Literature DB >> 30548583

Bendamustine as part of conditioning of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a phase 2 study from the GELTAMO group.

Alba M Redondo1, David Valcárcel2,3, Ana P González-Rodríguez4, María Suárez-Lledó5, José L Bello6, Miguel Canales7, Jorge Gayoso8, Mercedes Colorado9, Isidro Jarque10, Raquel Del Campo11, Reyes Arranz12, María J Terol13, José J Rifón14, María J Rodríguez15, María J Ramírez16, Nerea Castro17, Andrés Sánchez18, Javier López-Jiménez19, Santiago Montes-Moreno20, Javier Briones21, Aurelio López22, Luis Palomera23, Armando López-Guillermo5, Dolores Caballero1, Alejandro Martín1.   

Abstract

We conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bendamustine instead of BCNU (carmustine) in the BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) regimen (BendaEAM) as conditioning for autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with aggressive lymphomas. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty patients (median age 55 [28-71] years) were included. All patients (except one who died early) engrafted after a median of 11 (9-72) and 14 (4-53) days to achieve neutrophil and platelet counts of >0.5 × 109 /l and >20 × 109 /l, respectively. Non-relapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year were 3.3% and 6.7%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 67 (40-77) months, the estimated 3-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 58% and 75%, respectively. Patients in partial response at study entry had significantly worse PFS and OS than patients who underwent ASCT in complete metabolic remission, and this was the only prognostic factor associated with both PFS (Relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI} [0.12-0.56]) and OS (RR, 0.40 [95% CI 0.17-0.97]) in the multivariate analysis. BendaEAM conditioning is therefore a feasible and effective regimen in patients with aggressive lymphomas. However, patients not in complete metabolic remission at the time of transplant had poorer survival and so should be considered for alternative treatment strategies.
© 2018 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990BEAMzzm321990; aggressive lymphomas; autologous stem-cell transplantation; bendamustine; clinical trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30548583     DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  2 in total

1.  [Safety and the short-term efficacy of bendamustine in the conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma].

Authors:  L C An; Y H Liu; J Y Wang; J J Ma; J Q Xu; K M Li; R X Wei; J R Sui; X Y Feng; X Q Liu; L M Chen; X X Chu
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2022-01-14

2.  Bendamustine-EAM versus BEAM regimen in patients with mantle cell lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation in the frontline setting: a multicenter retrospective study from Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) centers.

Authors:  Thomas Hueso; Thomas Gastinne; Sylvain Garciaz; Emmanuelle Tchernonog; Caroline Delette; René-Olivier Casasnovas; Eric Durot; Roch Houot; Benoît Tessoulin; Olivier Tournilhac; Sandra Malak; Emmanuel Gyan; Luc-Matthieu Fornecker; Julie Abraham; Baptiste Delapierre; Frédéric Peyrade; Richard Lemal; Rémy Gressin; Sylvain Chantepie; Cécile Borel; Rémy Morello; Krimo Bouabdallah; Ahmad Ibrahim; Reda Bouabdallah; Steven Le Gouill; Gandhi Damaj
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.483

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.