Literature DB >> 30542528

Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease: A concise review.

Palma Manduzio1.   

Abstract

Transfusion-associated graft-versushost disease (TA-GVHD) represents a rare fatal event observed in immunocompromised patients and immunocompetent individuals. The main clinical features of this transfusion reaction are pancitopenia and multiorgan failure (skin, liver, gut). The possible pathogenesis includes donor T lymphocyte proliferation in blood, their engraftment and host tissue attack. The purpose of this narrative review was analyzing the international guidelines for irradiation of cellular blood components to prevent TA-GVHD. A literature search was conducted using PubMed articles published between January 2000 to July 2018. American, Australian, British and Japanese transfusion guidelines have been compared regarding clinical indications. The contribution of manuscripts has been focused on recipients of Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, severe cellular immunodeficient patients, fetuses and neonates, immunocompentent individuals. Furthermore, 348 cases of TA-GVHD in the last five decades have been documented according to a recent systematic review. The standard of care to prevent this complication is gamma or x irradiation of cellular blood products. New treatments with pathogen inactivation appear safe and effective against proliferating white blood cells and T cells. Further clinical and biological studies are necessary to better characterize immunocompetence of T cells and select alternative preventive strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  T lymphocytes; Transfusion-associated graft-versus- host disease; cellular blood products; immunodeficiency; irradiation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30542528      PMCID: PMC6240831          DOI: 10.4081/hr.2018.7724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Rep        ISSN: 2038-8322


Introduction

Cellular blood products which include red blood cells (RBC), platelets (PLT), granulocyte units and non-frozen plasma carry the risk for TA-GVHD.[1,2] This transfusion complication is documented in immunocompromised patients and in immunocompetent individuals.[1-3] Clinical features of the reaction include erythema, diarrhea, hepatitis, aplasia which occurred more commonly within 1-2 weeks of transfusion history. Laboratory features include pancytopenia, elevated alkaline phosphatase, increased transaminases and elevated bilirubin. A suggestive skin, liver or gut biopsy may recognize mononuclear infiltrates of lymphocytes. The possible pathogenesis includes donor T lymphocyte proliferation in blood components, their engraftment and host tissue attack (skin, liver, gut and bone marrow).[4,6] Chimerism or engraftment analysis of T lymphocytes through molecular assays (e.g. short tandem repeats analysis or a variable number of tandem repeat studies) may be helpful in case of suspect of the syndrome. [7,8] Alternatively, fluorescent in situ hybridization for the X and Y chromosomes may be considered in case of sex-mismatched between donor and recipient.[9] TA-GVHD cases has been reported in immunodeficient recipients (newborn, hematological patients, recipient of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and in immunocompetent individuals who receive blood components from a family member (donor and recipient were partially matched for Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA)) or in Japanese population (in which high degree of homozygosity of HLA has been documented). [1-9] Interestingly, no reports of the reaction has been noted in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) probably because the donor lymphocytes are not able to survive and proliferate adequately in this recipient and initiate the immune response which results in host tissue attack.[10] Certainly, unknown mechanisms may be involved in its pathogenesis.[1-9] The focus of this review was the analyis of the international guidelines for irradiation of blood components for clinical practice.[11-16] New data are recently published regarding alternative preventive methods.[17,18]

Methods and Results

The purpose of this narrative review was analyzing the international guidelines for irradiation of blood components to prevent TA-GVHD.[11-16]A literature search was conducted using Pub Med for articles published from January 2000 to July 2018 using the terms TA-GVHD and guidelines for irradiation of cellular blood productsand TA-GVHD and systematic review. Only articles published in English were considered. The contribution of manuscripts was focused on recipients of Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT), severe cellular immunodeficient patients, fetuses and neonates, immunocompetent individuals. The results were complemented by clinical experience. Characteristics of irradiated cellular blood products according to the international guidelines are summarized in Table 1.[11-16] Clinical indications and controversies regarding possible benefit of irradiation policy are discussed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.[11-16]
Table 1.

International guidelines for irradiation of cellular blood products, main features.

Main featuresAmerican (New York) 2012British 2011Australian and New Zealand 2011Japanese 2000
Blood productAll blood components should be irradiated with the exception of frozen RBC and frozen plasma and their products, peripheral blood stem cells. Bone marrow, cord blood, donor lymphocytes- RBC may be irradiated at any time up to 14 days after collection and must stored for a further 14 days- PLT can be irradiated at any stage during storage- Granulocyte should be irradiated and transfused as soon as possible- RBC may be irradiated at any time up to 14 days after collection and must stored for a further 14 days- PLT can be irradiated at any stage during storage- Granulocyte should be irradiated and transfused as soon as possibleAll blood components should be irradiated with the exception of frozen plasma and their products
Irradiation type and dose25 GyGamma or X irradiation of 25 Gy, no more than 50 GyGamma or X irradiation of 25 Gy15-50 Gy, no more than 50 Gy

RBC (red blood cells), PLT (platelets), Gy (Gray).

