Literature DB >> 30549358

Randomized phase II/III confirmatory treatment selection design with a change of survival end points: Statistical design of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1216.

Qiang Ed Zhang1,2, Qian Wu3, Paul M Harari4, David I Rosenthal5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To confirm the treatment effects of concurrent cetuximab plus docetaxel observed in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0234 and single out the effect of cetuximab, we designed RTOG 1216, a randomized phase II/III study, which uses an intermediate end point to select the best regimen for definitive testing of survival benefit.
METHODS: In phase II, the best regimen should demonstrate statistically significant efficacy against the control with predefined advantage over the competing arm regarding disease-free survival (DFS). We evaluate operating characteristics of the randomized II/III group sequential design through simulations and numerical integrations under the null and various alternative hypotheses.
RESULTS: Results show the randomized II/III design yields substantial savings on sample size and time with well-controlled type I and type II error rates.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the proposed randomized II/III design has desirable properties that offer cost effectiveness, operational efficiency, and, most importantly, scientific innovation that can be considered for similar clinical research settings.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck; oncology; randomized II/III design; survival; treatment selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30549358      PMCID: PMC6587571          DOI: 10.1002/hed.25359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  11 in total

1.  Sequential designs for phase III clinical trials incorporating treatment selection.

Authors:  Nigel Stallard; Susan Todd
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Novel designs for multi-arm clinical trials with survival outcomes with an application in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Mahesh K B Parmar; Wendi Qian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Modification of the sample size and the schedule of interim analyses in survival trials based on data inspections, by H. Schäfer and H.-H. Müller, Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20: 3741-3751.

Authors:  P Bauer; M Posch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Design issues in randomized phase II/III trials.

Authors:  Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin; Jeffrey S Abrams; Susan Halabi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A group-sequential design for clinical trials with treatment selection.

Authors:  Nigel Stallard; Tim Friede
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A general inefficacy interim monitoring rule for randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn; Robert Gray
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Comparison of futility monitoring guidelines using completed phase III oncology trials.

Authors:  Qiang Zhang; Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn; Susan Halabi; Sumithra Mandrekar; James J Dignam
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 9.  A comparison of phase II study strategies.

Authors:  Sally Hunsberger; Yingdong Zhao; Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Modeling the relationship between progression-free survival and overall survival: the phase II/III trial.

Authors:  Mary W Redman; Bryan H Goldman; Michael LeBlanc; Anne Schott; Laurence H Baker
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Dose de-escalation during adjuvant chemoradiotherapy of HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: the MC1273 phase II study].

Authors:  Alexander Rühle; Nils H Nicolay
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Phase II Evaluation of Aggressive Dose De-Escalation for Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel J Ma; Katharine A Price; Eric J Moore; Samir H Patel; Michael L Hinni; Joaquin J Garcia; Darlene E Graner; Nathan R Foster; Brenda Ginos; Michelle Neben-Wittich; Yolanda I Garces; Ashish V Chintakuntlawar; Daniel L Price; Kerry D Olsen; Kathryn M Van Abel; Jan L Kasperbauer; Jeffrey R Janus; Mark Waddle; Robert Miller; Satomi Shiraishi; Robert L Foote
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Microscopic Extranodal Extension in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer and the Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Flora Yan; Hong Li; John R de Almeida; John M Kaczmar; Patrik Pipkorn; Joseph Zenga; Mary S Richardson; David M Neskey; Anand K Sharma; Terry A Day; Evan M Graboyes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.591

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.