Literature DB >> 30551336

Validity of a two-item screen for early psychosis.

Peter L Phalen1, Pamela Rakhshan Rouhakhtar2, Zachary B Millman2, Elizabeth Thompson3, Jordan DeVylder4, Vijay Mittal5, Evan Carter6, Gloria Reeves7, Jason Schiffman8.   

Abstract

Well-validated screening tools have been developed to identify people at high risk for psychosis, but these are rarely used outside of specialty clinics or research settings. The development of extremely brief and simple screening tools could increase dissemination, especially in settings with low buy-in such as those with low base rates of psychosis and/or time constraints. We sought to identify such a brief measure by modeling participant responses to three psychosis screening questionnaires (Prime Screen; Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief; Youth Psychosis At Risk Questionnaire) in a sample of 139 help-seeking individuals and 335 college students (age range: 12-25). Two screening questions with especially strong information characteristics were identified: "Do you see things that others can't or don't see?" and "Have you ever felt that someone was playing with your mind?" (Alternative two-item screens with similarly strong properties were also identified and validated using uncertainty quantified through Bayesian modeling.) The resulting measure was validated against clinician ratings of psychosis. The screen performed with a sensitivity of 53% and specificity 98% for clinically significant hallucinations or delusions, and sensitivity of 32% and specificity 99% for identifying people in an early phase of psychosis (clinical high risk or first episode psychosis).
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30551336      PMCID: PMC6296822          DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  16 in total

1.  Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02

2.  Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability.

Authors:  Tandy J Miller; Thomas H McGlashan; Joanna L Rosen; Kristen Cadenhead; Tyrone Cannon; Joseph Ventura; William McFarlane; Diana O Perkins; Godfrey D Pearlson; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Screening for prodromal adolescents in an isolated high-risk population.

Authors:  Lisa M Ord; Marina Myles-Worsley; Francisca Blailes; Hilda Ngiralmau
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Psychosis-like experiences and distress among adolescents using mental health services.

Authors:  Emily Kline; Elizabeth Thompson; Kristin Bussell; Steven C Pitts; Gloria Reeves; Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Considerations for the development and implementation of brief screening tools in the identification of early psychosis.

Authors:  Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Psychosis risk screening in youth: a validation study of three self-report measures of attenuated psychosis symptoms.

Authors:  Emily Kline; Camille Wilson; Sabrina Ereshefsky; Danielle Denenny; Elizabeth Thompson; Steven C Pitts; Kristin Bussell; Gloria Reeves; Jason Schiffman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Acceptability of Psychosis Screening and Factors Affecting Its Implementation: Interviews With Community Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Mark Savill; Haley V Skymba; J Daniel Ragland; Tara Niendam; Rachel L Loewy; Tyler A Lesh; Cameron Carter; Howard H Goldman
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  An updated and conservative systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence on psychotic experiences in children and adults: on the pathway from proneness to persistence to dimensional expression across mental disorders.

Authors:  R J Linscott; J van Os
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Towards a Standard Psychometric Diagnostic Interview for Subjects at Ultra High Risk of Psychosis: CAARMS versus SIPS.

Authors:  P Fusar-Poli; M Cappucciati; G Rutigliano; T Y Lee; Q Beverly; I Bonoldi; J Lelli; S J Kaar; E Gago; M Rocchetti; R Patel; V Bhavsar; S Tognin; S Badger; M Calem; K Lim; J S Kwon; J Perez; P McGuire
Journal:  Psychiatry J       Date:  2016-05-30
View more
  4 in total

1.  An item response theory analysis of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Child Version: Developing a screening form that informs understanding of self-reported psychotic-like experiences in childhood.

Authors:  Nicole R Karcher; Michael T Perino; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 2.  Patient and Provider Insights into the Impact of Multiple Sclerosis on Mental Health: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Bryan E Davis; Lynsey Lakin; Cherie C Binns; Keisha M Currie; Mary R Rensel
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2021-04-20

3.  The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-Positive scale (CAPE-P15) accurately classifies and differentiates psychotic experience levels in adolescents from the general population.

Authors:  D Núñez; M I Godoy; J Gaete; M J Faúndez; S Campos; A Fresno; R Spencer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Scott W Woods; Georgia Drymonitou; Héctor de Diego; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-11-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.