Literature DB >> 30546215

Antibiofilm efficacy of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles against endodontic-periodontal pathogens: An in vitro study.

Kiran R Halkai1, Rahul Halkai2, Jayashree A Mudda3, Vasundhara Shivanna4, Vandana Rathod5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endodontic-periodontal pathogens exist as biofilms which are difficult to eliminate. Biosynthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) emerged as newer antimicrobial agents with potential benefits. AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); evaluate the antibiofilm efficacy of fungal-derived AgNPs against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Bacillus pumilus, and Enterococcus faecalis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MIC of AgNPs against test pathogens was determined using micro broth dilution method. Serial dilutions of AgNPs ranging from 80 to 1 μg/ml concentration were added to wells containing 10 μl of bacterial inoculum in culture media and control group without AgNPs. For biofilm models, 120 dentin blocks were prepared, sterilized, and contaminated for 2 weeks with (n = 40 each). Group 1: B. pumilus, Group 2: E. faecalis, and Group 3: P. gingivalis and each group is divided into four subgroups (n = 10 each) and treated with distilled water, AgNPs, 2% and 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX). Colonies counted after 24 h of incubation and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests.
RESULTS: MIC for B. pumilus was determined as 20 μg/ml and 30 μg/ml for E. faecalis and P. gingivalis. AgNPs were effective as 2% CHX against all biofilms compared to control group. Post hoc Tukey test (P < 0.0001) shows no significant difference between groups.
CONCLUSION: Fungal-derived AgNPs are effective against endo-perio pathogens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial agents; bacterial resistance; biofilm; biosynthesized silver nanoparticles; endo-perio lesions; minimum inhibitory concentration

Year:  2018        PMID: 30546215      PMCID: PMC6249955          DOI: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_203_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Conserv Dent        ISSN: 0972-0707


INTRODUCTION

Most of the periodontal and endodontic infections are biofilm mediated and have been the subject of intensive research for many years. Bacteria in biofilm exhibit resistance to host defense mechanisms and decreased susceptibility to conventional antimicrobials.[1] Porphyromonas gingivalis is a Gram-negative, black pigmented, rod-shaped obligate anaerobic microorganism which causes several periodontal diseases and endodontic infections periodontitis.[2] Enterococcus faecalis is a Gram-positive, facultative organism most commonly found in persistent apical or lateral periodontitis and endodontic reinfections. It can survive deep in the dentinal tubules and cementum[3] It possesses several virulence factors which makes it the most resistant microbe[3] Bacillus pumilus is a Gram-positive, aerobic, spore-bearing rod-shaped microorganism found in both periodontal pockets, and root canals associated with severe infections[4] The endo-perio pathogens E. faecalis, P. gingivalis, and B. pumilus forms the biofilms either single or multispecies which are difficult to eradicate.[56] Recently, biosynthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have emerged as novel antimicrobial agents owing to their unique chemical and physical properties, smaller size and shape, high surface area to volume ratio, and no bacterial resistance. Hence, show an insight for the management of endodontic, periodontal, or the combined lesions.[7] In our previous study, AgNPs were biosynthesized using endophytic fungi fusarium semitectum and showed efficient antibacterial activity against P. gingivalis, B. pumilus, and E. faecalis[8] The present study aims at evaluating the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of biosynthesized AgNPs and antibacterial efficacy against endo-periopathogens P. gingivalis, B. pumilus, and E. faecalis in biofilm form using dentin blocks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AgNPs were biosynthesized using endophytic fungi Fusarium semitectum and characterized by ultraviolet spectrum, transmission electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy as described earlier were used in the present study.[89] Briefly, the fungi isolated from healthy leaves of Withania Somnifera (Ashwagandha) were allowed to grow on potato dextrose agar plates. Fresh fungal cultures were inoculated in 100 ml malt glucose yeast peptone broth and incubated at 29°C for 72 h. The fungal biomass was filtered using Whatman filter paper number 1, washed with sterile distilled water and 25 g of fungal biomass was then added to flasks containing 100 ml of sterile distilled water and incubated for 48 h. The cell-free fungal filtrate was mixed with 100 ml of 1 mM concentration AgNO3 solution and kept in the dark at 29°C for 24 h and pH adjusted to 7 was used further. The American type culture collection strains ([ATCC], Manassas, VA, USA) of B. pumilus (27142) and E. faecalis (29212) strains were sub-cultured on trypticase soy agar (TSA) plates and incubated at 35°C for 24 h. P. gingivalis (33277) strains were subcultured on sterilized TSA supplemented with 5% sheep blood, hemin (5 μg/ml), vitamin K1 (0.5 μg/ml), and yeast extract (10 mg/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 72 h under anaerobic conditions. MIC of AgNPs against test organisms was determined by micro broth dilution technique as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards guidelines.[10] Each bacterial inoculum was adjusted to 1–2 × 105 cells/ml and 10 μl bacterial inoculum of each test organism was added to wells of microtiter plates with respective culture medium containing 100 μl of series of dilutions of AgNPs ranging from 80 μg/ml to 1 μg/ml. Culture media without AgNPs was used as control group and 10 μl Alamar blue (0.7 mg/ml) was added to all the wells. The treated test plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h and optical density at 600 OD was measured in plate reader (BioTek, PowerWave XS2, Vermont, USA). The lowest concentration of AgNPs that inhibits the growth of test organisms in comparison to the control group was defined as the MIC value. The experiments were performed in triplicates [Figure 1a–c].
Figure 1

