Literature DB >> 30548194

3D Printed Microfluidic Mixers-A Comparative Study on Mixing Unit Performances.

Anton Enders1, Ina G Siller1, Katharina Urmann2, Michael R Hoffmann2, Janina Bahnemann1.   

Abstract

One of the basic operations in microfluidic systems for biological and chemical applications is the rapid mixing of different fluids. However, flow profiles in microfluidic systems are laminar, which means molecular diffusion is the only mixing effect. Therefore, mixing structures are crucial to enable more efficient mixing in shorter times. Since traditional microfabrication methods remain laborious and expensive, 3D printing has emerged as a potential alternative for the fabrication of microfluidic devices. In this work, five different passive micromixers known from literature are redesigned in comparable dimensions and manufactured using high-definition MultiJet 3D printing. Their mixing performance is evaluated experimentally, using sodium hydroxide and phenolphthalein solutions, and numerically via computational fluid dynamics. Both experimental and numerical analysis results show that HC and Tesla-like mixers achieve complete mixing after 0.99 s and 0.78 s, respectively, at the highest flow rate (Reynolds number (Re) = 37.04). In comparison, Caterpillar mixers exhibit a lower mixing rate with complete mixing after 1.46 s and 1.9 s. Furthermore, the HC mixer achieves very good mixing performances over all flow rates (Re = 3.7 to 37.04), while other mixers show improved mixing only at higher flow rates.
© 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; additive manufacturing; lab on a chip; microfluidics; micromixers

Year:  2018        PMID: 30548194     DOI: 10.1002/smll.201804326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Small        ISSN: 1613-6810            Impact factor:   13.281


  13 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidics: Innovations in Materials and Their Fabrication and Functionalization.

Authors:  Jacob B Nielsen; Robert L Hanson; Haifa M Almughamsi; Chao Pang; Taylor R Fish; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Microfluidics-enabled functional 3D printing.

Authors:  H Mea; J Wan
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Development of a Custom-Made 3D Printing Protocol with Commercial Resins for Manufacturing Microfluidic Devices.

Authors:  Francesc Subirada; Roberto Paoli; Jessica Sierra-Agudelo; Anna Lagunas; Romen Rodriguez-Trujillo; Josep Samitier
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 4.  Visible-light and near-infrared fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman scattering point-of-care sensing and bio-imaging: a review.

Authors:  Yingjie Hang; Jennifer Boryczka; Nianqiang Wu
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 60.615

5.  Three-Dimensional Large-Scale Fused Silica Microfluidic Chips Enabled by Hybrid Laser Microfabrication for Continuous-Flow UV Photochemical Synthesis.

Authors:  Aodong Zhang; Jian Xu; Yucen Li; Ming Hu; Zijie Lin; Yunpeng Song; Jia Qi; Wei Chen; Zhaoxiang Liu; Ya Cheng
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.523

6.  Automated calibration of 3D-printed microfluidic devices based on computer vision.

Authors:  Junchao Wang; Kaicong Liang; Naiyin Zhang; Hailong Yao; Tsung-Yi Ho; Lingling Sun
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  One-step enzyme kinetics measurement in 3D printed microfluidics devices based on a high-performance single vibrating sharp-tip mixer.

Authors:  Xiaojun Li; Ziyi He; Chong Li; Peng Li
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 6.911

8.  3D-printed microfluidics integrated with optical nanostructured porous aptasensors for protein detection.

Authors:  Sofia Arshavsky-Graham; Anton Enders; Shanny Ackerman; Janina Bahnemann; Ester Segal
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 5.833

9.  3D-printed micro bubble column reactor with integrated microsensors for biotechnological applications: From design to evaluation.

Authors:  Lasse Jannis Frey; David Vorländer; Hendrik Ostsieker; Detlev Rasch; Jan-Luca Lohse; Maximilian Breitfeld; Jan-Hendrik Grosch; Gregor D Wehinger; Janina Bahnemann; Rainer Krull
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  3D-Printed Flow Cells for Aptamer-Based Impedimetric Detection of E. coli Crooks Strain.

Authors:  Ina G Siller; John-Alexander Preuss; Katharina Urmann; Michael R Hoffmann; Thomas Scheper; Janina Bahnemann
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.