| Literature DB >> 30546354 |
Ali Akgul1, Seong Won Nho1, Safak Kalindamar1, Hasan C Tekedar1, Hossam Abdalhamed1, Mark L Lawrence1, Attila Karsi1.
Abstract
Edwardsiella ictaluri is an intracellular Gram-negative facultative pathogen causing enteric septicemia of catfish (ESC), a common disease resulting in substantial economic losses in the U.S. catfish industry. Previously, we demonstrated that several universal stress proteins (USPs) are highly expressed under in vitro and in vivo stress conditions, indicating their importance for E. ictaluri survival. However, the roles of these USPs in E. ictaluri virulence is not known yet. In this work, 10 usp genes of E. ictaluri were in-frame deleted and characterized in vitro and in vivo. Results show that all USP mutants were sensitive to acidic condition (pH 5.5), and EiΔusp05 and EiΔusp08 were very sensitive to oxidative stress (0.1% H2O2). Virulence studies indicated that EiΔusp05, EiΔusp07, EiΔusp08, EiΔusp09, EiΔusp10, and EiΔusp13 were attenuated significantly compared to E. ictaluri wild-type (EiWT; 20, 45, 20, 20, 55, and 10% vs. 74.1% mortality, respectively). Efficacy experiments showed that vaccination of catfish fingerlings with EiΔusp05, EiΔusp07, EiΔusp08, EiΔusp09, EiΔusp10, and EiΔusp13 provided complete protection against EiWT compared to sham-vaccinated fish (0% vs. 58.33% mortality). Our results support that USPs contribute E. ictaluri virulence in catfish.Entities:
Keywords: ESC; USP; mutation; stress; vaccine
Year: 2018 PMID: 30546354 PMCID: PMC6279896 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.
| Strain | Relevant characteristics | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 93–146 | Wild type; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| 93–146 derivative; pEI1+; pEI2+; Colr; Δ | This study | |
| CC118λ | D(ara-leu); | |
| SM10λ | ||
| BW19851λ | RP4-2 (Km::Tn7, Tc::Mu-1), DuidA3::pir+, recA1, endA1, thi-1, hsdR17, creC510 | |
| pMEG-375 | 8142 bp, Ampr, Cmr, lacZ, R6K ori, | |
| pAK | 5681 bp, PstI, EcoRI, HpaI, AseI, BstBI | |
| p | 9939 bp, Δ | This study |
| p | 9960 bp, Δ | This study |
| p | 10096 bp, Δ | This study |
| p | 10080 bp, Δ | This study |
| p | 10101 bp, Δ | This study |
| p | 10026 bp, Δ | This study |
| p | 10087 bp, Δ | This study |
| p | 9843 bp, Δ | This study |
| p | 9795 bp, Δ | This study |
| p | 9975 bp, Δ | This study |
The primers used for mutant construction and sequence validation.
| Genes | Primer ID | Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | RE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EI1751EF01 | A | cccc | ||
| EI1751IR01 | B | gaggtcgatggaaaccag | ||
| EI1751IF01 | C | |||
| EI1751ER01 | D | cccc | ||
| 1751F | acctgtgccatttccgctgcc | |||
| EI1786EF01 | A | cccc | ||
| EI1786IR01 | B | gacgggaaccaaaatcgtc | ||
| EI1786IF01 | C | |||
| EI1786ER01 | D | cccc | ||
| 1786F | gtatggcggtgataacatcc | |||
| EI1962EF01 | A | cccc | ||
| EI1962IR01 | B | gttttggttcggatcgatag | ||
| EI1962IF01 | C | |||
| EI1962ER01 | D | cccc | ||
| 1962F | tgatttgttgctcgtcggta | |||
| EI1981EF01 | A | cccc | ||
| EI1981IR01 | B | ggatccggttttaagatcaag | ||
| EI1981IF01 | C | |||
| EI1981ER01 | D | cccc | ||
| 1981F | ttaccatggcgcatttaggc | |||
| EI2616EF01 | A | cccc | ||
| EI2616IR01 | B | cagaaccagaacatggtg | ||
| EI2616IF01 | C | |||
| EI2616ER01 | D | cccc | ||
| 2616F | atatccgtcgccgtcatacc | |||
| EI2891EF01 | A | cccc | ||
| EI2891IR01 | B | ctgtgccagcagggtgtc | ||
| EI2891IF01 | C | |||
| EI2891ER01 | D | cccc | ||
| 2891F | cgtcgaggctctgattacca | |||
| EI3729EF01 | A | cccc | ||
| EI3729IR01 | B | cggagaaaggtctacagcaac | ||
| EI3729IF01 | C | |||
| EI3729ER01 | D | cccc | ||
| 3729F | gcgtttacaactgactccgg | |||
| EI3778EF01 | A | cccc | ||
| EI3778IR01 | B | ctcttcaatatcgacaggtac | ||
| EI3778IF01 | C | |||
| EI3778ER01 | D | cccc | ||
| 3778F | acaatctccggactctgtgg | |||
| Ei1634EF01 | A | at | ||
| Ei1634IR01 | B | cagatcgaggagtgtactcat | ||
| Ei1634IF01 | C | |||
| Ei1634ER01 | D | at | ||
| 1634F | ccaccgaacacactagcaata | |||
| Ei3810EF01 | A | at | ||
| Ei3810IR01 | B | ggtcagggttgcagtcttatg | ||
| Ei3810IF01 | C | |||
| Ei3810ER01 | D | at | ||
| 3810F | tcagctgtgtgggtagactg |
Summary of E. ictaluri usp genes and in-frame deletion.