Micro broth dilution test plate for minimum inhibitory concentration determination (a) Bacillus pumilus, (b) Enterococcus faecalis and (c) Porphyromonas gingivalis

Micro broth dilution test plate for minimum inhibitory concentration determination (a) Bacillus pumilus, (b) Enterococcus faecalis and (c) Porphyromonas gingivalis The antibacterial efficacy of biosynthesized AgNPs against test microorganisms in biofilm form was evaluated using the dentin blocks according to Nascimento et al.[11] with slight modifications. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee. Overnight grown cultures of test organisms were centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatants were discarded, and the cells were washed twice in sterile deionized water and suspended in 5 ml of TSA broth for B. pumilus and E. faecalis and in TSA supplemented broth for P. gingivalis and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. Turbidity was adjusted to 1 × 107 cells/ml using a spectrophotometer. One hundred and twenty dentin blocks were prepared using sixty human extracted single-rooted teeth. The crown and the apical part of the root were sectioned using a rotary diamond disc to obtain the middle third of the root which was vertically sectioned into two halves, and cementum was removed using the diamond bur to obtain the dentin blocks measuring 5 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm (width × length × thickness). The dentin blocks were treated in an ultrasonic bath of 17% EDTA (Prime Dental Products, Mumbai, India) for 5 min to remove the smear layer followed by 3% sodium hypochlorite (Prime Dental Products, Mumbai, India) for 5 min to remove the organic and inorganic debris and distilled water for another 5 min to remove all the chemicals used and sterilized by autoclaving. The dentin blocks were randomly divided into three groups (n = 40 each) as group 1: B. pumilus (ATCC 27142), Group 2: E. faecalis (ATCC 29212), and Group 3: P. gingivalis (ATCC 33277). For Groups 1 and 2, each dentin block was placed in individual test tubes containing 1 ml of TSA broth and for Group 3 the dentin blocks were placed in individual test tubes containing TSA supplemented broth and subjected to the second cycle of sterilization. For bacterial contamination of the dentin blocks, about 50 μl of the bacterial inoculum was transferred to pre-sterilized individual test tubes (n = 40 each) containing dentin blocks in respective broth. The purity of the cultures was checked by subculturing 5 μl from the incubated dentin blocks on respective culture plates. The broth was replenished every alternate day for a period of 2 weeks. After incubation, dentin blocks were washed twice with 5 ml of sterile distilled water. Biofilm models of dentin blocks in each group were randomly divided into four subgroups (n = 10 each) and treated as follows: Group 1: B. pumilus (ATCC 27142) (n = 40) Subgroup 1A: Sterile distilled water (Control) Subgroup 1B: 0.2% CHX Subgroup 1C: 2 % CHX Subgroup 1 D: 20 μg/ml of AgNPs (MIC dose). Group 2: E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) (n = 40) Subgroup 2 A: Sterile distilled water (Control) Subgroup 2B: 0.2% CHX Subgroup 2C: 2 % CHX Subgroup 2D: 30 μg/ml of AgNPs (MIC dose). Group 3: P. gingivalis (ATCC 33277) (n = 40) Subgroup 3A: Sterile distilled water (Control) Subgroup 3B: 0.2% CHX Subgroup 3C: 2 % CHX Subgroup 3D: 30 μg/ml of AgNPs (MIC dose). After 24 h incubation, each dentin block was rinsed in saline and transferred to micro centrifuge tubes and shaken for 60 s (vortex AP 56). Serial decimal dilutions were prepared, and 50 μl of the dilution were placed on TSA plates for Groups 1 and 2 specimens and on TSA supplemented plates for Group 3 specimens and incubated for 24 h followed by colony forming units (cfu/ml) counting. Data collected was statistically analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Post Hoc Tukey multiple comparison tests [Figure 2].
Figure 2

