| Literature DB >> 30542468 |
Hui Wang1, Guangwen Shi2, Ming Li3, Hong Fan3, Hong Ma4, Li Sheng5.
Abstract
Fluctuations of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF) in endometrial receptivity were detected. Seventy-two patients receiving in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) for the first time in Yantaishan Hospital from July 2015 to September 2015 due to infertility were selected. The serum and follicular fluid of patients in ovulation-promoting cycle were collected; the levels of IL-1β and HB-EGF in serum and follicular fluid were detected via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the levels of serum estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were detected. The endometria in early follicular phase and middle luteal phase were collected, and the mRNA expression levels of IL-1β and HB-EGF were evaluated by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Patients were divided into two groups, and the implantation group (n=33) and the non-implantation group (n=39), according to whether embryos were implanted and the general data. In IVF-ET, the levels of IL-1β and HB-EGF in follicular fluid and middle luteal phase, the level of serum IL-1β on human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) day and embryo transfer (ET) day, the levels of E2, FSH and LH on HCG day in implantation group were obviously higher than those in non-implantation group (p<0.05); the level of P on ET day in implantation group was significantly higher than that in non-implantation group (p<0.05); the expression levels of IL-1β and HB-EGF in endometrium in middle luteal phase in implantation group were higher than those in non-implantation group (p<0.05); the expression levels of IL-1β and HB-EGF in endometrium were positively correlated with the levels of E2 and P, and endometrial thickness (p<0.05). IL-1β and HB-EGF may improve the endometrial receptivity to embryo, thus affecting the embryo implantation rate, through the synergistic action with E2 and P, so they may be the indexes of predicting the IVF-ET pregnancy outcome.Entities:
Keywords: endometrial receptivity; heparin-binding epidermal growth factor; in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer; interleukin-1β
Year: 2018 PMID: 30542468 PMCID: PMC6257333 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6840
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Primer sequences.
| Molecule | Primer (5′3′) |
|---|---|
| IL-1β | F: AAT GAT GGC TTA TTA CAG TGG C |
| R: TGT AGT GGT GGT CGG AGA TT | |
| HB-EGF | F: ACA AGG AGG AGC ACG GGA AAA G |
| R: CGA TGA CCA GCA GAC AGA CAG ATG | |
| β-actin | F: CAC AAG TCA CAC TTC ACA |
| R: CTA TCA CCT CGT GCT CT |
F, forward; R, reverse; IL-1β, interleukin-1β; HB-EGF, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor.
Figure 1.Pathogenesis of infertility patients.
Comparisons of general conditions between implantation group and non-implantation group.
| Implantation group (n=33) | Non-implantation group (n=39) | t-value | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 30.12±4.32 | 29.56±4.51 | 0.81 | 0.31 |
| Duration of infertility (years) | 4.92±3.12 | 4.84±3.73 | 0.63 | 0.65 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.01±2.45 | 21.71±2.14 | 0.54 | 0.69 |
| Gn dosage (n) | 37.76±8.31 | 38.22±9.17 | 0.71 | 0.62 |
| No. of retrieved oocytes (n) | 14.45±8.24 | 12.28±10.89 | 1.33 | 0.16 |
| No. of transferred embryos (n) | 2.14±0.53 | 2.03±0.65 | 1.20 | 0.24 |
| No. of high-quality embryos (n) | 8.41±4.63 | 8.32±4.58 | 0.98 | 0.27 |
| No. of frozen embryos (n) | 5.46±5.12 | 3.97±4.26 | 1.25 | 0.19 |
BMI, body mass index.
IL-1β and HB-EGF levels in serum and follicular fluid of patients in the two groups.
| Serum | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | D3 | HCG day | OR day | ET day | FF |
| Implantation group (n=33) | |||||
| IL-1β (ng/ml) | 17.26±7.49 | 162.86±53.27 | 71.21±24.65 | 39.46±28.18 | 67.02±24.20 |
| HB-EGF (pg/ml) | 312.25±255.13 | 323.34±267.17 | 337.28±263.49 | 361.10±285.26 | 350.42±285.26 |
| Non-implantation group (n=39) | |||||
| IL-1β (ng/ml) | 15.32±7.37 | 82.86±35.34 | 33.91±14.53 | 60.46±25.12 | 39.08±18.26 |
| HB-EGF (pg/ml) | 272.28±195.06 | 288.43±207.62 | 295.29±213.87 | 285.14±205.83 | 230±285.26 |
IL-1β, interleukin-1β; HB-EGF, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor; D3, 3rd day in menstrual cycle; HCG day, day of injecting HCG; OR day, day of oocyte retrieval; ET day, day of embryo transfer; FF, follicular fluid.
Expression levels of IL-1β and HB-EGF mRNA in early follicular phase and middle luteal phase in the two groups of patients.
| Group | Early follicular phase | t-value | P-value | Middle luteal phase | t-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1β mRNA expression level | ||||||
| Implantation group (n=33) | 0.35±0.18 | 1.45 | 0.09 | 0.92±0.20 | 6.41 | 0.01 |
| Non-implantation group (n=39) | 0.23±0.09 | 0.54±0.17 | ||||
| HB-EGF mRNA expression level | ||||||
| Implantation group (n=33) | 0.61±0.24 | 1.62 | 0.08 | 2.43±0.59 | 7.59 | 0.00 |
| Non-implantation group (n=39) | 0.50±0.17 | 1.12±0.58 | ||||
IL-1β, interleukin-1β; HB-EGF, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor.
Comparison of serum hormone levels at different time-points between the two groups of patients.
| Group | E2 (pg/ml) | P (ng/ml) | FSH (mIU/ml) | LH (mIU/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implantation group (n=33) | ||||
| D3 | 56.12±10.23 | 0.65±0.46 | 4.28±1.47 | 3.13±1.39 |
| HCG day | 2893.52±1068.34 | 0.86±0.57 | 24.93±9.08 | 139.06±53.45 |
| ET day | 896.47±428.51 | 27.58±13.94 | 13.87±11.95 | 17.01±5.28 |
| Non-implantation group (n=39) | ||||
| D3 | 55.34±11.82 | 0.63±0.48 | 4.31±1.50 | 3.32±1.27 |
| HCG day | 1538.26±786.26 | 0.80±0.51 | 12.98±7.02 | 101.64±32.16 |
| ET day | 894.54±378.38 | 21.56±7.25 | 10.62±9.59 | 15.17±7.24 |
E2, estradiol; P, progesterone; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; D3, 3rd day in menstrual cycle; HCG day, day of injecting HCG; ET day, day of embryo transfer.
Figure 2.Expression levels of IL-1β and HB-EGF in middle luteal phase in different endometrial thickness. The mRNA expression level of IL-1β in the endometrium of the two groups in middle luteal phase has a statistically significant difference, *p<0.05 vs. intimal thickness <9 mm; the mRNA expression level of HB-EGF in the endometrium of the two groups in middle luteal phase has a statistically significant difference, *p<0.05 vs. intimal thickness <9 mm.
Pearson's correlation analysis of IL-1β and HB-EGF expression levels in endometrium in middle luteal phase with endometrial thickness and E2 and P.
| Variables | Endometrial thickness (mm) | E2 (pg/ml) | P (ng/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1β in endometrium | |||
| r | 0.83 | 0.35 | 0.42 |
| p | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| HB-EGF in endometrium | |||
| r | 0.72 | 0.29 | 0.36 |
| p | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
IL-1β, interleukin-1β; HB-EGF, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor; E2, estradiol; P, progesterone.