| Literature DB >> 30546913 |
Gitte Blach Nielsen1, John Haugegaard1, Rika Jolie2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In practice, field evaluation of vaccine efficacy in individual herds is often based on a historical comparison of productivity data following initiation of vaccination. Being biased by time, this study design highly contrasts the more controlled, parallel-group design used for most initial vaccine efficacy studies but offers the possibility of including a larger number of animals and herds. As an important add-on to previous findings in controlled studies, the objective of this study was to evaluate the field efficacy of the ready-to-use combination vaccine Porcilis® PCV M Hyo (MSD Animal Health) by an observational historical study design using routinely generated herd productivity data.Entities:
Keywords: Historical comparison; Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae; PCV2; Vaccine efficacy
Year: 2018 PMID: 30546913 PMCID: PMC6284288 DOI: 10.1186/s40813-018-0104-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Porcine Health Manag ISSN: 2055-5660
Summary statistics concerning productivity parameters in the 20 nursery herds comparing one year before (Period 1) and one year after (Period 2) initiated vaccination with Porcilis® PCV M Hyo
| Parameter | Period | Mean | Standard deviation | Median | Min | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality (%) | Period 1 | 3.1 | 0.96 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 4.8 | 0.014 |
| Period 2 | 2.7 | 0.75 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 3.9 | ||
| Average daily weight gain (g) | Period 1 | 444 | 52 | 445 | 319 | 539 | 0.555 |
| Period 2 | 449 | 50 | 455 | 363 | 563 | ||
| Feed conversion rate (FU/kg) | Period 1 | 1.87 | 0.19 | 1.81 | 1.65 | 2.37 | 0.074 |
| Period 2 | 1.81 | 0.15 | 1.80 | 1.55 | 2.23 |
Fig. 1Changes for the 20 individual nursery herds in mortality, average daily weight gain and feed conversion rate between Period 1 and Period 2
Summary statistics concerning productivity parameters in the 23 finishing herds comparing one year before (Period 1) and one year after (Period 2) initiated vaccination with Porcilis® PCV M Hyo
| Parameter | Period | Mean | Standard deviation | Median | Min | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality (%) | Period 1 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 6.8 | 0.002 |
| Period 2 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 5.3 | ||
| Average daily weight gain (g) | Period 1 | 970 | 68 | 976 | 857 | 1112 | 0.001 |
| Period 2 | 1006 | 64 | 1008 | 899 | 1153 | ||
| Feed conversion rate (FU/kg) | Period 1 | 2.76 | 0.12 | 2.75 | 2.57 | 3.04 | 0.095 |
| Period 2 | 2.73 | 0.09 | 2.69 | 2.58 | 2.98 |
Fig. 2Changes for the 23 individual finishing herds in mortality, average daily weight gain and feed conversion rate between Period 1 and Period 2
Linear mixed model results regarding change in mortality for finishing herds
| Parameter | Linear mixed model for change in finisher herd mortality | |
|---|---|---|
| Estimates (95% C.I.) | Significance ( | |
| Intercept | −0.495 (−0.834;-0.169) | 0.012 |
| Fixed effects: | N/A | |
| Random effect: | Variance | |
| Owner | 0.153 | |
| Residual | 0.271 | |
Linear mixed model results regarding change in average daily weight gain for finishing herds
| Parameter | Linear mixed model for change in finisher herd average daily weight gain | |
|---|---|---|
| Estimates (95% C.I.) | Significance ( | |
| Intercept | 34.376 (17.763;50.988) | < 0.001 |
| Fixed effect: | ||
| Difference in arrival weight | 7.245 (1.647;12.843) | 0.020 |
| Random effect: | Variance | |
| Owner | < 0.0001 | |
| Residual | 1658 | |
Linear mixed model results regarding change in feed conversion rate for finishing herds
| Parameter | Linear mixed model for change in finisher herd feed conversion rate | |
|---|---|---|
| Estimates (95% C.I.) | Significance ( | |
| Intercept | −0.037 (−0.083;0.008) | 0.133 |
| Fixed effects: | N/A | |
| Random effect: | Variance | |
| Owner | 0.001 | |
| Residual | 0.009 | |