Biofilm plates of cfu/ml: Group 1 (Bacillus pumilus) 1a: Control, 1b: 0.2% chlorhexidine, 1c: 2% chlorhexidine and 1d: Silver nanoparticles. Group 2 (Enterococcus faecalis) 2a: Control, 2b: 0.2% chlorhexidine, 2c: 2% chlorhexidine and 2d: Silver nanoparticles. Group 3 (Porphyromonas gingivalis) 3a: Control, 3b: 0.2% chlorhexidine, 3c: 2% chlorhexidine and 3d: Silver nanoparticles

Biofilm plates of cfu/ml: Group 1 (Bacillus pumilus) 1a: Control, 1b: 0.2% chlorhexidine, 1c: 2% chlorhexidine and 1d: Silver nanoparticles. Group 2 (Enterococcus faecalis) 2a: Control, 2b: 0.2% chlorhexidine, 2c: 2% chlorhexidine and 2d: Silver nanoparticles. Group 3 (Porphyromonas gingivalis) 3a: Control, 3b: 0.2% chlorhexidine, 3c: 2% chlorhexidine and 3d: Silver nanoparticles

RESULTS

All the test microorganisms were sensitive to biosynthesized AgNPs. The mean value of the three readings was calculated as MIC. MIC of AgNPs for B. pumilus was determined as 20 μg/ml and for E. faecalis and P. gingivalis 30 μg/ml respectively. For antibacterial efficacy in biofilm mode, the mean colony count (cfu/ml [107]) for all the groups was evaluated and shown in Tables 1 and 2. The results of the present study indicate biosynthesized AgNPs are effective against all the three test microbes when compared to the control group. There is no statistically significant difference between the three groups when compared between groups by Post hoc Tukey multiple comparison test.
Table 1

One-way ANOVA analysis for within groups of all three groups for antibiofilm efficacy

Table 2

P value by one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test to compare antibiofilm efficacy between groups

One-way ANOVA analysis for within groups of all three groups for antibiofilm efficacy P value by one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test to compare antibiofilm efficacy between groups

DISCUSSION

Microorganisms grown in biofilms are difficult to eradicate with existing antimicrobial agents and exhibit resistance.[12] Since endodontic-periodontal infections are biofilm mediated and resistant to existing antimicrobial agents, the present study aims to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of biosynthesized AgNPs against the biofilms of B. pumilus, E. faecalis and P. gingivalis. MIC is the lowest concentration of a drug that inhibits the visible growth of the test organism, used to determine the in vitro antibacterial activity of new antimicrobial agents. Different bacterial species have varying MICs. In vitro detection of MIC acts as a guideline for clinical application[13] Although antimicrobial activity of biosynthesized AgNPs was proven on many pathogenic bacteria;[8914] Literature is scarce for application of biosynthesized AgNPs for determining MIC and antibacterial efficacy of fungal-derived AgNPs using tooth models against P. gingivalis, B. pumilus, and E. faecalis.[15] The results of the present study show that AgNPs are effective against test microorganisms with MIC values of 30 μg/ml against P. gingivalis and E. faecalis and 20 μg/ml against B. pumilus. MIC values of AgNPs synthesized using Chamaemelum nobile extract against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis was found to be 7.8, 31.2, and 15.6 μg/ml.[16] MIC of AgNPs-derived from Garcinia imberti against E. faecalis was observed maximum at a concentration of 62.5 mg/ml[17] MIC of fungal-derived AgNPs against E. faecalis biofilm was determined 30 μg/ml with effective antibacterial efficacy.[15] The results of the present study showed effective antibacterial activity against all the test microbes. In the present study, the MIC dose of AgNPs was standardized to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy against test pathogens in biofilm form because it is the minimum dose which inhibits the visible bacterial growth[13] therefore used to evaluate the efficacy of AgNPs at a minimal dose. Biosynthesised AgNPs have emerged as newer antimicrobial agents with effective antimicrobial activity against several pathogens.[818] Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the most effective antimicrobial agent; its effectiveness can be attributed to its substantivity within the oral cavity. It is recommended to use 0.2%–0.12% CHX for plaque control and 2% CHX is recommended as root canal irrigant;[1920] hence, both 0.2 and 2% CHX were used in the present study. Antimicrobial studies on planktonic culture models do not correlate well with clinical findings.[21] Therefore; to ascertain the antibacterial efficacy of AgNPs effectively biofilm model using dentin blocks was evaluated. Human permanent teeth were used to prepare the dentin blocks as they simulate clinical conditions.[22] E. faecalis biofilm was more resistant to CHX than the same strain grown in planktonic suspension and 2% CHX eliminated most of the E. faecalis biofilms.[2324] AgNPs against E. faecalis biofilm using dentin blocks showed less number of viable bacteria for AgNPs compared to CHX.[18] The results of the present study show effective antibacterial activity of biosynthesized against B. pumilus, E. faecalis and P. gingivalis biofilm model at a dose ranging from 20 to 30 μg/ml indicating they can be used as antimicrobial agents in periodontal, endodontic and combined lesions. Results of the present study show an insight for application of biosynthesized AgNPs for the treatment of endo-perio lesions; can be used as root canal irrigants, intracanal medicaments, root canal sealers, can be incorporated for periodontal therapy alternative to topical antiseptics, antimicrobial agents and for local drug delivery.[7]

