| Literature DB >> 30542459 |
Feng Han1,2, Puxun Tian1,2, Xinxin Xia3, Yuxiang Wang1,2, Meng Dou1,2, Jin Zheng1,2, Xiaoming Ding1,2, Wujun Xue1,2, Chenguang Ding1,2.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the possibility of increasing the remote patency rate of allogeneic vessel transplantation through studying the effects of N-ethyl-N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide and polyethyleneimine (EDC-PEI) heparinization on allogeneic vascular antigens and inflammation levels. Forty rats were randomly divided into the control group, the EDC group, the PEI group and the EDC-PEI group. The rat abdominal aorta was used as the object of study, and the transplanted blood vessels were pretreated with EDC as the water-soluble cross-linking agent and PEI as the heparin-coated carrier. A rat abdominal aorta allogeneic transplantation model was established. Ultrasonic examination was used for observation of patency of proximal and distal anastomosis in each group. The tissue repair after abdominal aorta transplantation in each group was examined by H&E staining. The biomechanics, denaturation temperature and blasting strength of each group were compared. The levels of IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α in serum of rats were measured by ELISA method, and the expression of MHC-II and α-GAL antigens in blood vessels were detected by immunohistochemistry. There were different degrees of thickening and inflammatory cell aggregation in the abdominal aorta of rats in the control, EDC and PEI groups, but there was no obvious lesion in the EDC-PEI group. Compared with the four groups, the mechanical characteristics of the EDC group decreased significantly, and the stenosis rate of anastomotic stoma in the EDC group was higher than that in the EDC-PEI and PEI groups (P<0.05). The denaturation temperature of the PEI group was lower than that of the EDC and EDC-PEI groups (P<0.05). The mechanical property and vascular bursting strength in the EDC-PEI group were similar to those in the control group. At the same time, it has more significant advantages than the other three groups in removing the vascular antigens MHC-II and α-GAL and reducing the level of inflammatory reaction, thus increasing the remote patency rate of allogeneic vascular transplantation. The inflammatory response and vascular antigenicity after transplantation are effectively reduced via the rat abdominal aorta transplantation model treated with allogeneic EDC-PEI heparinization, which has a higher remote patency rate.Entities:
Keywords: arterial transplantation; atherosclerotic disease; inflammation; prognosis and outcome; vascular antigens
Year: 2018 PMID: 30542459 PMCID: PMC6257806 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Comparison of pathological characteristics in each group. Control group: vascular media thickening, inflammatory cell infiltration. EDC group: thickening of vascular mesenchymal cells. PEI group: partially elastic fiber glass-like denaturation. EDC-PEI group: no significant lesion of vascular endothelial cells.
Comparisons of distal anastomosis peak flow and stenosis rate in each group.
| Groups (n=24) | Peak flow (cm/sec) | Stenosis rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 169.8±21.6 | 33.3 |
| EDC | 148.2±23.2 | 8.3[ |
| PEI | 128.3±20.2[ | 0[ |
| EDC-PEI | 127.2±18.8[ | 0[ |
P<0.05
P<0.01.
Comparison of mechanical property in each group.
| Groups (n=24) | Elastic modulus (MPa) | Maximum tensile strength (MPa) | Maximum load (N) | Stretch rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 45.23±2.45 | 10.26±1.55 | 42.51±2.58 | 34.56±2.62 |
| EDC | 28.67±3.47[ | 6.23±1.19[ | 16.62±1.42[ | 33.63±3.29 |
| PEI | 30.09±1.83[ | 5.15±0.64[ | 25.56±1.77[ | 35.35±2.67 |
| EDC-PEI | 35.23±3.05[ | 7.16±0.32[ | 27.14±2.01[ | 37.43±2.72 |
P<0.05.
Figure 2.Comparison of vascular bursting strength in each group. *P<0.01 compared with the control group. #P>0.05 compared with the control group. EDC, N-ethyl-N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide; PEI, polyethyleneimine.
Figure 3.Comparison of denaturation temperature in each group. *P<0.05 compared with the control group. #P>0.05 compared with the control group. EDC, N-ethyl-N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide; PEI, polyethyleneimine.
IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α in each group.
| Groups (n=24) | IL-1 (pg/ml) | IL-6 (pg/ml) | TNF-α (pg/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 152.51±20.05 | 68.36±15.55 | 48.46±12.45 |
| EDC | 118.28±16.85[ | 47.63±12.79[ | 34.14±14.35[ |
| PEI | 132.63±22.65[ | 76.65±17.74[ | 54.67±14.50[ |
| EDC-PEI | 72.52±15.21[ | 36.12±14.05[ | 28.26±10.42[ |
P<0.05 vs. the control group.
P>0.05, vs. the EDC group.
Figure 4.MHC-II antigen level (immunohistochemistry). (A) Control group (vascular endothelial cell MHC-II is stained brown). (B) EDC group (vascular endothelial cell MHC-II is stained negatively). (C) PEI group (vascular endothelial cell MHC-II is stained negatively). (D) EDC-PEI group (vascular endothelial cell MHC-II is stained negatively).
Comparison of MHC-II and α-GAL antigen levels in each group (ELISA).
| Groups (n=24) | MHC-II | α-GAL (U/mg) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.2875±0.0245 | 1.26±0.55 |
| EDC | 0.2163±0.0123[ | 0.23±0.19[ |
| PEI | 0.2354±0.0212[ | 0.15±0.14[ |
| EDC-PEI | 0.2272±0.0078[ | 0.16±0.15[ |
P<0.05
P<0.01.