| Literature DB >> 30544587 |
Shaoying Li1,2, Xiaojun Xi3,4, Yiwa Luo5,6, Mingtao Mao7,8, Xiao Shi9,10, Jing Guo11,12, Hanjie Guo13,14.
Abstract
In this paper, the precipitation of carbide and wear loss of high-carbon 8 mass% Cr tool steel at two tempering conditions (i.e., 773⁻803 K and 823⁻853 K) were studied by INCA Steel, EPMA-1720H, XRD, and ML-10 tester. The results show that the particles of test steels include the carbides (Cr₇C₃ and Cr23C₆) and carbides nucleated on Al₂O₃. When carbides are of the same size, the number of carbides in test steel at a tempering temperature of 773⁻803 K is greater than that at a tempering temperature of 823⁻853 K, especially when the size of carbides is less than 5 μm. Compared with the test steel tempered at 823⁻853 K, the distance between adjacent actual particles reduced by 80.6 μm and the maximum amount of reduction was 9.4% for single wear loss at the tempering temperature of 773⁻803 K. It can be concluded from thermodynamics results that Al₂O₃ inclusions began to precipitate in liquid, and the precipitation of carbides was at the solid⁻liquid region. Al₂O₃ can be used as the nucleation interface of carbide, thus promoting the formation of carbides. During the cooling of molten steel, a lower temperature can increase the difference of actual solubility product bigger than equilibrium solubility product, thus promoting the carbide formation.Entities:
Keywords: carbide precipitation; different tempering temperatures; high-carbon 8 mass% Cr tool steel; wear resistance
Year: 2018 PMID: 30544587 PMCID: PMC6316919 DOI: 10.3390/ma11122491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical compositions of the test steels (wt %).
| Element | Fe | C | Si | Mn | Cr | Mo | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bal. | 1.2 | 1.0 | <0.6 | 8.5 | 2.50 | 0.50 |
Parameters for the heat treatment process.
| Heat Treatment Stage | Temperature (K)/Time (min) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sample A | Sample B | |
| Spheroidizing Annealing | 1073–1173/40–60 | 1073–1173/40–60 |
| Austenitizing | 1273–1373/20–40 | 1273–1373/20~40 |
| First Tempering | 823–853/60–90 | 773–803/60~90 |
| Second Tempering | 823–853/60–90 | 773–803/60–90 |
| Final hardness (HRC) | 58–60 | 61–63 |
Figure 1Schematic of wear test specimen and sandpaper.
Figure 2Phase equilibrium diagram of the steel calculated using Thermo-Calc software (M represents metallic element atom; C represents carbon atom).
Figure 3Changes in element contents of M7C3-type and M23C6-type carbide in high-carbon 8 mass% Cr tool steel as a function of temperature: (a) M7C3-type carbide; (b) M23C6-type carbide.
Figure 4Metallographic observation of the microstructures of specimens: (a) sample A; (b) sample B.
Figure 5Carbides and oxides SEM morphology: (a) sample A, (b) sample B.
Figure 6Carbides and oxides elemental maps of sample B.
Figure 7Number distribution of various sizes for carbides and carbides nucleated on oxides.
Figure 8Experimental XRD profiles (relative intensities) of samples A and B.
Figure 9EPMA profiles obtained across carbides and oxides of sample B: (a) measurement path; (b) V, Cr, Al, O, and C.
Mass loss for samples A and B.
| Sample | Mass Loss/mg | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Total | |
| A | 38.3 | 36.1 | 37.7 | 40.4 | 40.6 | 193.1 |
| B | 37.4 | 35.8 | 37.7 | 38.3 | 37.1 | 186.3 |
| 0.9 | 0.3 | 0 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 6.8 | |
| [ | 2.41% | 0.84% | 0 | 5.48% | 9.4% | 3.66% |
Chemical reactions and Gibbs Energy ∆Gθ.
| Number | Reaction | ∆Gθ (J/mol) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2/3[Cr] + [O] = 1/3 Cr2O3 | −273010 + 119.69T [ |
| 2 | 2/3[Al] + [O] = 1/3 Al2O3 | −408333.333 + 131.26T [ |
| 3 | [Mn]+[O]= MnO | −244316 + 106.84T [ |
| 4 | 1/2[Si] + [O]= 1/2 SiO2 | −297142.5 + 114.88T [ |
| 5 | 2/3[V] + [O]= 1/3 V2O3 | −251164 + 102.24T [ |
| 6 | 1/2[Mo] + [O]= 1/2 MoO2 | −172254.805 + 115.08T [ |
The first interaction coefficient of each element to C, O, Cr, Al, Mn, Si, V, Mo.
|
| Al | C | Cr | Mn | Mo | N | O | S | Si | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.043 | 0.14 | −0.024 | −0.012 | −0.0083 | 0.11 | −0.34 | 0.46 | 0.08 | −0.077 |
|
| −0.12 | −0.0003 | 0.0018 | −0.19 | −0.14 | −0.02 | −0.0043 | |||
|
| −0.07 | −0.091 | −0.083 | −0.048 | ||||||
|
| −0.097 | −0.0003 | 0.0046 | −0.1 | −0.0007 | −0.0005 | ||||
|
| −3.9 | −0.45 | −0.04 | −0.021 | 0.0035 | 0.057 | −0.2 | −0.133 | −0.131 | −0.3 |
|
| 0.058 | 0.18 | −0.0003 | 0.002 | −0.23 | 0.056 | 0.11 | 0.025 | ||
|
| −0.34 | −0.35 | −0.97 | −0.028 | 0.042 | 0.015 |
Figure 10Precipitation thermodynamic calculation results: (a) oxides, (b) carbides.
Number, total area of particles, and the distance between adjacent actual particles for samples A and B.
| Sample | A | B |
|---|---|---|
|
| 329 | 910 |
|
| 163 | 399 |
|
| 682.04 | 2498.33 |
|
| 1150.70 | 9993.32 |
|
| 201.36 | 121.30 |
Figure 11Schematic diagram of carbides in steel and hard particles during wear process: (a) sample A, (b) sample B.