Table 2.

International guidelines for irradiation of cellular blood components, clinical indications.

Main featuresAmerican (New York) 2012British 2011Australian and New Zealand 2011Japanese 2000
Recipient of allogenic HSCTIndication- Irradiated blood componentsmust be started 7 days priorHSCT until 6 months post-transplant or lymphocytes >1×109/L- Indefinitely in case of chronic GVHDIrradiated blood components must be continued until 12 months post-transplant or lymphocytes >1×109/LIndication
Recipient of autologous HSCTIndicationIrradiated blood components should be started 7 days prior HSCT until 3 months or 6 months in case of TBI conditioning regimenIrradiated blood components must be started 7 days prior HSCT until 3 months or 6 months in case of TBI conditioning regimenIndication
Autologous stem cell harvestingIndicationIrradiated blood components should be started 7 days prior autologous stem cell harvestingIndicationNo data reported
Congenital T cell immunodeficienciesIndicationIndication in all severe syndromesIndicationIndication
Aplastic Anemia and anti-thymocyte globulinIndicationUntil lymphocyte >1×109/LPossible indicationIndication
Hodgkin LymphomaIndicationIndefinitelyIndication for at least 2 years after successful treatment or indefinitelyIndication
Purine analougeusIndicationIndefinitelyIndication for at least 1 year or indefinitelyIndication
AlentuzumabIndicationIndication includes hematological and autoimmune diseasesIndicationIndication
Intrauterine transfusion (IUT), exchange transfusion (ET), neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT)Blood for IUT and ET should be irradiated- Blood for IUT should be irradiated until 6 months after expected date of delivery- Blood for ET after IUT should be irradiated until 6 months after birth- RBC less than 5 days of age should be used for IUT or ET and transfused within 24 hours of irradiation- Blood for IUT and ETmust be irradiated - Platelets must be irradiated to treat NAIT until 6 months after birthNeonates require ET should receive irradiated RBC
Cellular blood components from relativesIndicationIndicationIndicationIndication

HSCT (hematopoietic stem cell transplantation), GVHD (graft-versus-host disease), TBI (total body irradiation), IUT (intrauterin transfusion), ET (exchange transfusion), NAIT (neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia).

Recipients of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

In allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) irradiation of blood components must be started at a least 7 days prior HSCT (the time of initiation of conditioning regimen) and continued until 6 or 12 months after the procedure or until lymphocytes is more than 1×109/L. This caution should be considered indefinitely in case of chronic graft-versus-host-disease or evidence of immune derangement according to the British, Australian and American guidelines. [11-16,19] In similar manner, irradiation of RBC or PLT units must be started at a least 7 days prior autologous HSCT (the time of initiation of conditioning regimen) until 3 months after the procedure or 6 months in case of total body irradiation conditioning. [11-16,20] Importantly, immune reconstitution is recognized a complex and multistep phenomenon in allogenic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.[21,22] In fact, only a quantitative analyisis may be performed by flow cytometry.[5,23]

Severe cellular immunodeficient patients

Neonates and infants must receive, definitely, irradiated blood components in case of congenital T cell immunodeficiencies or before a confirmed diagnosis.[11-14] Aplastic anemia treated with antithymocyte globulin must receive irradiated transfusions according to all analized guidelines.[11-15] In case of Hodgkin Lymphoma, a significantly T-cell immunosuppressed disease, all international guidelines confirm that patients should receive irradiated cellular blood components for at least 2 years following successful treatment or indefinitely according to the British and Australian guidelines, respectively.[11-15] In similar manner, patients treated with alemtuzumab or purine analogues (fludarabine, cladribrine, deoxycoformicin, bendamustine and clofarabine), represent another mandatory indication of the irradiation of blood components for 1 year or longer (following successful treatment).[11-15]

Fetuses and neonates

Irradiation of blood products is recommended for intrauterine transfusion (IUT) according to the international guidelines.[11-14,24,25] On the other hand, indication of irradiation of red blood cells for exchange transfusion (ET) after IUT varies in different countries.[11-14,24,25] In line with the international guidelines RBC less than 5 days of age must be used for IUT or ET and transfused within 24 hours of irradiation to reduce the risk of increased serum potassium level.[11-14] The IUT is an invasive procedure performed for the treatment of fetal anemia frequently due to severe haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) due to maternal alloimmune antibodies against red cell antigens of fetus (more commonly Rh, Kell, Duffy, Kidd and MNSs antigens) or parvovirus infection. The ET is a procedure performed to treat resistant icterus due to HDFN or severe anemia. Furthermore, Australian guidelines underline the importance of irradiated platelets in neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT).[11] This complication is due to maternal alloimmune antibodies against platelet antigens of fetus, more commonly against human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a). Prematures and low-birth weight babies may represent a possible high-risk category according to several expert opinions and guidelines.[24,25] Open question regards how long this caution should be considered after birth due to the possible immature thymus dysfunctions.[6,26] Briefly, the majority of guidelines suggest that irradiation policy should be continued for at least 6 months after birth.[11-14]

