| Literature DB >> 30546164 |
Marek Pająk1, Ewa Błońska2, Marta Szostak3, Michał Gąsiorek4, Marcin Pietrzykowski1, Otmar Urban5, Piotr Derbis1.
Abstract
The main objectives of our study were to evaluate soil contamination on a zinc-lead spoil heap in the Upper Silesian Industrial Region in southern Poland using pollution indices, and to investigate the relation between soil properties and the natural succession of vegetation. Organic carbon and nitrogen, pH, soil texture, base cations, and heavy metal content were analyzed in soil samples at depths of 0-15 cm below the organic horizon over a regular grid of 14 sampling plots. The contents of Zn, Pb, and Cd exceeded by several times the acceptable thresholds. Measurements of soil enzyme activity were used to evaluate the progress of vegetation development in relation to soil chemical properties. The results indicate that heavy metals had a significant impact on soil enzyme activity and the development of vegetation cover. High contents of Pb and Cd reduced enzyme activity, while this activity increased with increasing amounts of soil organic matter. Further, the accumulative capacities of heavy metals in needles of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and aboveground biomass of bladder campion (Silene vulgaris (Moench) Garcke) were examined. A high accumulation of Zn, Pb, and Cd in the aboveground tissues of S. vulgaris indicated an unusual tolerance of this species to heavy metals and the possibility of using this species in phytoremediation of post-industrial sites.Entities:
Keywords: Microbial activity; Phytoremediation; Pinus sylvestris; Silene vulgaris; Soil contamination
Year: 2018 PMID: 30546164 PMCID: PMC6267170 DOI: 10.1007/s11270-018-4040-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Water Air Soil Pollut ISSN: 0049-6979 Impact factor: 2.520
Fig. 1Location of the research area (Upper Silesian Industrial Region, southern Poland) (left) and location of research plots on the site (right)
Fig. 2Aerial view of the spoil heap (photo Romankiewicz 2012)
Fig. 3Development of vegetation on sampling area from 1947 (left) to 2011 (right)
Characteristics of the spoil heap vegetation cover (mean ± standard deviation and minimum–maximum values). The study area was separated into three clusters according to the results of PCA analysis
| Sampling plots | S | H | CSimpson’s | V | Dominant species |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First cluster (7 and 9 plot) | 62.5 ± 16.3 51–74 | 1.86 ± 0.19 1.72–2.00 | 0.035 ± 0.007 0.03–0.04 | 794.6 ± 956.1118.5–1470.7 | |
| Second cluster (4,6,8,10–14 plots) | 47.9 ± 10.9 31–64 | 1.75 ± 0.12 1.56–1.99 | 0.038 ± 0.005 0.03–0.05 | 344.76 ± 232.17 2.30–571.91 | |
| Third cluster (1–3,5 plots) | 33.2 ± 7.9 25–44 | 1.50 ± 0.15 1.30–1.66 | 0.048 ± 0.007 0.04–0.06 | 6.77 ± 12.00 0.00–24.7 | |
| All plots | 45.8 ± 13.9 25–74 | 1.7 ± 0.18 1.3–2.0 | 0.041 ± 0.008 0.03–0.06 | 312.4 ± 405.6 0.00–1470.7 | – |
S, species richness; H, Shannon index of diversity; CSimpson’s, Simpson’s dominance index; V, volume of trees (stem and branch volume) (m3·ha−1)
The soil characteristics of the spoil heap studied
| Plot | pH H2O | pH KCl | TOC | Nt | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Na+ | K+ | BC | Sand | Silt | Clay | DH | BG | UR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.68 | 7.56 | 1.63 | 0.05 | 14.92 | 2.08 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 17.1 | 23 | 63 | 14 | 19.11 | 73.83 | 0.25 |
| 2 | 7.77 | 7.54 | 0.77 | 0.07 | 15.94 | 2.34 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 18.5 | 22 | 64 | 14 | 32.51 | 166.25 | 0.31 |
| 3 | 7.01 | 6.88 | 1.17 | 0.10 | 16.04 | 1.76 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 17.9 | 20 | 68 | 12 | 24.00 | 155.75 | 0.23 |
| 4 | 7.52 | 7.32 | 1.24 | 0.09 | 15.76 | 1.59 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 17.6 | 7 | 75 | 18 | 52.50 | 335.50 | 0.48 |
