Literature DB >> 30554156

Use of Consensus Methodology to Determine Candidate Items for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria.

Sindhu R Johnson1,2, Dinesh Khanna3,4, David Daikh3,4, Ricard Cervera3,4, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau3,4, Dafna D Gladman3,4, Bevra H Hahn3,4, Falk Hiepe3,4, Jorge Sánchez-Guerrero3,4, Elena Massarotti3,4, Dimitrios T Boumpas3,4, Karen H Costenbader3,4, David Jayne3,4, Thomas Dörner3,4, Diane L Kamen3,4, Marta Mosca3,4, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman3,4, Josef S Smolen3,4, David Wofsy3,4, Martin Aringer3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Given the complexity and heterogeneity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), high-performing classification criteria are critical to advancing research and clinical care. A collaborative effort by the European League Against Rheumatism and the American College of Rheumatology was undertaken to generate candidate criteria, and then to reduce them to a smaller set. The objective of the current study was to select a set of criteria that maximizes the likelihood of accurate classification of SLE, particularly early disease.
METHODS: An independent panel of international SLE experts and the SLE classification criteria steering committee (conducting SLE research in Canada, Mexico, United States, Austria, Germany, Greece, France, Italy, and Spain) ranked 43 candidate criteria. A consensus meeting using nominal group technique (NGT) was conducted to reduce the list of criteria for consideration.
RESULTS: The expert panel NGT exercise reduced the candidate criteria for SLE classification from 43 to 21. The panel distinguished potential "entry criteria," which would be required for classification, from potential "additive criteria." Potential entry criteria were antinuclear antibody (ANA) ≥ 1:80 (HEp-2 immunofluorescence), and low C3 and/or low C4. The use of low complement as an entry criterion was considered potentially useful in cases with negative ANA. Potential additive criteria included lupus nephritis by renal biopsy, autoantibodies, cytopenias, acute and chronic cutaneous lupus, alopecia, arthritis, serositis, oral mucosal lesions, central nervous system manifestations, and fever.
CONCLUSION: The NGT exercise resulted in 21 candidate SLE classification criteria. The next phases of SLE classification criteria development will require refinement of criteria definitions, evaluation of the ability to cluster criteria into domains, and evaluation of weighting of criteria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA; CONSENSUS METHODS; NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

Year:  2018        PMID: 30554156     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  10 in total

1.  Multicriteria decision analysis process to develop new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Sara K Tedeschi; Sindhu R Johnson; Dimitrios T Boumpas; David Daikh; Thomas Dörner; Betty Diamond; Søren Jacobsen; David Jayne; Diane L Kamen; W Joseph McCune; Marta Mosca; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza; Matthias Schneider; Murray Urowitz; David Wofsy; Josef S Smolen; Raymond P Naden; Martin Aringer; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for IgG4-related disease: an update for radiologists.

Authors:  Hainan Ren; Naoko Mori; Satoko Sato; Shunji Mugikura; Atsushi Masamune; Kei Takase
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  New classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Martin Aringer; Michelle Petri
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Performance of the proposed ACR-EULAR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a cohort of patients with SLE with neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Authors:  Maka Gegenava; Hannelore Jacqueline Lucia Beaart; Rory Caitlin Monahan; Elisabeth Brilman; Liesbeth J J Beaart-van de Voorde; Cesar Magro-Checa; Tom W J Huizinga; Gerda M Steup-Beekman
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-06-05

Review 5.  New Criteria for Lupus.

Authors:  Martin Aringer; Nicolai Leuchten; Sindhu R Johnson
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Classifying and diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus in the 21st century.

Authors:  Martin Aringer; Sindhu R Johnson
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  SLE classification criteria: Science-based icons or algorithmic distractions - an intellectually demanding dilemma.

Authors:  Ole Petter Rekvig
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 8.786

8.  2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Martin Aringer; Karen Costenbader; David Daikh; Ralph Brinks; Marta Mosca; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman; Josef S Smolen; David Wofsy; Dimitrios T Boumpas; Diane L Kamen; David Jayne; Ricard Cervera; Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau; Betty Diamond; Dafna D Gladman; Bevra Hahn; Falk Hiepe; Søren Jacobsen; Dinesh Khanna; Kirsten Lerstrøm; Elena Massarotti; Joseph McCune; Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza; Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero; Matthias Schneider; Murray Urowitz; George Bertsias; Bimba F Hoyer; Nicolai Leuchten; Chiara Tani; Sara K Tedeschi; Zahi Touma; Gabriela Schmajuk; Branimir Anic; Florence Assan; Tak Mao Chan; Ann Elaine Clarke; Mary K Crow; László Czirják; Andrea Doria; Winfried Graninger; Bernadett Halda-Kiss; Sarfaraz Hasni; Peter M Izmirly; Michelle Jung; Gábor Kumánovics; Xavier Mariette; Ivan Padjen; José M Pego-Reigosa; Juanita Romero-Diaz; Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa Fernández; Raphaèle Seror; Georg H Stummvoll; Yoshiya Tanaka; Maria G Tektonidou; Carlos Vasconcelos; Edward M Vital; Daniel J Wallace; Sule Yavuz; Pier Luigi Meroni; Marvin J Fritzler; Ray Naden; Thomas Dörner; Sindhu R Johnson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 15.483

9.  Applying the 2019 EULAR/ACR lupus criteria to patients from an established cohort: a Latin American perspective.

Authors:  Guillermo J Pons-Estel; Manuel Francisco Ugarte-Gil; Guillermina B Harvey; Daniel Wojdyla; Rosana Quintana; Verónica Saurit; Enrique R Soriano; Eloisa Bonfa; Loreto Massardo; Mario Cardiel; Luis M Vila; Russell Griffin; Bernardo A Pons-Estel; Graciela S Alarcón
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2020-01

10.  Clinical and laboratory characteristics in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus across age groups.

Authors:  J S Massias; E M D Smith; E Al-Abadi; K Armon; K Bailey; C Ciurtin; J Davidson; J Gardner-Medwin; K Haslam; D P Hawley; A Leahy; V Leone; F McErlane; D Mewar; G Modgil; R Moots; C Pilkington; A V Ramanan; S Rangaraj; P Riley; A Sridhar; N Wilkinson; M W Beresford; C M Hedrich
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.911

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.