Literature DB >> 3054397

Toward an applied technology for quality measurement in health care.

D M Berwick1.   

Abstract

Cost containment, financial incentives to conserve resources, the growth of for-profit hospitals, an aggressive malpractice environment, and demands from purchasers are among the forces today increasing the need for improved methods that measure quality in health care. At the same time, increasingly sophisticated databases and the existence of managed care systems yield new opportunities to observe and correct quality problems. Research on targets of measurement (structure, process, and outcome) and methods of measurement (implicit, explicit, and sentinel methods) has not yet produced managerially useful applied technology for quality measurement in real-world settings. Such an applied technology would have to be cheaper, faster, more flexible, better reported, and more multidimensional than the majority of current research on quality assurance. In developing a new applied technology for the measurement of health care quality, quantitative disciplines have much to offer, such as decision support systems, criteria based on rigorous decision analyses, utility theory, tools for functional status measurement, and advances in operations research.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3054397     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  6 in total

1.  Medical necessity for right heart catheterization.

Authors:  M L Bing; R L Abel; L J Lee; C McCauley
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1997

2.  Implementing composite quality metrics for bipolar disorder: towards a more comprehensive approach to quality measurement.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Carrie Farmer Teh; Deborah Welsh; Harold Alan Pincus; Elaine Lasky; Brian Perron; Mark S Bauer
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.238

3.  Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems.

Authors:  D W Bates; A C O'Neil; D Boyle; J Teich; G M Chertow; A L Komaroff; T A Brennan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Continuous assessment and improvement in quality of care. A model from the Department of Veterans Affairs Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  K E Hammermeister; R Johnson; G Marshall; F L Grover
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Stroke care: how do we measure quality?

Authors:  Kieran Walsh; P H Gompertz; A G Rudd
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  An evidence-based framework to measure quality of allied health care.

Authors:  Karen Grimmer; Lucylynn Lizarondo; Saravana Kumar; Erica Bell; Michael Buist; Philip Weinstein
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2014-02-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.