Qiang Ed Zhang1,2, Qian Wu3, Paul M Harari4, David I Rosenthal5. 1. Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Clinical Biostatistics, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 4. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin. 5. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To confirm the treatment effects of concurrent cetuximab plus docetaxel observed in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0234 and single out the effect of cetuximab, we designed RTOG 1216, a randomized phase II/III study, which uses an intermediate end point to select the best regimen for definitive testing of survival benefit. METHODS: In phase II, the best regimen should demonstrate statistically significant efficacy against the control with predefined advantage over the competing arm regarding disease-free survival (DFS). We evaluate operating characteristics of the randomized II/III group sequential design through simulations and numerical integrations under the null and various alternative hypotheses. RESULTS: Results show the randomized II/III design yields substantial savings on sample size and time with well-controlled type I and type II error rates. CONCLUSION: Overall, the proposed randomized II/III design has desirable properties that offer cost effectiveness, operational efficiency, and, most importantly, scientific innovation that can be considered for similar clinical research settings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To confirm the treatment effects of concurrent cetuximab plus docetaxel observed in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0234 and single out the effect of cetuximab, we designed RTOG 1216, a randomized phase II/III study, which uses an intermediate end point to select the best regimen for definitive testing of survival benefit. METHODS: In phase II, the best regimen should demonstrate statistically significant efficacy against the control with predefined advantage over the competing arm regarding disease-free survival (DFS). We evaluate operating characteristics of the randomized II/III group sequential design through simulations and numerical integrations under the null and various alternative hypotheses. RESULTS: Results show the randomized II/III design yields substantial savings on sample size and time with well-controlled type I and type II error rates. CONCLUSION: Overall, the proposed randomized II/III design has desirable properties that offer cost effectiveness, operational efficiency, and, most importantly, scientific innovation that can be considered for similar clinical research settings.
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Qiang Zhang; Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn; Susan Halabi; Sumithra Mandrekar; James J Dignam Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Mary W Redman; Bryan H Goldman; Michael LeBlanc; Anne Schott; Laurence H Baker Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Daniel J Ma; Katharine A Price; Eric J Moore; Samir H Patel; Michael L Hinni; Joaquin J Garcia; Darlene E Graner; Nathan R Foster; Brenda Ginos; Michelle Neben-Wittich; Yolanda I Garces; Ashish V Chintakuntlawar; Daniel L Price; Kerry D Olsen; Kathryn M Van Abel; Jan L Kasperbauer; Jeffrey R Janus; Mark Waddle; Robert Miller; Satomi Shiraishi; Robert L Foote Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Flora Yan; Hong Li; John R de Almeida; John M Kaczmar; Patrik Pipkorn; Joseph Zenga; Mary S Richardson; David M Neskey; Anand K Sharma; Terry A Day; Evan M Graboyes Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 5.591