Literature DB >> 30552899

Receptor- and store-operated mechanisms of calcium entry during the nanosecond electric pulse-induced cellular response.

Gleb P Tolstykh1, Jody C Cantu2, Melissa Tarango2, Bennett L Ibey3.   

Abstract

Nanosecond electric pulses have been shown to open nanopores in the cell plasma membrane by fluorescent imaging of calcium uptake and fluorescent dyes, including propidium (Pr) iodide and YO-PRO-1 (YP1). Recently, we demonstrated that nsEPs also induce the phosphoinositide intracellular signaling cascade by phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) depletion resulting in physiological responses similar to those observed following stimulation of Gq11-coupled receptors. In this paper, we explore the role of receptor- and store-operated calcium entry (ROCE/SOCE) mechanisms in the observed response of cells to nsEP. We show that addition of the ROCE/SOCE and transient receptor potential channel (TRPC) blocker gadolinium (Gd3+, 300 μM) slows PIP2 depletion following 1 and 20 nsEP exposures. Lipid rafts, regions of the plasma membrane rich in PIP2 and TRPC, are also disrupted by nsEP exposure suggesting that ROCE/SOCE mechanisms are likely impacted. Reducing the expression of stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) protein, a key protein in ROCE and SOCE, in cells exposure to nsEP resulted in a reduction in induced intracellular calcium rise. Additionally, after exposure to 1 and 20 nsEPs (16.2 kV/cm, 5 Hz), intracellular calcium rises were significantly reduced by the addition of GD3+ and SKF-96365 (1-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-[3-(4-methoxyphenyl) propoxy] ethyl-1H-imidazole hydrochloride, 100 μM), a blocker of STIM1 interaction. However, using similar nsEP exposure parameters, SKF-96365 was less effective at reducing YP1 uptake compared to Gd3+. Thus, it is possible that SKF-96365 could block STIM1 interactions within the cell, while Gd3+ could acts on TRPC/nanopores from outside of the cell. Our results present evidence of nsEP induces ROCE and SOCE mechanisms and demonstrate that YP1 and Ca2+ cannot be used solely as markers of nsEP-induced nanoporation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ca(2+); Nanopores; Propidium iodide; ROCE; SOCE; STIM1; TRPC; Yo-Pro-1; nsEPs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30552899     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr        ISSN: 0005-2736            Impact factor:   3.747


  4 in total

1.  Caveolin-1 is Involved in Regulating the Biological Response of Cells to Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields.

Authors:  Jody C Cantu; Gleb P Tolstykh; Melissa Tarango; Hope T Beier; Bennett L Ibey
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Probing Nanoelectroporation and Resealing of the Cell Membrane by the Entry of Ca2+ and Ba2+ Ions.

Authors:  Wenfei Bo; Mantas Silkunas; Uma Mangalanathan; Vitalij Novickij; Maura Casciola; Iurii Semenov; Shu Xiao; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field Only Transiently Affects the Cellular and Molecular Processes of Leydig Cells.

Authors:  Wiktoria Kasprzycka; Alicja Trębińska-Stryjewska; Rafał Bogdan Lewandowski; Małgorzata Stępińska; Paulina Natalia Osuchowska; Monika Dobrzyńska; Yahia Achour; Łukasz Paweł Osuchowski; Jacek Starzyński; Zygmunt Mierczyk; Elżbieta Anna Trafny
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Mechanisms Underlying Dichotomous Procoagulant COAT Platelet Generation-A Conceptual Review Summarizing Current Knowledge.

Authors:  Lucas Veuthey; Alessandro Aliotta; Debora Bertaggia Calderara; Cindy Pereira Portela; Lorenzo Alberio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.