Literature DB >> 30550327

Handshaking promotes deal-making by signaling cooperative intent.

Juliana Schroeder1, Jane L Risen2, Francesca Gino3, Michael I Norton4.   

Abstract

We examine how a simple handshake-a gesture that often occurs at the outset of social interactions-can influence deal-making. Because handshakes are social rituals, they are imbued with meaning beyond their physical features. We propose that during mixed-motive interactions, a handshake is viewed as a signal of cooperative intent, increasing people's cooperative behavior and affecting deal-making outcomes. In Studies 1a and 1b, pairs who chose to shake hands at the onset of integrative negotiations obtained better joint outcomes. Study 2 demonstrates the causal impact of handshaking using experimental methodology. Study 3 suggests a driver of the cooperative consequence of handshaking: negotiators expected partners who shook hands to behave more cooperatively than partners who avoided shaking hands or partners whose nonverbal behavior was unknown; these expectations of cooperative intent increased negotiators' own cooperation. Study 4 uses an economic game to demonstrate that handshaking increased cooperation even when handshakes were uninstructed (vs. instructed). Further demonstrating the primacy of signaling cooperative intent, handshaking actually reduced cooperation when the action signaled ill intent (e.g., when the hand-shaker was sick; Study 5). Finally, in Study 6, executives assigned to shake hands before a more antagonistic, distributive negotiation were less likely to lie about self-benefiting information, increasing cooperation even to their own detriment. Together, these studies provide evidence that handshakes, ritualistic behaviors imbued with meaning beyond mere physical contact, signal cooperative intent and promote deal-making. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30550327     DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures.

Authors:  Harry Farmer; Raqeeb Mahmood; Samantha E A Gregory; Polina Tishina; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2020-12-10

2.  Attitudes to Interpersonal Touch in the Workplace in Autistic and non-Autistic Groups.

Authors:  Tegan Penton; Natalie Bowling; Aikaterini Vafeiadou; Claudia Hammond; Geoffrey Bird; Michael J Banissy
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-09-09

3.  Women, work and pandemic: An impact study of COVID-19 lockdown on working women in India.

Authors:  Amithy Jasrotia; Jigyasa Meena
Journal:  Asian Soc Work Policy Rev       Date:  2021-09-02

4.  Guidelines for Robot-to-Human Handshake From the Movement Nuances in Human-to-Human Handshake.

Authors:  John-John Cabibihan; Ahmed El-Noamany; Abdelrahman Mohamed Ragab; Marcelo H Ang
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Four Puzzles of Reputation-Based Cooperation : Content, Process, Honesty, and Structure.

Authors:  Francesca Giardini; Daniel Balliet; Eleanor A Power; Szabolcs Számadó; Károly Takács
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2021-12-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.