Literature DB >> 30554187

Prospective clinical validation of a meningioma consistency grading scheme: association with surgical outcomes and extent of tumor resection.

Kyohei Itamura, Ki-Eun Chang, Joshua Lucas, Daniel A Donoho, Steven Giannotta, Gabriel Zada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVEThe present study aims to assess the clinical utility of a previously validated intraoperative meningioma consistency grading scale and its association with extent of resection (EOR) and various surgical outcomes.METHODSThe previously validated grading system was prospectively assessed in 127 consecutive patients undergoing open craniotomy for meningioma by multiple neurosurgeons at two high-volume academic hospitals from 2013 to 2016. Consistency grading scores ranging from 1 (soft) to 5 (firm/calcified) were retrospectively analyzed to test for association with surgical outcomes and EOR, categorized as gross-total resection (GTR) or subtotal resection, defined by postoperative MRI.RESULTSOne hundred twenty-seven patients were included in the analysis with a tumor consistency distribution as follows: grade 1, 3.1%; grade 2, 14.2%; grade 3, 44.1%; grade 4, 32.3%; and grade 5, 6.3%. The mean tumor diameter was 3.6 ± 1.7 cm. Tumor consistency grades were grouped into soft (grades 1 and 2), average (grade 3), and firm (grades 4 and 5) groups for statistical analysis with distributions of 17.3%, 44.1%, and 38.6%, respectively. There was no association between meningioma consistency and maximal tumor diameter, or location. Mean duration of surgery was longer for tumors with higher consistency: grades 1 and 2, 186 minutes; grade 3, 219 minutes; and grades 4 and 5, 299 minutes (p = 0.000028). There was a trend toward higher perioperative complication rates for tumors of increased consistency: grades 1 and 2, 4.5%; grade 3, 7.0%; and grades 4 and 5, 20.8% (p = 0.047). The proportion of GTR for each consistency group was as follows: grades 1 and 2, 77%; grade 3, 68%; and grades 4 and 5, 43% (p = 0.0062).CONCLUSIONSIn addition to other important meningioma characteristics such as invasiveness, tumor consistency is a key determinant of surgical outcomes, including operative duration and EOR. Future studies predicting tumor consistency based on preoperative neuroimaging will help considerably with preoperative planning for meningiomas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EOR = extent of resection; GTR = gross-total resection; USC = University of Southern California; clinical validation; consistency; extent of resection; grading scale; meningioma; oncology

Year:  2018        PMID: 30554187     DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS1838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  4 in total

Review 1.  REVIEW: MR elastography of brain tumors.

Authors:  Adomas Bunevicius; Katharina Schregel; Ralph Sinkus; Alexandra Golby; Samuel Patz
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 2.  Identification and Management of Aggressive Meningiomas.

Authors:  Bhuvic Patel; Rupen Desai; Sangami Pugazenthi; Omar H Butt; Jiayi Huang; Albert H Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Advanced Neuroimaging Approaches to Pediatric Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Rahul M Nikam; Xuyi Yue; Gurcharanjeet Kaur; Vinay Kandula; Abdulhafeez Khair; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Lauren W Averill; Sigrid A Langhans
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Preoperative Prediction of Meningioma Consistency via Machine Learning-Based Radiomics.

Authors:  Yixuan Zhai; Dixiang Song; Fengdong Yang; Yiming Wang; Xin Jia; Shuxin Wei; Wenbin Mao; Yake Xue; Xinting Wei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.