Literature DB >> 30547136

Editorial on: "Superion® InterSpinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-year Results".

Federico Caporlingua1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID： 30547136      PMCID： PMC6261762          DOI： 10.21037/jss.2018.08.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN： 2414-4630


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  The death of spine surgery as we know it today.

Authors:  James I Ausman
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2003-11

2.  The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments.

Authors:  E W Fritsch; J Heisel; S Rupp
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Superion Interspinous Spacer Treatment of Moderate Spinal Stenosis: 4-Year Results.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Vikas V Patel; Douglas G Orndorff; William F Lavelle; Jon E Block; Fred H Geisler
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 4.  Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Francisco M Kovacs; Gerard Urrútia; José Domingo Alarcón
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.

Authors:  Vikas V Patel; Peter G Whang; Thomas R Haley; W Daniel Bradley; Pierce D Nunley; Raphael P Davis; Larry E Miller; Jon E Block; Fred H Geisler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Is surgery more effective than non-surgical treatment for spinal stenosis, and which non-surgical treatment is more effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen May; Christine Comer
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 7.  Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gustavo C Machado; Paulo H Ferreira; Ian A Harris; Marina B Pinheiro; Bart W Koes; Maurits van Tulder; Magdalena Rzewuska; Chris G Maher; Manuela L Ferreira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Commentary on: A randomized controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (Forsth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, Frost A, Borgström F, Fritzell P, et al. N Eng J Med 2016;374:1414-23).

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-09-22

9.  Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Vikas V Patel; Douglas G Orndorff; William F Lavelle; Jon E Block; Fred H Geisler
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Lumbar stenosis surgery: Spine surgeons not insurance companies should decide when enough is better than too much.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.