; Feng Qian; Yan Wen; Pei-Wu Yu; Yan Shi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Analysis of N6-Methyladenosine Methylome in Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction.

Authors:  Jia-Bin Huang; Bin-Bin Hu; Rong He; Lian He; Chen Zou; Chang-Feng Man; Yu Fan
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.