Literature DB >> 3055022

[Invagination. The present status of diagnostic imaging and therapy].

C Müller-Leisse1, J Tröger.   

Abstract

The use of ultrasound techniques has brought about considerable changes in the diagnosis and therapy of intussusception in the past few years. (1) Whenever intussusception is suspected ultrasound examination of the abdomen is the diagnostic procedure of choice; a diagnosis of intussusception can be made or excluded with an adequate degree of accuracy. (2) Ultrasound monitoring is also good for the follow-up of cecal edema after reduction of intussusception, making it possible to check that there are no pathological lead points and that complete restoration of function has been achieved. (3) There are only three absolute contraindications for attempting an enema: peritonitis, shock, and perforation. (4) Whenever there are relative contraindications for administration of an enema, e.g., long duration of symptoms, complete small-bowel obstruction, it is of the utmost importance to inform the pediatrician and the surgeon and to discuss with them the potential benefits and risks involved in an attempt at hydrostatic reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3055022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  2 in total

1.  Hydrostatic reduction of intussusception under US guidance.

Authors:  W K Rohrschneider; J Tröger
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

2.  The post-reduction donut sign.

Authors:  W Rohrschneider; J Tröger; B Betsch
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.