| Literature DB >> 30545419 |
Guijuan Zhang1,2, Bing Li3,4, Jie Liu1,2, Mingqiang Luan1,2, Long Yue1,2, Xiao-Tao Jiang5, Ke Yu6, Yuntao Guan7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, the effect of the bacterial community on cast iron corrosion process does not reach consensus. Moreover, some studies have produced contrasting results, suggesting that bacteria can either accelerate or inhibit corrosion.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial community; Corrosion; Desulfovibrio; High-throughput sequencing; Reclaimed wastewater
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30545419 PMCID: PMC6292113 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0610-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1The weight loss of the cast iron coupons in the NaClOdisinfection, NONdisinfection, and UVdisinfection reactors during a 1-year period. Each data point represents the average weight loss of four pieces of cast iron coupons (n = 4). Error bars represent the standard deviation
Fig. 2SEM micrograph of the cast iron corrosion scale at the 52nd week, magnification = ×20,000. a Black layer in the NaClOdisinfection reactor; b yellow layer in the NaClOdisinfection reactor; c black layer in the NONdisinfection reactor; d yellow layer in the NONdisinfection reactor; e black layer in the UVdisinfection reactor; f yellow layer in the UVdisinfection reactor
Fig. 3XRD spectrograms of the cast iron corrosion products at the 52nd week. a Black layer in the NaClOdisinfection reactor; b yellow layer in the NaClOdisinfection reactor; c black layer in the NONdisinfection reactor; d yellow layer in the NONdisinfection reactor; e black layer in the UVdisinfection reactor; f yellow layer in the UVdisinfection reactor
Fig. 4Taxonomic dendrograms of the bacterial community detected over a 1-year period in the a black layer and b yellow layer of three reactors. Different taxonomic branches are labeled according to phylum, except Proteobacteria, which was labeled by class. The edges represent the taxonomic path from the root bacteria down to the OTU level (similarity cutoff: 97%). OTUs were located at the lowest possible assignment level, and the node sizes indicated their relative abundance. The nodes are colored according to both their abundance and frequency of occurrence. Red nodes: abundant-persistent (AP) OTUs; blue nodes: abundant-intermediate (AI) OTUs; orange nodes: rare-persistent (RP) OTUs; violet nodes: rare-intermediate (RI) OTUs. The definition of OTUs types was described in subsection “Abundant and persistent bacteria during the biofilm development process”
Fig. 5Temporal trajectories in the community composition of the yellow and black layers are presented in the ordination space of principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on weighted UniFrac distance for the a NaClOdisinfection reactor, b NONdisinfection reactor, and c UVdisinfection reactor. Trajectories were presented by lines that sequentially connect sampling points. Circles highlighted initial attachment stage I and terminal stable stage III. Other plots were classified as mid-term development stage II
Fig. 6Extended error bar plots showing the abundance of genera differing significantly between the NaClOdisinfection and NONdisinfection reactors with an effect size of 0.75. a Genera in the black layer of stage II; b genera in the black layer of stage III; c genera in the yellow layer of stage II; d genera in the yellow layer of stage III. The numbers in the parentheses represent the amounts of OTUs belonging to the genus correspondingly to Fig. 4. The red numbers represent the AP-type OTUs; the orange numbers represent the RP-type OTUs; and the light purple numbers represent the RI-type OTUs
Fig. 7a The abundance variation in Desulfovibrio during a 1-year period. b Model of the redox transition between NO3− and NO2−, Fe, Fe2+, and Fe3+. The electrochemical corrosion process is represented by black dotted lines, and the microbial-induced corrosion process is represented by black solid lines