Immunocompetent individuals and other risk categories

Irradiation of cellular blood products is recommended for immuncompetent individuals who receive cellular blood components from relatives according to the international guidelines.[11-14] For clinical standpoint is mandatory the appropriate indications and use of blood products, avoid transfusions from first and second relatives. A systematic review of 348 cases published by Kopolovic, which includes all cases published in the last 5 decades without restriction of language, confirm that a small percentage (more specifically 5%) of the cases appears in non-high risk setting according to the current guidelines.[27] Few data regard the minimum number of lymphocytes necessary to cause TAGVHD. [11,12] According to Kopolovic and colleagues, cellular blood components involved in this fatal complication were whole blood (2×109 lymphocytes per unit),[28] leukoreduced components (5×106 lymphocytes per unit)[28] and component age inferior to 48 hours.[27] Furthermore, this review underlines that HLA antigens shared by the recipient were responsible of TA-GVHD observed in immunocompent recipient because donor lymphocytes of similar HLA are not recognized as foreign and destroyed by the immune system of recipient.[27]

Discussion

A significant decrease of this complication has been noted in Japan since the introduction of irradiation in 1998.[29] In addition, only 2 fatal TA-GVHD were recognized in UK from 1999 to 2013.[30] In similar manner, 3 fatal events were documented in USA from 2005 to 2013.[6] Gamma or X irradiation of blood products is considered the gold standard to prevent the complication due to the capability of damage DNA of white blood cells (WBC).[11-14] The maximum expiration time of red blood cell post-irradiation varies from 28 to 14 days according to the American and British Standards, respectively. [16,30] New preventive treatments with pathogen inactivation appear effective against proliferating WBC and T cells and useful to treat all cellular blood products (RBC, platelets, whole blood, plasma). More recently, Fast L. summarized the main technologies (e.g. solvent detergent, methylene blue, UV-light etc) which interfere with the replication of pathogens and leucocytes through nucleic acid modifications.[18] Furthermore, a large prospective study was recently published regarding transfusion of platelet components prepared with amotosalen- UVA photochemical treatment.[19] Limits of irradiation of RBC products include reduction of the expiration date and the increase of its cost. In addition, RBC irradiation is time consuming, rises the serum potassium level and causes hemolysis therefore it favors possible complications in neonates, renal failure or in massive transfusions.[1,6,31] No modification of expiration date or quality of platelet units have been recognized.[32] Limits of new technologies are the paucity of data regarding the long-term follow-up.[18,19] Controversies regard which cellular blood products are more commonly involved in the reaction and additional possible risk categories for TA-GVHD remain after literature search.[11-14] Granulocyte units, which contain more lymphocytes (10×109 lymphocytes per unit),[28] represent a cellular blood component used in selected cases.[32-35] Similarly, fresh whole blood (2×109 lymphocytes per unit),[28] which represents a possible therapy for trauma resuscitation, [36,37] should cause the complication due to a recognized decrease of lymphocytes activity after 2 weeks.[2] Further risk categories may include: non-hodgkin lymphoma treated with novel drugs which impact on the cellular immune system[38] and acute leukemia which receive purine analogs (e.g. clofarabine and fludarabine). [11-14] In addition, in some cases it is hard to confirm the clinical suspect of TA-GVHD (due to attenuated manifestations of the syndrome, confounding factors (infections, autoimmunity), techinical issues of HLA type (pancytopenia)).

Conclusions

In populations in which more homogeneity of HLA exists, such as documented in Japan, a stricter policy regarding irradiation of cellular blood products is successful.[29] Higher risk categories for TAGVHD are recipients of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, severe cellular immunodeficient patients, fetuses and neonates who receive intrauterin transfusions, immunocompetent patients who receive cellular components from blood relatives. [11-14] Controversies remain regard which cellular blood products are more commonly involved in the reaction and additional risk categories for TA-GVHD [27,38] Haemovigilance, a systematic surveillance of adverse reactions and adverse events related to transfusion, is an effective tool for improving transfusion practice internationally. [39,40] The gold standard procedure to prevent this complication is 25 gamma or x irradiation of blood components.[11-14] New preventive treatments with pathogen inactivation appear effective against proliferating white blood cells and T cells.[18,19] Further clinical and biological studies are necessary to better characterize immunocompetence of T cells and compare preventive approaches for TA-GVHD.[41-44]
Table 3.

