| Literature DB >> 30542423 |
Yi-Cheng Zhu1, Yuan Zhang1, Shu-Hao Deng1, Quan Jiang1, Deng-Shan Wang2.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between histologic grade and shear-wave elastography in evaluating invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (NST). A total of 84 breast lesions in 80 patients (age range, 32-64 years) were retrospectively evaluated. The patients underwent B-mode ultrasound and virtual touch tissue quantification diagnosis. A semi-quantitative method was then applied in order to determine the histologic grade of the invasive carcinoma of NST according to the grading system published by the World Health Organization. Among the 84 breast lesions, 14 (16.7%) were classified as Grade I, while 29 (34.5%) and 41 (48.8%) were determined to be of Grade II and Grade III, respectively. The size of the breast lesions increased with the increase in histological grade (P<0.001). In addition, 29.3% of the Grade-III breast lesions exhibited acoustic enhancement, while the majority of the Grade-I breast lesions (78.6%) exhibited acoustic shadowing (P=0.002). Furthermore, a higher histopathological grade was closely correlated with a higher mean, minimum and maximum shear-wave velocity value (P<0.05). In conclusion, regarding the evaluation of invasive breast carcinoma of NST, the histologic grade was strongly correlated with tissue stiffness; a higher histologic grade was associated with a harder lesion. Therefore, shear-wave elastography may provide important clinical reference values.Entities:
Keywords: breast neoplasms; histologic grading; invasive ductal carcinoma; shear-wave elastography; ultrasonography
Year: 2018 PMID: 30542423 PMCID: PMC6257494 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Flowchart of patient selection. BL, breast lesion; NST, no special type; US, ultrasound.
Ultrasonic features of all of the invasive carcinomas of NST of different histopathological grades.
| Characteristic | Grade I (n=14) | Grade II (n=29) | Grade III (n=41) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.57±8.15 | 48.59±7.99 | 44.73±7.15 | 0.045 |
| Position | 0.605 | |||
| Right | 8 (57.1) | 12 (41.4) | 18 (43.9) | |
| Left | 6 (42.9) | 17 (58.6) | 23 (56.1) | |
| Lesion size (mm) | 12.90 (10.90–15.65) | 22.90 (18.25–31.9) | 25.90 (19.25–34.85) | <0.001 |
| Margin | 0.089 | |||
| Well-defined | 0 (0.0) | 2 (6.9) | 8 (19.5) | |
| Poorly defined | 14 (100.0) | 27 (93.1) | 33 (80.5) | |
| Echotexture | 0.944 | |||
| Heterogeneous | 10 (71.4) | 22 (75.9) | 31 (75.6) | |
| Homogeneous | 4 (28.6) | 7 (24.1) | 10 (24.4) | |
| Halo sign | 0.692 | |||
| Present | 4 (28.6) | 11 (37.9) | 17 (41.5) | |
| Absent | 10 (71.4) | 18 (62.1) | 24 (58.5) | |
| Calcification | 0.443 | |||
| No | 6 (42.9) | 11 (37.9) | 11 (26.8) | |
| Yes | 8 (57.1) | 18 (62.1) | 30 (73.2) | |
| Posterior acoustic feature | 0.002 | |||
| None | 2 (14.3) | 7 (24.1) | 7 (17.1) | |
| Shadowing | 11 (78.6) | 14 (48.3) | 12 (29.3) | |
| Enhancement | 1 (7.1) | 1 (3.4) | 15 (36.6) | |
| Mixed | 0 (0.0) | 7 (24.1) | 7 (17.1) |
Values are expressed as n (%), the median (interquartile range) or the mean ± standard deviation. NST, no special type.
Figure 2.Boxplot of SWV values for breast lesions of different histologic grades. The box plot displays boxes bordered by the 25th and 75th percentiles with a median line at the 50th percentile; whiskers represent the upper and lower adjacent values. *P<0.05 vs. SWV (min) Grade I. #P<0.05 vs. SWV (mean) Grade I. &P<0.05 vs. SWV (max) Grade I. SWV, shear-wave velocity.
Figure 3.Evaluation of SWV values in a case of invasive carcinoma of no special type in the right breast of a 58-year-old female patient. (A) The SWV of the surrounding breast tissue was 0.88 m/sec, while (B) the SWV of the mass was X.XX m/sec. The non-applicable situation occurred when the screen displayed ‘X.XX m/sec’, which may be interpreted as the tissue being either extremely soft or hard as it exceeded the range of the SWV value. The value was then denoted as either 9.1 or 0 m/sec, depending on whether it was the solid portion or the cystic portion, respectively, once technical failures or other potential factors, including the patient's breathing, were ruled out. In this case, the two interpreters agreed to denote the value as 9.1 m/sec. (C) In terms of histologic grading, the lesion was classified as Grade II (H&E; magnification, ×100). SWV, shear-wave velocity.
SWV values in correlation with histological grade and lesion size.
| SWV | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Value | Minimum | Mean | Maximum |
| Histologic grade | |||
| 1 | 3.43 (2.43–4.03) | 4.31 (2.56–4.54) | 4.84 (2.69–5.40) |
| 2 | 3.60 (3.40–4.42) | 4.37 (3.98–4.58) | 4.84 (4.56–5.70) |
| 3 | 5.60 (4.62–6.10) | 6.32 (5.35–6.98) | 7.04 (6.06–7.81) |
| P-value | 0.011 | 0.032 | 0.032 |
| Size (mm) | |||
| <20 | 3.30 (2.43–4.43) | 4.71 (3.76–6.72) | 7.37 (6.20–8.60) |
| ≥20 | 3.90 (3.30–5.05) | 6.02 (4.92–7.28) | 5.24 (4.37–6.38) |
| P-value | 0.411 | 0.525 | 0.482 |
Values are expressed as Q50 (interquartile range). SWV, shear-wave velocity.