| Literature DB >> 30545032 |
Jan Palán1, Radek Procházka2, Jan Džugan3, Jan Nacházel4, Michal Duchek5, Gergely Németh6,7, Kristián Máthis8, Peter Minárik9, Klaudia Horváth10,11.
Abstract
This paper describes the mechanical properties and microstructure of commercially pure titanium (Grade 2) processed with Conform severe plastic deformation (SPD) and rotary swaging techniques. This technology enables ultrafine-grained to nanocrystalline wires to be produced in a continuous process. A comprehensive description is given of those properties which should enable straightforward implementation of the material in medical applications. Conform SPD processing has led to a dramatic refinement of the initial microstructure, producing equiaxed grains already in the first pass. The mean grain size in the transverse direction was 320 nm. Further passes did not lead to any additional appreciable grain refinement. The subsequent rotary swaging caused fine grains to become elongated. A single Conform SPD pass and subsequent rotary swaging resulted in an ultimate strength of 1060 MPa and elongation of 12%. The achieved fatigue limit was 396 MPa. This paper describes the production possibilities of ultrafine to nanocrystalline wires made of pure titanium and points out the possibility of serial production, particularly in medical implants.Entities:
Keywords: Conform; ECAP; continuous extrusion; medical implants; titanium; wire
Year: 2018 PMID: 30545032 PMCID: PMC6316910 DOI: 10.3390/ma11122522
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic representation of the Conform severe plastic deformation (SPD) technique.
Chemical composition of feedstock, wt. %.
| Element | Fe | O | C | H | N | Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | 0.046 | 0.12 | 0.023 | 0.0026 | 0.0076 | balance |
Figure 2Numerical modelling of the Conform SPD process: (a) Strain rate distribution (s−1); (b) Velocity distribution (mm/s); (c) Temperature distribution (°C).
Figure 3(a) Micrograph of the as-received structure in the transverse direction; (b) detailed micrograph of the as-received structure.
Figure 4(a) Substructure in the transverse direction after the first pass; (b) substructure in the longitudinal direction after the first pass; (c) substructure in the transverse direction after the second pass; (d) substructure in the longitudinal direction after the second pass; (e) substructure in the transverse direction after the third pass; (f) substructure in the longitudinal direction after the third pass.
Mean grain size for different processing steps.
| Transverse Direction | Longitudinal Direction | |
|---|---|---|
| As received | 28.95 µm | |
| 1 pass | 320 ± 35 nm | 310 ± 30 nm |
| 2 passes | 250 ± 25 nm | 310 ± 30 nm |
| 3 passes | 330 ± 30 nm | 420 ± 30 nm |
Figure 5(a) Substructure in the longitudinal direction after one pass through the Conform SPD machine and rotary swaging; (b) substructure in the longitudinal direction after one pass and rotary swaging.
Figure 6Cross-section orientation image maps (OIM) and inverse pole figure (IPF) maps for samples after (a) first pass (50 × 50 µm), (b) second pass (20 × 20 µm), and (c) third pass (15 × 15 µm) through Conform SPD. In the figure on the left, the scale of texture intensities is shown as multiples of the random density (m.r.d.) from 0–8.000. The maximum value of each texture is listed below the IPF maps. The orientation triangle for the electron-backscatter diffraction (EBSD) maps is shown in the right-hand corner of the figure.
Figure 7Transmission EBSD map of the sample after one Conform SPD pass and rotary swaging (3 × 3 µm). High-angle grain boundaries (>15°) are marked by black lines, while the low-angle grain boundaries (between 4° and 15°) are marked by white lines. The texture intensities are carried out as the multiples of random density (m.r.d.) from 0–8.000, with maximum at 12.409 m.r.d.
Mechanical properties after Conform SPD processing and after Conform SPD + rotary swaging. Ultimate tensile strength (UTS); offset yield (OYS); reduction in area (RA); elongation (A5).
| Condition | 0.2 OYS [MPa] | UTS [MPa] | A5 [%] | RA [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As received | 370 ± 9.4 | 480 ± 7.7 | 25 ± 1.3 | 52 ± 1.9 |
| Conform SPD—1 pass | 540 ± 5.8 | 580 ± 6.1 | 23 ± 1.2 | 62 ± 2.3 |
| Conform SPD—2 passes | 560 ± 1.6 | 600 ± 5.6 | 23 ± 1.3 | 62 ± 2.2 |
| Conform SPD—3 passes | 570 ± 1.8 | 623 ± 4.8 | 23 ± 1.4 | 62 ± 2.1 |
| Conform SPD 1 pass + Rotary Swaging (80% area reduction) | 975 ± 2.3 | 1060 ± 4.6 | 12 ± 1.4 | 58 ± 2.3 |
| Rotary Swaging (80% area reduction) | 890 ± 2.1 | 964 ± 4.4 | 9 ± 1.3 | 34.2 ± 2.4 |
Figure 8S–N curve for the sample after Conform SPD one pass + rotary swaging (80% area reduction).
Figure 9Fracture surface of the sample (Conform SPD one pass + rotary swaging (80% area reduction)) after (a) fatigue testing and (b) fracture initiation area.