International guidelines for irradiation of cellular blood products, controversies.

Diagnosis or treatmentBritish 2011Australian and New Zealand 2011Japanese 2000
Acute LeukemiaNo indicationPossible indicationPossible indication
Chronic Myeloid LeukemiaNo data reportedPossible indicationNo data reported
Haemophilia and thalassemiaNo data reportedNo indicationNo data reported
Massive transfusionsNo data reportedPossible indicationIndication
Cardiovascular surgeryNo indicationPossible indicationIndication
Solid organ tranplantationNo indicated unless alentuzumab useNo indicationIndication in immunocompromised recipients
Solid tumorsNo indicationNo indication- Chemotherapy or radiotherapy in solid tumor- Surgical operation for cancers
Non-hodgkin LymphomaNo indicationIt may be a possible indication in lymphopenic (lymphocytes <0.5×109/L) patients who receive chemotherapy or radiotherapyPossible indication
T cell LymphomaNo data reportedPossible indicationNo data reported
RituximabNo indicationNo indicationNo data reported
High dose steroidsNo data reportedPossible indicationIndication
Acquired immunodeficiency syndromeNo indicationNo indicationNo data reported
ElderlyNo data reportedNo data reportedIndication in recipient of blood transfusion of >65 years old
Premature babies and low-birth weight babiesNo data reportedPrematures babies (<28 weeks) and low-weight babies (<900 gr) may be a possible indication for at least 7 monthsLow-weight babies may be a possible indication
  35 in total

1.  Immunology at Yale.

Authors:  C A Janeway; R A Flavell
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.829

2.  Gamma-irradiation of blood products following autologous stem cell transplantation: surveillance of the policy of 35 centers.

Authors:  B Weiss; M Hoffmann; C Anders; P Hellstern; N Schmitz; M Uppenkamp
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 3.  Haemovigilance in the United Kingdom and Europe.

Authors:  Dorothy Stainsby
Journal:  Hematol J       Date:  2004

4.  Neonatal transfusions.

Authors:  H V New; S J Stanworth; C P Engelfriet; H W Reesink; Z K McQuilten; H F Savoia; E M Wood; S Olyntho; F Trigo; S Wendel; Y Lin; H Hume; J Petäjä; T Krusius; S Villa; S Ghirardello; J von Lindern; A Brand; J E Hendrickson; C D Josephson; R G Strauss; N L C Luban; W Paul
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  Rapid molecular cytogenetic diagnosis of transfusion associated graft-versus-host disease by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).

Authors:  Meltem O Akay; Gokhan Temiz; Hava U Teke; Eren Gunduz; Mustafa F Acikalin; Serap Isiksoy; Beyhan Durak; Zafer Gulbas
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 1.764

6.  Guidelines on transfusion for fetuses, neonates and older children.

Authors:  Helen V New; Jennifer Berryman; Paula H B Bolton-Maggs; Carol Cantwell; Elizabeth A Chalmers; Tony Davies; Ruth Gottstein; Andrea Kelleher; Sailesh Kumar; Sarah L Morley; Simon J Stanworth
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 7.  A review of transfusion practice before, during, and after hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.

Authors:  James L Gajewski; Viviana V Johnson; S Gerald Sandler; Antoine Sayegh; Thomas R Klumpp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  D M Dwyre; P V Holland
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 2.144

9.  Analysis of 66 patients definitive with transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease and the effect of universal irradiation of blood.

Authors:  S Uchida; K Tadokoro; M Takahashi; H Yahagi; M Satake; T Juji
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.019

Review 10.  Granulocyte transfusions for treating infections in people with neutropenia or neutrophil dysfunction.

Authors:  Lise J Estcourt; Simon J Stanworth; Sally Hopewell; Carolyn Doree; Marialena Trivella; Edwin Massey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-29
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Nanoscale Changes on RBC Membrane Induced by Storage and Ionizing Radiation: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Andrea M López-Canizales; Aracely Angulo-Molina; Adriana Garibay-Escobar; Erika Silva-Campa; Miguel A Mendez-Rojas; Karla Santacruz-Gómez; Mónica Acosta-Elías; Beatriz Castañeda-Medina; Diego Soto-Puebla; Osiris Álvarez-Bajo; Alexel Burgara-Estrella; Martín Pedroza-Montero
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Missed irradiation of cellular blood components for vulnerable patients: Insights from 10 years of SHOT data.

Authors:  Johnathon Elliot; Shruthi Narayan; Debbi Poles; Victoria Tuckley; Paula H B Bolton-Maggs
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.