Teuta Gjuladin-Hellon1,2, Ian G Davies1, Peter Penson3, Raziyeh Amiri Baghbadorani1. 1. School of Sports Studies and Nutrition, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Merseyside, United Kingdom. 2. Faculty of Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Tetovo, Tetovo, Macedonia. 3. School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Merseyside, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Context: Carbohydrate-restricted diets may increase low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and thereby cardiovascular risk. Objective: A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted to compare the effects of very low, low, and moderate carbohydrate, higher fat diets versus high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other lipid markers in overweight/obese adults. Data Sources: Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL Plus were searched to identify large randomized controlled trials (n > 100) with duration ≥ 6 months. Data Extraction: Eight randomized controlled trials (n = 1633; 818 carbohydrate-restricted diet, 815 low-fat diet) were included. Data Analysis: Quality assessment and risk of bias, a random effects model, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on the degree of carbohydrate restriction were performed using Cochrane Review Manager. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Results: Carbohydrate-restricted diets showed no significant difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after 6, 12, and 24 months. Although an overall pooled analysis statistically favored low-fat diets (0.07 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.13; P = 0.009], this was clinically insignificant. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and plasma triglycerides at 6 and 12 months favored carbohydrate-restricted diets (0.08 mmol/L; 95%CI, 0.06-0.11; P < 1 × 10-5 and -0.13 mmol/L; 95%CI, -0.19 to -0.08; P < 1 × 10-5, respectively). These favorable changes were more marked in the subgroup with very-low carbohydrate content (< 50 g/d; 0.12 mmol/L; 95%CI, 0.10-0.14; P < 1 × 10-5 and -0.19 mmol/L; 95%CI, -0.26 to -0.12; P = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Large randomized controlled trials of at least 6 months duration with carbohydrate restriction appear superior in improving lipid markers when compared with low-fat diets. Dietary guidelines should consider carbohydrate restriction as an alternative dietary strategy for the prevention/management of dyslipidemia for populations with cardiometabolic risk.
Context:Carbohydrate-restricted diets may increase low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and thereby cardiovascular risk. Objective: A systematic review and meta-analyses were conducted to compare the effects of very low, low, and moderate carbohydrate, higher fat diets versus high-carbohydrate, low-fat diets on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and other lipid markers in overweight/obese adults. Data Sources: Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL Plus were searched to identify large randomized controlled trials (n > 100) with duration ≥ 6 months. Data Extraction: Eight randomized controlled trials (n = 1633; 818 carbohydrate-restricted diet, 815 low-fat diet) were included. Data Analysis: Quality assessment and risk of bias, a random effects model, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on the degree of carbohydrate restriction were performed using Cochrane Review Manager. Results were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Results:Carbohydrate-restricted diets showed no significant difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after 6, 12, and 24 months. Although an overall pooled analysis statistically favored low-fat diets (0.07 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.13; P = 0.009], this was clinically insignificant. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and plasma triglycerides at 6 and 12 months favored carbohydrate-restricted diets (0.08 mmol/L; 95%CI, 0.06-0.11; P < 1 × 10-5 and -0.13 mmol/L; 95%CI, -0.19 to -0.08; P < 1 × 10-5, respectively). These favorable changes were more marked in the subgroup with very-low carbohydrate content (< 50 g/d; 0.12 mmol/L; 95%CI, 0.10-0.14; P < 1 × 10-5 and -0.19 mmol/L; 95%CI, -0.26 to -0.12; P = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Large randomized controlled trials of at least 6 months duration with carbohydrate restriction appear superior in improving lipid markers when compared with low-fat diets. Dietary guidelines should consider carbohydrate restriction as an alternative dietary strategy for the prevention/management of dyslipidemia for populations with cardiometabolic risk.
Authors: Cara B Ebbeling; Amy Knapp; Ann Johnson; Julia M W Wong; Kimberly F Greco; Clement Ma; Samia Mora; David S Ludwig Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: David J Unwin; Simon D Tobin; Scott W Murray; Christine Delon; Adrian J Brady Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Faiza Kalam; Kelsey Gabel; Sofia Cienfuegos; Eric Wiseman; Mark Ezpeleta; Malik Steward; Vasiliki Pavlou; Krista A Varady Journal: Obes Sci Pract Date: 2019-09-13
Authors: Sara Castro-Barquero; Ana María Ruiz-León; Maria Sierra-Pérez; Ramon Estruch; Rosa Casas Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 5.717