Literature DB >> 30550834

Safety and feasibility of a midseptal implantation technique of a leadless pacemaker.

Jo-Jo Hai1, Jonathan Fang2, Chor-Cheung Tam2, Chun-Ka Wong2, Ka-Chun Un2, Chung-Wah Siu2, Chu-Pak Lau2, Hung-Fat Tse3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The major risk of implanting a leadless pacemaker at the right ventricular (RV) apex is cardiac perforation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe and prospectively evaluate the safety and feasibility of a technique for midseptal implantation of the Micra leadless pacemaker.
METHODS: We positioned the device at the center of the cardiac silhouette in the right anterior oblique (RAO) view, toward the left in the left anterior oblique (LAO) view, and away from the sternum in the left lateral view.
RESULTS: Among the 51 patients (mean age 81.3 ± 9.3 years; 47% men) included in the study, 29 (57%) were >80 years old, 7 (14%) had body mass index <20 kg/m2, 48 (94%) had renal dysfunction, and 33 (65%) had valvular heart disease. The implantation sites were mid and apical septum in 46 (90%) and 5 (10%) patients, respectively. Although RAO and LAO views suggested a septal location, 9 (17.6%) devices were found to be directing at the free wall in the left lateral view and required repositioning. One patient (2%) developed cardiac perforation due to contrast injection against the RV anterior wall before verification of sheath location by lateral view. Mean R-wave sensing and pacing threshold at implantation were 9.7 ± 4.0 mV and 0.61 ± 0.31 V/0.24 ms, respectively. After median follow-up of 218.7 days, the pacing threshold remained stable.
CONCLUSION: In this high-risk patient cohort, midseptal implantation of a leadless pacemaker as guided by RAO, LAO, and left lateral views was achieved in 90% of patients, with a low risk of complications.
Copyright © 2018 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluoroscopy; Leadless pacemaker; Safety; Septal pacing; Technique

Year:  2018        PMID: 30550834     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  5 in total

Review 1.  Leadless Pacemakers: Recent and Future Developments.

Authors:  Anne Kroman; Basil Saour; Jordan M Prutkin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-09-05

2.  Assessing safety of leadless pacemaker (MICRA) at various implantation sites and its impact on paced QRS in Indian population.

Authors:  Prafull Sharma; Vivek Singh Guleria; Prashant Bharadwaj; Rajat Datta
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-08-10

3.  Pericardial effusion caused by accidently placing a Micra transcatheter pacing system into the coronary sinus.

Authors:  Xueying Chen; Jingfeng Wang; Yixiu Liang; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 4.  Efficacy and safety of leadless pacemaker: A systematic review, pooled analysis and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Darlington; Philip Brown; Vanessa Carvalho; Hayley Bourne; Joseph Mayer; Nathan Jones; Vincent Walker; Shoaib Siddiqui; Ashish Patwala; Chun Shing Kwok
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Individualized left anterior oblique projection based on pigtail catheter visualization facilitates leadless pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Kazuya Yamao; Hitoshi Hachiya; Shigeki Kusa; Naoyuki Miwa; Yoshikazu Sato; Satoshi Hara; Hiroaki Ohya; Yoshito Iesaka; Tetsuo Sasano
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-05-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.