Literature DB >> 30547306

The use of bisphosphonates after joint arthroplasty is associated with lower implant revision rate.

Du Hyun Ro1, Heejin Jin2, Jae-Young Park1, Myung Chul Lee1, Sungho Won2, Hyuk-Soo Han3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study hypothesized that the use of bisphosphonates (BPs) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is associated with a lower implant revision rate. This study aimed (1) to investigate the association between BP use and the revision rate of TJA and (2) to determine the relationship between the medication period and the revision rate of TJA.
METHODS: National Health Insurance Service data on surgeries, medications, diagnoses, and screenings of 50 million Koreans were reviewed. People who underwent TJA in the period from 2002 to 2012 were identified and followed until 2016. During that period, 331,660 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 56,043 patients underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). Among them, 8447 knee patients (2.5%) and 2851 hip patients (5.0%) required revision surgery due to aseptic loosening. Demographic data, the duration of BP medication, and comorbidities were identified. The rate of revision surgery according to BP medication was investigated. The extended Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the effect of the medication period.
RESULTS: The rate of TKA revision was 1.4% for BP users and 2.9% for BP non-users (p < 0.001). The THA revision rate was 2.8% and 5.3% for BP users and non-users, respectively (p < 0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) of revision was significantly lower in patients who took BP medication for more than one year (TKA HR = 0.472, 95% CI [0.350-0.637]; THA HR = 0.490, 95% CI [0.247-0.972]) compared to that in short-term users (less than 1 year).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of BPs after TJA was associated with a lower revision rate. The use of BPs for more than one year further reduced the risk of revision. Bisphosphonate use can be highly recommended to reduce the revision rate of TJA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Bisphosphonate; National registry; Revision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30547306     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5333-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence and treatment rate of osteoporosis in patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pei-Lun Xiao; Chi-Jen Hsu; Yong-Guang Ma; Ding Liu; Rong Peng; Xiang-He Xu; Hua-Ding Lu
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Wrist Hemiarthroplasty for Complex Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture in a Patient with Manifest Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Matthias Holzbauer; Leonard S Bodell; Stefan M Froschauer
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23

3.  Bisphosphonates in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of Their Use and Complications.

Authors:  Christopher L McDonald; Nicholas J Lemme; Edward J Testa; Roy Aaron; Davis A Hartnett; Eric M Cohen
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-03-15

4.  A Novel Osteoporosis Screening Protocol to Identify Orthopedic Surgery Patients for Preoperative Bone Health Optimization.

Authors:  Elliot Chang; Brian Nickel; Neil Binkley; James Bernatz; Diane Krueger; Alec Winzenried; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-06

Review 5.  Multitasking by the OC Lineage during Bone Infection: Bone Resorption, Immune Modulation, and Microbial Niche.

Authors:  Philip M Roper; Christine Shao; Deborah J Veis
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 6.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.