| 5 | 7.74 | 7.51 | 2.45 | 0.12 | 14.87 | 2.38 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 17.4 | 28 | 62 | 10 | 53.10 | 246.58 | 0.43 |
| 6 | 7.59 | 7.3 | 2.20 | 0.15 | 15.84 | 3.42 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 19.5 | 13 | 73 | 14 | 38.09 | 225.53 | 0.55 |
| 7 | 7.22 | 6.83 | 8.01 | 0.50 | 28.89 | 5.72 | 0.03 | 0.67 | 35.3 | 13 | 74 | 13 | 181.37 | 506.88 | 1.27 |
| 8 | 7.64 | 7.35 | 1.49 | 0.10 | 18.93 | 3.68 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 23.0 | 2 | 75 | 23 | 43.51 | 168.17 | 0.51 |
| 9 | 7.28 | 6.96 | 6.14 | 0.43 | 25.77 | 4.66 | 0.02 | 0.49 | 30.9 | 11 | 75 | 14 | 189.93 | 519.71 | 1.51 |
| 10 | 7.53 | 7.15 | 2.12 | 0.13 | 19.62 | 4.97 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 24.9 | 3 | 76 | 21 | 27.44 | 344.37 | 0.46 |
| 11 | 7.54 | 7.28 | 2.40 | 0.12 | 17.15 | 3.55 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 20.9 | 8 | 76 | 16 | 46.94 | 442.90 | 0.47 |
| 12 | 7.46 | 7.08 | 3.39 | 0.21 | 19.57 | 5.29 | 0.02 | 0.42 | 25.3 | 5 | 77 | 18 | 29.17 | 500.28 | 0.62 |
| 13 | 7.63 | 7.31 | 2.68 | 0.15 | 16.52 | 4.23 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 21.0 | 4 | 78 | 18 | 19.48 | 263.43 | 0.36 |
| 14 | 7.62 | 7.28 | 1.92 | 0.13 | 17.72 | 3.42 | 0.04 | 0.31 | 21.5 | 5 | 76 | 19 | 28.47 | 377.52 | 0.43 |
| Average | 7.52 | 7.24 | 2.69 | 0.17 | 18.40 | 3.51 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 22.2 | 12 | 72 | 16 | 56.12 | 309.05 | 0.56 |
| SD | 0.21 | 0.23 | 2.01 | 0.13 | 4.14 | 1.34 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 5.4 | 8.3 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 56.02 | 145.88 | 0.37 |
SD, standard deviation; TOC, total organic carbon (%); Nt, total nitrogen (%); Ca2+·K+·Mg2+·Na+ (cmol(+) kg−1); BC, base cations; sand, silt, and clay (cmol(+) kg−1); DH, dehydrogenase activity (μmol TPF·kg-1·h−1); BG, β-glucosidase activity (mmol pNP·kg-1·h−1); UR, urease activity (mmol N-NH4·kg-1·h−1)
Heavy metal and Fe content in the soil of study area
| Np. | Fe | Zn | Pb | Mn | Cd | Cr | Cu | Ni |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.18 | 30,451 | 15,012 | 5401 | 295.5 | 153.0 | 43.4 | 30.1 |
| 2 | 10.01 | 30,821 | 15,697 | 4381 | 324.6 | 82.3 | 45.8 | 31.5 |
| 3 | 11.73 | 61,516 | 14,402 | 3738 | 689.0 | 133.8 | 45.6 | 34.2 |
| 4 | 14.46 | 47,634 | 11,377 | 4122 | 453.0 | 153.1 | 44.6 | 32.6 |
| 5 | 10.34 | 44,531 | 11,047 | 4479 | 369.0 | 89.7 | 38.0 | 35.9 |
| 6 | 8.89 | 17,889 | 15,777 | 3970 | 210.6 | 108.2 | 79.2 | 34.2 |
| 7 | 5.47 | 8756 | 3499 | 3891 | 88.5 | 85.9 | 100.1 | 39.0 |
| 8 | 13.09 | 26,294 | 17,477 | 5104 | 243.6 | 180.3 | 86.1 | 47.2 |
| 9 | 4.49 | 8461 | 1346 | 3978 | 67.0 | 77.4 | 50.0 | 29.1 |
| 10 | 13.72 | 31,059 | 13,772 | 5069 | 263.5 | 125.2 | 67.6 | 51.9 |
| 11 | 9.87 | 25,866 | 8102 | 3911 | 246.0 | 129.1 | 41.9 | 34.0 |
| 12 | 14.12 | 37,029 | 14,157 | 4937 | 368.3 | 147.6 | 60.9 | 49.0 |
| 13 | 13.05 | 40,991 | 13,247 | 5051 | 362.5 | 83.8 | 34.8 | 47.6 |
| 14 | 9.97 | 34,814 | 15,502 | 3663 | 372.0 | 130.9 | 15.0 | 39.4 |
| Average | 10.67 | 31,865 | 12,172 | 4407 | 311.0 | 120.0 | 53.8 | 38.3 |
| SD | 3.02 | 14,557 | 4774 | 594 | 153.6 | 32.5 | 22.6 | 7.6 |
Fe in %; Zn, Pb, Mn, Cd, Cr, Cu, and Ni in mg·kg−1
Fig. 4Distribution of Zn and Pb content (mg kg−1) in soil in the study area
The range of Igeo values and the percentage share of soils according to Igeo pollution classes
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 0 | 0–1 | 1–2 | 2–3 | 3–4 | 4–5 | ≥ 5 | ||
| Local backgrounds | ||||||||
| Zn | −1.46:1.40 | 22 | 64 | 14 | – | – | – | – |
| Pb | −4.31:-0.62 | 100 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cd | −2.23:1.13 | 50 | 43 | 7 | – | – | – | – |
| Cr | −0.90:0.33 | 71 | 29 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cu | −0.93:1.81 | 7 | 57 | 36 | – | – | – | – |
| Ni | −0.24:0.59 | 50 | 50 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Backgrounds by Kabata-Pendias ( | ||||||||
| Zn | 6.33:9.19 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100 |
