Literature DB >> 30541807

Transitioning to academia: Exploring the experience of new family medicine faculty members at the beginning of their academic careers.

Michelle Levy1, Sudha Koppula2, Judith Belle Brown3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the experience of new family medicine faculty members at the beginning of their academic careers and determine what factors might facilitate their transition to an academic role in family medicine.
DESIGN: Qualitative, phenomenologic study of new academic family physicians.
SETTING: Eight Canadian departments of family medicine. PARTICIPANTS: English-speaking, full-time academic family physicians who had been in their first faculty position in a Canadian department of family medicine for 1 to 5 years.
METHODS: Data were collected using semistructured, in-depth interviews that were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis employed an immersion and crystallization technique. The transcriptions were reviewed in an iterative and interpretive manner. Thirteen interviews were performed before saturation was reached. MAIN
FINDINGS: The following 3 key themes were identified in relation to the experience of being a new academic family medicine faculty member: lack of or inadequate orientation; the challenges associated with transitioning to academia; and balancing the demands of the role. Orientation was often lacking or suboptimal, with participants left to navigate the transition process alone. The challenges associated with the transition to academia included the realities of clinical work and uncertainties about how to incorporate the various aspects of the new role into members' reality (eg, research). Trying to balance the demands of the academic role (eg, committee involvement, manual reviews), as well as finding work-life balance, was overwhelming.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the factors that might help recruit and retain academic faculty members in family medicine, as well as help them build successful academic careers. Orientation for these new members is an area that requires more attention. Clear parameters around division of time, support, and expectations for advancement should be explained at the beginning of new faculty members' academic appointments. Effective mentoring might help new faculty members have a more successful transition and reduce the risk of feeling overwhelmed and considering leaving academia. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30541807      PMCID: PMC6371872     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  23 in total

1.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Stories from early-career women physicians who have left academic medicine: a qualitative study at a single institution.

Authors:  Rachel B Levine; Fenny Lin; David E Kern; Scott M Wright; Joseph Carrese
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Views of family medicine department Chairs about mentoring junior faculty.

Authors:  Richelle J Koopman; C Carolyn Thiedke
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 4.  A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine.

Authors:  Dario Sambunjak; Sharon E Straus; Ana Marusic
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Retention of family medicine faculty development fellows in academic medicine.

Authors:  F P Kohrs; A G Mainous
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Ticket on the Titanic. Perils and pitfalls of junior faculty development.

Authors:  J E Graham
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Faculty development in Canadian medical schools: a 10-year update.

Authors:  P J McLeod; Y Steinert; L Nasmith; L Conochie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Faculty development in family medicine. A reassessment.

Authors:  Y Steinert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Women in medicine: the challenge of finding balance.

Authors:  Sophia Mobilos; Melissa Chan; Judith Belle Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Outcomes of a comprehensive faculty development program for local, full-time faculty.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Morzinski; Deborah E Simpson
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  2 in total

1.  Scholar Map: Academic family physician career planning.

Authors:  Amanda Ramdyal; Henry Yu-Hin Siu
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2. 

Authors:  Amanda Ramdyal; Henry Yu-Hin Siu
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.