J H Jin 1 , S X Huang 1 , Y Y Liang 1 , Z Z Cui 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Objective: Observation of the effect of uvuplopalatal flap for OSAHS patients with anterior and posterior pharyngeal stenosis. Method: Fifty-six patients with OSAHS who were mainly anterior posterior stenosis in the velopharyngeal plane were selected. Patients with suspending uvuplopalatal flap were used as observation group (30 cases). Patients with UPPP were used as control group (26 cases). The investigation and comparison of AHI, SaO₂, scars, throat foreign body sensation, pharynx desiccation, pharynx' s tightness, pharynx discomfort and surgical satisfaction were investigated at 6-8 months after the operation. Restul: At 6-8 months after operation, the AHI and SaO₂ of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before operation(P<0.01). However, there were significant differences(P<0.01) among the indexes of scar formation, throat foreign body, sensation pharynx desiccation, pharynx' s tightness, pharynx discomfort and surgical satisfaction. Conclusion: In the OSAHS patients with anterior and posterior pharyngeal stenosis, the effect of UPF was better than that of UPPP among the indexes of scar formation, pharyngeal symptoms and surgical satisfaction. Copyright© by the Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
Objective: Observation of the effect of uvuplopalatal flap for OSAHS patients with anterior and posterior pharyngeal stenosis. Method: Fifty-six patients with OSAHS who were mainly anterior posterior stenosis in the velopharyngeal plane were selected. Patients with suspending uvuplopalatal flap were used as observation group (30 cases). Patients with UPPP were used as control group (26 cases). The investigation and comparison of AHI, SaO₂, scars, throat foreign body sensation, pharynx desiccation, pharynx' s tightness , pharynx discomfort and surgical satisfaction were investigated at 6-8 months after the operation. Restul: At 6-8 months after operation, the AHI and SaO₂ of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before operation(P<0.01). However, there were significant differences(P<0.01) among the indexes of scar formation, throat foreign body, sensation pharynx desiccation, pharynx' s tightness , pharynx discomfort and surgical satisfaction. Conclusion: In the OSAHS patients with anterior and posterior pharyngeal stenosis, the effect of UPF was better than that of UPPP among the indexes of scar formation, pharyngeal symptoms and surgical satisfaction. Copyright© by the Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Keywords:
sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome,obstructive; uvulopalatopharyngoplasty; uvuplopalatal flap
Year: 2018
PMID: 30550217 DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.23.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi ISSN: 1001-1781