| Literature DB >> 30542543 |
Jie Liu1, Xia Sheng1, Fengying Guan1, Ke Li1, Dandan Wang1, Liping Chen1, Xinjian Feng1.
Abstract
Long, well-separated single crystal TiO2 nanowire (NW) arrays with rapid charge transport properties hold great promise in photoelectrochemical and energy storage devices. Synthesis variations to increase the NWs length generally result in the widening of the NWs and fusion at their roots which, in turn, increases the structural disorder and slows charge transport. As such, well-separated single-crystal TiO2 NW arrays with rapid charge transport properties have been limited to lengths of about 3-4 μm. In this work, by adjusting the HCl/DI-water ratio and adding specific organic ligands to the reaction solution that slow the lateral growth rate we achieve well-separated single-crystal rutile TiO2 NW arrays with a length of ∼10 μm and an aspect ratio of approximately 100. The charge transport is 100 times faster than that of nanoparticle films and remarkably exhibits length-independence, a behavior that can be attributed to the well-separated architecture. The synthesis strategy can be extended to the fabrication of other well-separated metal oxide NW arrays and represents an important tool in achieving high performance photoelectrochemical and electrical energy storage devices.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30542543 PMCID: PMC6237121 DOI: 10.1039/c8sc02335b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1Microstructure characterization of the long and well-separated TiO2 NWs. (a) and (b) are FE-SEM cross-sectional images of the NWs grown on a FTO-coated glass substrate at low and high magnifications, respectively. (c) TEM images of part of a single NW. Insets in panel (c) are, respectively, the HR-TEM image (c1) and SAED patterns (c2 and c3) recorded from their corresponding regions. The same crystallographic orientation at different areas indicates that the NW is a single crystal. (d) Length and diameter of the TiO2 NWs versus growth time. Lines are fits to the data, and error bars represent one standard deviation.
Reaction solution compositions, see Fig. 2
| No. |
|
|
|
|
|
| HCl (mL) | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| H2O (mL) | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2-Butuanone (mL) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.9 |
| Ethanol (mL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Best aspect ratio | 18.8 | 48.8 | 63.4 | 78.2 | 94.1 |
Fig. 2Diameter versus length of NWs grown using the indicated reaction solutions (see Table 1). Lines are fits to the data, and error bars represent one standard deviation.
Fig. 3Electron transport and recombination dynamics of NW-based photoelectrodes of different thicknesses. (a) Comparison of electron diffusion coefficients as a function of the photoelectron density for NW and NP based photoelectrodes. (b) Comparison of recombination lifetimes as a function of photoelectron density for NW based photoelectrodes.
Fig. 4Performance of the rutile TiO2 NW and NP-based solar cells. (a) Dependence of the electron collection efficiency on the NW length and NP-film thickness. (b) Comparison of the current density–voltage characteristics of the NW-based cells under AM 1.5 illumination. (c) Dependence of current density on the NW length and NP-film thickness.