Literature DB >> 30551173

A decision tree-based integrated testing strategy for tailor-made carcinogenicity evaluation of test substances using genotoxicity test results and chemical spaces.

Yurika Fujita1, Hiroshi Honda1, Masayuki Yamane1, Takeshi Morita2, Tomonari Matsuda3, Osamu Morita1.   

Abstract

Genotoxicity evaluation has been widely used to estimate the carcinogenicity of test substances during safety evaluation. However, the latest strategies using genotoxicity tests give more weight to sensitivity; therefore, their accuracy has been very low. For precise carcinogenicity evaluation, we attempted to establish an integrated testing strategy for the tailor-made carcinogenicity evaluation of test materials, considering the relationships among genotoxicity test results (Ames, in vitro mammalian genotoxicity and in vivo micronucleus), carcinogenicity test results and chemical properties (molecular weight, logKow and 179 organic functional groups). By analyzing the toxicological information and chemical properties of 230 chemicals, including 184 carcinogens in the Carcinogenicity Genotoxicity eXperience database, a decision tree for carcinogenicity evaluation was optimised statistically. A decision forest model was generated using a machine-learning method-random forest-which comprises thousands of decision trees. As a result, balanced accuracies in cross-validation of the optimised decision tree and decision forest model, considering chemical space (71.5% and 75.5%, respectively), were higher than balanced accuracy of an example regulatory decision tree (54.1%). Moreover, the statistical optimisation of tree-based models revealed significant organic functional groups that would cause false prediction in standard genotoxicity tests and non-genotoxic carcinogenicity (e.g., organic amide and thioamide, saturated heterocyclic fragment and aryl halide). In vitro genotoxicity tests were the most important parameters in all models, even when in silico parameters were integrated. Although external validation is required, the findings of the integrated testing strategies established herein will contribute to precise carcinogenicity evaluation and to determine new mechanistic hypotheses of carcinogenicity.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30551173     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gey039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  3 in total

Review 1.  EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database.

Authors:  Federica Madia; David Kirkland; Takeshi Morita; Paul White; David Asturiol; Raffaella Corvi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Weight of evidence approach using a TK gene mutation assay with human TK6 cells for follow-up of positive results in Ames tests: a collaborative study by MMS/JEMS.

Authors:  Manabu Yasui; Takayuki Fukuda; Akiko Ukai; Jiro Maniwa; Tadashi Imamura; Tsuneo Hashizume; Haruna Yamamoto; Kaori Shibuya; Kazunori Narumi; Yohei Fujiishi; Emiko Okada; Saori Fujishima; Mika Yamamoto; Naoko Otani; Maki Nakamura; Ryoichi Nishimura; Maya Ueda; Masayuki Mishima; Kaori Matsuzaki; Akira Takeiri; Kenji Tanaka; Yuki Okada; Munehiro Nakagawa; Shuichi Hamada; Akihiko Kajikawa; Hiroshi Honda; Jun Adachi; Kentaro Misaki; Kumiko Ogawa; Masamitsu Honma
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2021-03-06

3.  In Silico Model for Chemical-Induced Chromosomal Damages Elucidates Mode of Action and Irrelevant Positives.

Authors:  Yurika Fujita; Osamu Morita; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.