Literature DB >> 30550047

Sparsity-based photoacoustic image reconstruction with a linear array transducer and direct measurement of the forward model.

Ruibo Shang1, Richard Archibald2, Anne Gelb3, Geoffrey P Luke1.   

Abstract

Photoacoustic (PA) imaging is an emerging imaging technique for many clinical applications. One of the challenges posed by clinical translation is that imaging systems often rely on a finite-aperture transducer rather than a full tomography system. This results in imaging artifacts arising from an underdetermined reconstruction of the initial pressure distribution (IPD). Furthermore, clinical applications often require deep imaging, resulting in a low-signal-to-noise ratio for the acquired signal because of strong light attenuation in tissue. Conventional approaches to reconstruct the IPD, such as back projection and time-reversal, do not adequately suppress the artifacts and noise. We propose a sparsity-based optimization approach that improves the reconstruction of IPD in PA imaging with a linear array ultrasound transducer. In simulation studies, the forward model matrix was measured from k-Wave simulations, and the approach was applied to reconstruct simulated point objects and the Shepp-Logan phantom. The results were compared with the conventional back projection, time-reversal approach, frequency-domain reconstruction, and the iterative least-squares approaches. In experimental studies, the forward model of our imaging system is directly measured by scanning a graphite point source through the imaging field of view. Experimental images of graphite inclusions in tissue-mimicking phantoms are reconstructed and compared with the back projection and iterative least-squares approaches. Overall these results show that our proposed optimization approach can leverage the sparsity of the PA images to improve the reconstruction of the IPD and outperform the existing popular reconstruction approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational imaging; initial pressure distribution; photoacoustic imaging; sparsity; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30550047      PMCID: PMC6975234          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.24.3.031015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  23 in total

Review 1.  Biomedical applications of photoacoustic imaging with exogenous contrast agents.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Luke; Doug Yeager; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Compressed sensing in photoacoustic tomography in vivo.

Authors:  Zijian Guo; Changhui Li; Liang Song; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Signal-to-noise analysis of biomedical photoacoustic measurements in time and frequency domains.

Authors:  Sergey Telenkov; Andreas Mandelis
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.523

4.  Model-based correction of finite aperture effect in photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Meng-Lin Li; Yi-Chieh Tseng; Chung-Chih Cheng
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Sparsity-based acoustic inversion in cross-sectional multiscale optoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Yiyong Han; Stratis Tzoumas; Antonio Nunes; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Amir Rosenthal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  In vivo demonstration of reflection artifact reduction in photoacoustic imaging using synthetic aperture photoacoustic-guided focused ultrasound (PAFUSion).

Authors:  Mithun Kuniyil Ajith Singh; Michael Jaeger; Martin Frenz; Wiendelt Steenbergen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Overcoming the acoustic diffraction limit in photoacoustic imaging by the localization of flowing absorbers.

Authors:  Sergey Vilov; Bastien Arnal; Emmanuel Bossy
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Full-wave iterative image reconstruction in photoacoustic tomography with acoustically inhomogeneous media.

Authors:  Chao Huang; Kun Wang; Liming Nie; Lihong V Wang; Mark A Anastasio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Photoacoustic-guided focused ultrasound (PAFUSion) for identifying reflection artifacts in photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Mithun Kuniyil Ajith Singh; Wiendelt Steenbergen
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2015-09-28

10.  Acoustic Inversion in Optoacoustic Tomography: A Review.

Authors:  Amir Rosenthal; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2013-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Image reconstruction for endoscopic photoacoustic tomography including effects of detector responses.

Authors:  Zheng Sun; Huifeng Sun
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-03-01

2.  Two-step training deep learning framework for computational imaging without physics priors.

Authors:  Ruibo Shang; Kevin Hoffer-Hawlik; Fei Wang; Guohai Situ; Geoffrey P Luke
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Single laser-shot super-resolution photoacoustic tomography with fast sparsity-based reconstruction.

Authors:  David Egolf; Quinn Barber; Roger Zemp
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2021-03-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.