Literature DB >> 30553945

Reproducibility of diaphragmatic thickness measured by M-mode ultrasonography in healthy volunteers.

Simone Scarlata1, Damiana Mancini2, Alice Laudisio2, Antonelli Incalzi Raffaele2.   

Abstract

We aimed at testing M-mode ultrasound diaphragmatic thickness reproducibility and its clinical correlates in healthy volunteers. Sixty-six consecutive healthy volunteers were considered eligible, and enrolled in the study. During a single visit, all participants received three M-mode and B-mode ultrasound evaluations of Diaphragmatic Thickness (DT). We then proceeded to calculate the thickness difference and assess the association of ultrasonographic measurements with demographic and anthropometric data. Variables associated through univariate analyses were entered in multivariable models, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was performed in order to determine intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Intra- and inter-observer agreements showed to be excellent through Cronbach's Alpha, ranging from 0.81 - 0.91 and 0.86 - 0.92, respectively. Mean diaphragmatic thickness measurements were: 2.6 (±0.5) mm at inhalation and 1.8 (±0.4) mm at exhalation. The results we obtained significantly varied according to gender, showing diaphragmatic motion, inspiratory/expiratory thickness and fractional thickening to be significantly lower in women. Moreover, a significantly reduced expiratory diaphragmatic thickness emerged in the subgroup of subjects having a sedentary work (p = 0.045). The crude association between expiratory thickness and active work produced a B coefficient of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.04-0.38; p = 0.045), which was confirmed after adjustments considering age and sex (B = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.01- 0.39; P = 0.037). Diaphragmatic thickness measurements using M-mode are reproducible. Intra and inter-observer agreement is high enough to support the precision of this measurement and provide a further analytic tool for a wider application in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diaphragm ultrasound; Diaphragmatic thickness; Reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30553945     DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2018.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol        ISSN: 1569-9048            Impact factor:   1.931


  3 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of diaphragmatic function by ultrasonography: Current approach and perspectives.

Authors:  Alain Boussuges; Sarah Rives; Julie Finance; Fabienne Brégeon
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 2.  Ultrasound and non-ultrasound imaging techniques in the assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction.

Authors:  Franco A Laghi; Marina Saad; Hameeda Shaikh
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.317

3.  M-Mode Ultrasound Examination of Soleus Muscle in Healthy Subjects: Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability Study.

Authors:  Carlos Romero-Morales; Cesar Calvo-Lobo; Emmanuel Navarro-Flores; Victoria Mazoteras-Pardo; Paula García-Bermejo; Daniel López-López; Eva María Martínez-Jiménez; Blanca De-la-Cruz-Torres
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.