| Pb | 5.90:9.60 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100 |
| Cd | 8.80:12.17 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100 |
| Cr | −0.96:0.27 | 79 | 21 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cu | −2.46:0.28 | 86 | 14 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Ni | −0.04:0.79 | 7 | 93 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Backgrounds by Rudnick and Gao ( | ||||||||
| Zn | 6.40:9.26 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100 |
| Pb | 5.72:9.42 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100 |
| Cd | 8.96:12.32 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100 |
| Cr | −0.84:0.39 | 71 | 29 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cu | −1.49:1.25 | 22 | 64 | 14 | – | – | – | – |
| Ni | −1.28:-0.44 | 100 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
*Interpretation of Igeo pollution classes is given in pollution indices chapter
The range of EF values and the percentage share of soils according to EF pollution classes
| EF | EF pollution classes* [% of soil] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 2 | 2–5 | 5–20 | 20–40 | > 40 | ||
| Local backgrounds | ||||||
| Zn | 0.84:2.74 | 86 | 14 | – | – | – |
| Pb | 0.14:−0.77 | 100 | – | – | – | – |
| Cd | 0.30:3.28 | 93 | 7 | – | – | – |
| Cr | 0.42:2.52 | 86 | 14 | – | – | – |
| Cu | 0.58:5.86 | 36 | 57 | 7 | – | – |
| Ni | 0.32:2.18 | 93 | 7 | – | – | – |
| Backgrounds by Kabata-Pendias ( | ||||||
| Zn | 11.43:37.46 | – | – | 50 | 50 | – |
| Pb | 5.55:32.87 | – | – | 57 | 43 | – |
| Cd | 18.20:71.63 | – | – | 15 | 64 | 21 |
| Cr | 0.05:0.14 | 100 | – | – | – | – |
| Cu | 0.02:0.24 | 100 | – | – | – | – |
| Ni | 0.04:0.12 | 100 | – | – | – | – |
| Backgrounds by Rudnick and Gao ( | ||||||
| Zn | 1.48:4.85 | 29 | 71 | – | – | – |
| Pb | 1.09:6.46 | 7 | 93 | – | – | – |
| Cd | 10.26:40.40 | – | – | 64 | 29 | 7 |
| Cr | 0.00:0.01 | 100 | – | – | – | – |
| Cu | 0.00:0.04 | 100 | – | – | – | – |
| Ni | 0.00:0.01 | 100 | – | – | – | – |
*Interpretation of EF pollution classes is given in pollution indices chapter
Heavy metal content in Scots pine needles and S. vulgaris aboveground biomass
| Zn | Pb | Mn | Cd | Cr | Cu | Ni | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | 212.3 | 14.3 | 110.2 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 0.1 |
| Range | 150.4–323.5 | 6.6–33.0 | 50.7–1778.7 | 0.5–1.6 | 1.3–6.6 | 0.8–4.7 | 0.0–0.3 |
| SD | 51.9 | 8.6 | 40.6 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 |
| Average | 402.9 | 70.1 | 34.3 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Range | 74.6–736.5 | 5.6–198.9 | 9.3–70.2 | 1.0–11.0 | 0.0–14.5 | 0.0–5.2 | 0.0–6.5 |
| SD | 191.6 | 50.2 | 15.4 | 2.9 | 5.2 | 1.4 | 2.3 |
SD, standard deviation; Zn, Pb, Mn, Cd, Cr, Cu, and Ni in mg·kg−1
Pearson correlation coefficient between heavy metal content in Scots pine needles and S. vulgaris aboveground biomass and soil characteristics
| C | N | Fe | Ca | Zn | Pb | Cd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pine needles | |||||||
| Zn | −0.48 | −0.34 | 0.52 | −0.31 | 0.58* | 0.41 | 0.60* |
| Pb | −0.01 | −0.07 | 0.05 | −0.22 | 0.30 | −0.02 | 0.27 |
|
| |||||||
| Zn | −0.58* | −0.62* | 0.79* | −0.72* | 0.77* | 0.69* | 0.74* |
| Pb | −0.41 | −0.51 | 0.52 | −0.43 | 0.43 | 0.68* | 0.46 |
*P < 0.05
Multiple regression analysis for enzymes activity based on soil characteristics. R2 describes the percentage of explained variance. β is the regression coefficient for given equation parameter and p is the significance level for the equation parameter
| Enzyme activity |
| Equation parameter |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DH | 77% | logPb | −0.874 | 0.0001 |
| UR | 90% | logN | 0.488 | 0.0015 |
| logCd | −0.379 | 0.0087 | ||
| BG | 61% | logN | 0.709 | 0.0009 |
DH, dehydrogenase activity; UR, urease activity; BG, β-glucosidase activity
Fig. 5The projection of measured variables on a plane of the first and second PCA factors