Nicholas Dietz1, Mayur Sharma1, Ahmad Alhourani1, Beatrice Ugiliweneza1, Dengzhi Wang1, Miriam A Nuño2, Doniel Drazin3, Maxwell Boakye4. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA. 2. Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA. 3. Evergreen Hospital Neuroscience Institute, Kirkland, Washington, USA. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA. Electronic address: Maxwell.boakye@ulp.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bundled payments offer a lump sum for management of particular conditions over a specified period that has the potential to reduce health care payments. In addition, bundled payments represent a shift toward patient-centered reimbursement, which has the upside of improved care coordination among providers and may lead to improved outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To review the challenges and sources of payment variation and opportunities for restructuring bundled payments plans in the context of spine surgery. METHODS: We reviewed episodes of care over the past 10 years. We completed a search using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design) model in PubMed and Ovid databases to identify studies that met our search criteria. RESULTS: Ten studies met the search criteria, which were retrospective in design. The primary recipient of reimbursement was the hospital associated with the index procedure (59.7%-77% of the bundled payment), followed by surgeon reimbursement (12.8%-14%) and post-acute care rehabilitation (3.6%-7.3%). On average, the index hospitalization was $32,467, ranging from $11,880 to $107,642, depending on number of levels fused, complications, and malignancy. Readmission was shown to increase the 90-day payment by 50%-200% for uncomplicated fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of spine surgery in bundled payment models offers opportunity for health care cost reduction. Patient heterogeneity, complications, and index hospitalization pricing are among factors that contribute to the challenge of payment variation. Development of standard care pathways, multidisciplinary coordination between inpatient and outpatient postoperative care, and empowerment of patients are also key elements of progress in the evolution of bundled payments in spine surgery. We anticipate more individualized risk-adjusted prediction models of payment for spine surgery, contributing to more manageable variation in payment and favorable models of bundled payments for payers and providers.
BACKGROUND: Bundled payments offer a lump sum for management of particular conditions over a specified period that has the potential to reduce health care payments. In addition, bundled payments represent a shift toward patient-centered reimbursement, which has the upside of improved care coordination among providers and may lead to improved outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To review the challenges and sources of payment variation and opportunities for restructuring bundled payments plans in the context of spine surgery. METHODS: We reviewed episodes of care over the past 10 years. We completed a search using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design) model in PubMed and Ovid databases to identify studies that met our search criteria. RESULTS: Ten studies met the search criteria, which were retrospective in design. The primary recipient of reimbursement was the hospital associated with the index procedure (59.7%-77% of the bundled payment), followed by surgeon reimbursement (12.8%-14%) and post-acute care rehabilitation (3.6%-7.3%). On average, the index hospitalization was $32,467, ranging from $11,880 to $107,642, depending on number of levels fused, complications, and malignancy. Readmission was shown to increase the 90-day payment by 50%-200% for uncomplicated fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of spine surgery in bundled payment models offers opportunity for health care cost reduction. Patient heterogeneity, complications, and index hospitalization pricing are among factors that contribute to the challenge of payment variation. Development of standard care pathways, multidisciplinary coordination between inpatient and outpatient postoperative care, and empowerment of patients are also key elements of progress in the evolution of bundled payments in spine surgery. We anticipate more individualized risk-adjusted prediction models of payment for spine surgery, contributing to more manageable variation in payment and favorable models of bundled payments for payers and providers.
Authors: Jeffrey L Gum; Breton Line; Leah Y Carreon; Richard A Hostin; Samrat Yeramaneni; Steven D Glassman; Douglas L Burton; Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Peter G Passias; Virginie Lafage; Christopher P Ames; R Shay Bess Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2021-09-01
Authors: Nicholas Dietz; Mayur Sharma; Kevin John; Dengzhi Wang; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Sriprakash Mokshagundam; Martin F Bjurström; Maxwell Boakye; Brian J Williams; Norberto Andaluz Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2021-12-16
Authors: Katherine E Pierce; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Sara Naessig; Waleed Ahmad; Shaleen Vira; Carl Paulino; Michael Gerling; Peter G Passias Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2021-12
Authors: Thompson Zhuang; Austin Y Feng; Lauren M Shapiro; Serena S Hu; Michael Gardner; Robin N Kamal Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Thompson Zhuang; Seul Ku; Lauren M Shapiro; Serena S Hu; Akaila Cabell; Robin N Kamal Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 6.558
Authors: Charlan D Kroelinger; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Keriann Uesugi; Lisa Romero; Olivia R Sappenfield; Julia F Howland; Shanna Cox Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2021-10-01