| Gene | Locus ID | Gene ID | ORF size (bp) | Remaining US ORF (bp) | Remaining DS ORF (bp) | Deleted ORF (bp)/(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT01EI_1751 | 435 | 15 | 0 | 420/(97) | ||
| NT01EI_1786 | – | 432 | 8 | 6 | 418/(97) | |
| NT01EI_1962 | 960 | 28 | 6 | 926/(96) | ||
| NT01EI_1981 | 417 | 24 | 21 | 372/(89) | ||
| NT01EI_2616 | 420 | 12 | 14 | 394/(94) | ||
| NT01EI_2891 | 2709 | 30 | 9 | 2670/(99) | ||
| NT01EI_3729 | 438 | 12 | 27 | 399/(91) | ||
| NT01EI_3778 | 429 | 18 | 12 | 399/(93) | ||
| NT01EI_1634 | – | 258 | 0 | 9 | 249/(97) | |
| NT01EI_3810 | 480 | 3 | 63 | 415/(86) |
FIGURE 1Locations of studied universal stress proteins in Edwardsiella ictaluri strain 93–146 genome.
FIGURE 2Confirmation of E. ictaluri USP mutants by using forward (A) and reverse (D) primers. Fragments were amplified from mutant and wild-type strains and separated on two different 1% agarose gels, which were then combined (white lines above indicate joints). A 1 Kb+ marker lane was also added to the end. Lane 1, EiWT (usp02) and lane 2, EiΔusp02; lane 3, EiWT (usp03) and lane 4, EiΔusp03; lane 5, EiWT (usp04) and lane 6, EiΔusp04; lane 7 is EiWT (usp05) and lane 8, EiΔusp05; lane 9 is EiWT (usp06) and lane 10 is EiΔusp06; lane 11 is EiWT (usp07) and lane 12 is EiΔusp07; lane 13 is EiWT (usp08) and lane 14 is EiΔusp08; lane 15 is EiWT (usp09) and lane 16 is EiΔusp09; lane 17 is EiWT (usp10) and lane 18 is EiΔusp10; lane 19 is EiWT (usp13) and lane 20 is EiΔusp13.
FIGURE 3Growth of E. ictaluri USP mutants and WT in BHI broth. The data represent means of four replicates. EiΔusp03 and EiΔusp04 have a significantly (p < 0.001) higher growth rate than EiWT and other USP mutants, which indicated by a “∗.” No significant differences were observed in the growth kinetics of EiWT and EiΔusp02, EiΔusp05, EiΔusp06, EiΔusp07, EiΔusp08, EiΔusp09, EiΔusp10, and EiΔusp13 strains.
FIGURE 4The survival assay of E. ictaluri WT and USP mutants in pH 5.5. (A) Each strain had four replicates (column A–D). Strains start with E. ictaluri WT, EiΔusp02-13 and BHI control. (B) The bars show the difference between bioluminescence of USP mutants and WT. ∗indicates a significant difference between stress and non-stress at P < 0.01.
FIGURE 5The survival assay of E. ictaluri WT and USP mutants exposed to 0.1% H2O2. (A) Each strain had four replicates (column A–D). Strains start with E. ictaluri WT, EiΔusp02-13 and BHI control. (B) The bars show the difference between bioluminescence of USP mutants and WT. indicates a significant difference between stress and non-stress at P < 0.01.
FIGURE 6Vaccination tests of USP mutants in channel catfish fingerlings. (A) Percent mortalities seen after vaccination. (B) Percent mortalities of channel catfish fingerlings immunized with USP mutants and re-challenged with E. ictaluri wild-type 3 weeks post immunization. indicates significant differences between mutant and WT at P < 0.01.
FIGURE 7Overall summary of results. Survival percent under acidic (pH) and oxidative stress (H2O2) conditions was calculated based on changes in bioluminescence signal. The downward direction arrow indicates reduction in survival percent between mutant strain compared with wild type. The upward direction indicates increase in survival percent. Virulence percent is based on catfish mortality after immersion challenge with USP mutant strains. Efficacy perecent is based of mortality after re-challenge the immunized fish with E. ictaluri WT at 21 day post-immunization.