Dawn M Upchurch1, Pamela Jo Johnson2. 1. 1 Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health , Los Angeles, California. 2. 2 School of Public Health, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Meditation is a common type of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and the evidence for its usefulness for health promotion is growing. Women have higher rates of overall CAM use than men do, but little is known about gender differences in meditation practices, reasons for use, or perceived benefits. METHODS: Data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were used. The NHIS design is a multistage probability sample representative of US adults aged ≥18 (n = 34,342). Design-based F-test and logistic regression were used; all analyses were weighted and were performed in 2017-2018. RESULTS: Overall, 10.3% of women and 5.2% of men reported using some type of meditation in the past year (p < 0.001). Among meditators, a higher percentage of women used meditation with yoga, tai chi, or qi gong, but men were more likely to use specific types of stand-alone practices (e.g., mindfulness) than women (p < 0.001 for each type). The most common reason reported for using meditation was to reduce stress (35%). Although women and men reported similar reasons for meditating, there were gender differences in the prevalence of some reasons. Both men and women perceived meditation to be helpful (90% and 94%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There are gender differences in prevalence, purpose, and perceived benefits of using meditation. US adults aged ≥18 use meditation and find it helpful. Although currently less prevalent among men, providers can consider meditation as a tool for health promotion in both men and women.
INTRODUCTION: Meditation is a common type of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and the evidence for its usefulness for health promotion is growing. Women have higher rates of overall CAM use than men do, but little is known about gender differences in meditation practices, reasons for use, or perceived benefits. METHODS: Data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were used. The NHIS design is a multistage probability sample representative of US adults aged ≥18 (n = 34,342). Design-based F-test and logistic regression were used; all analyses were weighted and were performed in 2017-2018. RESULTS: Overall, 10.3% of women and 5.2% of men reported using some type of meditation in the past year (p < 0.001). Among meditators, a higher percentage of women used meditation with yoga, tai chi, or qi gong, but men were more likely to use specific types of stand-alone practices (e.g., mindfulness) than women (p < 0.001 for each type). The most common reason reported for using meditation was to reduce stress (35%). Although women and men reported similar reasons for meditating, there were gender differences in the prevalence of some reasons. Both men and women perceived meditation to be helpful (90% and 94%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There are gender differences in prevalence, purpose, and perceived benefits of using meditation. US adults aged ≥18 use meditation and find it helpful. Although currently less prevalent among men, providers can consider meditation as a tool for health promotion in both men and women.
Entities:
Keywords:
complementary and alternative medicine; gender; meditation; mind–body; stress
Authors: Natalia E Morone; Carol M Greco; Charity G Moore; Bruce L Rollman; Bridget Lane; Lisa A Morrow; Nancy W Glynn; Debra K Weiner Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Madhav Goyal; Sonal Singh; Erica M S Sibinga; Neda F Gould; Anastasia Rowland-Seymour; Ritu Sharma; Zackary Berger; Dana Sleicher; David D Maron; Hasan M Shihab; Padmini D Ranasinghe; Shauna Linn; Shonali Saha; Eric B Bass; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Daniel C Cherkin; Karen J Sherman; Benjamin H Balderson; Andrea J Cook; Melissa L Anderson; Rene J Hawkes; Kelly E Hansen; Judith A Turner Journal: JAMA Date: 2016 Mar 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rinske A Gotink; Paula Chu; Jan J V Busschbach; Herbert Benson; Gregory L Fricchione; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Emily C Gathright; Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Julie DeCosta; Marissa L Donahue; Melissa M Feulner; Dean G Cruess; Rena R Wing; Michael P Carey; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2021-09 Impact factor: 5.556
Authors: Estelle T Higgins; Richard J Davidson; William W Busse; Danika R Klaus; Gina T Bednarek; Robin I Goldman; Jane Sachs; Melissa A Rosenkranz Journal: Brain Behav Immun Health Date: 2022-09-14