CONCLUSION

The present in vitro study helps to design and develop intervention approaches for controlling periodontal, endodontic or combined lesions incorporating biosynthesized silver nanoparticles. However, in vitro values of MIC may not hold for in vivo conditions as the bacterial growth varies from in vitro and in vivo conditions. In vitro determination of MIC serves as an attempt for quantifying drug activity against the test microorganisms, and the results of the study show biosynthesized AgNPs are effective against biofilms of P. gingivalis, B. pumilus and E. faecalis.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  18 in total

1.  In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution.

Authors:  M R Leonardo; M Tanomaru Filho; L A Silva; P Nelson Filho; K C Bonifácio; I Y Ito
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 2.  Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial drugs.

Authors:  Matthew E Levison
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.982

3.  Susceptibilties of two Enterococcus faecalis phenotypes to root canal medications.

Authors:  Mariam Abdullah; Yuan-Ling Ng; Kishor Gulabivala; David R Moles; David A Spratt
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  B P Gomes; C C Ferraz; M E Vianna; V B Berber; F B Teixeira; F J Souza-Filho
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.264

5.  Susceptibilities of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms to some antimicrobial medications.

Authors:  K C Lima; L R Fava; J F Siqueira
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of silver nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm.

Authors:  Daming Wu; Wei Fan; Anil Kishen; James L Gutmann; Bing Fan
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Extracellular proteolytic activities expressed by Bacillus pumilus isolated from endodontic and periodontal lesions.

Authors:  Blair T Johnson; Lindsey N Shaw; Daniel C Nelson; John A Mayo
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 8.  Porphyromonas gingivalis: An Overview of Periodontopathic Pathogen below the Gum Line.

Authors:  Kah Yan How; Keang Peng Song; Kok Gan Chan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Biosynthesis, Characterization and Antibacterial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles Derived from Endophytic Fungi against P. gingivalis.

Authors:  Kiran Rahul Halkai; Jayashree A Mudda; Vasundhara Shivanna; Vandana Rathod; Rahul S Halkai
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01

10.  Antibacterial Efficacy of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Kiran Rahul Halkai; Jayashree A Mudda; Vasundhara Shivanna; Vandana Rathod; Rahul Halkai
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more
  3 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity evaluation of fungal-derived silver nanoparticles on human gingival fibroblast cell line: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Kiran R Halkai; Jayashree A Mudda; Vasundhara Shivanna; Veena Patil; Vandana Rathod; Rahul Halkai
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  The Potential Translational Applications of Nanoparticles in Endodontics.

Authors:  Jasmine Wong; Ting Zou; Angeline Hui Cheng Lee; Chengfei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-03-09

3.  Myrrh mixed with silver nanoparticles demonstrates superior antimicrobial activity against Porphyromonas gingivalis compared to myrrh and silver nanoparticles alone.

Authors:  Shatha Subhi ALHarthi; Munerah BinShabaib; Najla Saad AlMasoud; Heba Ahmed Shawky; Kawther F Aabed; Taghrid S Alomar; AlHanouf B AlBrekan; Afrah Jaber Alfaifi; Ayshah Abdulghani Melaibari
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2021-09-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.