Literature DB >> 30553100

PHQ-9: One factor or two?

Luke Boothroyd1, David Dagnan2, Steven Muncer3.   

Abstract

The PHQ-9 has been found to be reliable and valid, but with both a single and two-factor structure suggested in the literature. This measure has not yet been subject to psychometric investigation using Mokken scale analysis. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Mokken analysis were performed on retrospective data from an NHS Trust. CFA found a two-factor structure was a significantly better fit; however, the factors were highly correlated. Mokken analysis suggested that a single scale was viable. The findings support recent research by Gonzalez-Blanch et al. (2018) in suggesting a one factor model is most appropriate for the PHQ-9.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30553100     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  12 in total

1.  The effects of survey mode on self-reported psychological functioning: Measurement invariance and latent mean comparison across face-to-face and web modes.

Authors:  Gaja Zager Kocjan; Darja Lavtar; Gregor Sočan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Psychological assessment of individuals with Mal de Débarquement Syndrome.

Authors:  Jeff Riley; Diamond Gleghorn; Benjamin C Doudican; Yoon-Hee Cha
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for Detecting Depression Among Pregnant Women in Lima, Peru.

Authors:  Meghan L Smith; Sixto E Sanchez; Marta Rondon; Jaimie L Gradus; Bizu Gelaye
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 as a Screening Tool for Depression Among Ecuadorian College Students.

Authors:  Víctor Manuel López-Guerra; Carla López-Núñez; Silvia L Vaca-Gallegos; Pablo V Torres-Carrión
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-29

5.  Factor structure, measurement invariance, and concurrent validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale-7 in a Norwegian psychiatric outpatient sample.

Authors:  Martin Brattmyr; Martin Schevik Lindberg; Stian Solem; Odin Hjemdal; Audun Havnen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.144

6.  Validation of brief screening measures for depression and anxiety in young people with substance use disorders.

Authors:  Kate H Bentley; Hitoshi Sakurai; Kelsey L Lowman; Lisa Rines-Toth; James McKowen; Paola Pedrelli; A Eden Evins; Amy M Yule
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Study protocol for the online adaptation and evaluation of the 'Reboot' (Recovery-boosting) coaching programme, to prepare critical care nurses for, and aid recovery after, stressful clinical events.

Authors:  K S Vogt; A Grange; J Johnson; J Marran; L Budworth; R Coleman; R Simms-Ellis
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-03-17

8.  Evaluating the Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native Adults and Diverse Racial and Ethnic Groups.

Authors:  Melissa L Harry; R Yates Coley; Stephen C Waring; Gregory E Simon
Journal:  J Affect Disord Rep       Date:  2021-02-22

9.  Patient-reported anxiety and depression measures for use in Indian head and neck cancer populations: a psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Chindhu Shunmugasundaram; Haryana M Dhillon; Phyllis N Butow; Puma Sundaresan; Mahati Chittem; Niveditha Akula; Surendran Veeraiah; Claudia Rutherford
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-06-07

10.  PROMIS® General Life Satisfaction scale: construct validity in musculoskeletal pain patients.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan; Jane Mulcahy; Kylie Fitzgerald
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.