Martine Stead1, Nathan Critchlow2, Rupal Patel3, Anne Marie MacKintosh2, Fay Sullivan3. 1. Institute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. Electronic address: martine.stead@stir.ac.uk. 2. Institute for Social Marketing, Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. 3. NatCen Social Research, 35 Northampton Square, London, EC1V 0AX, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uptake of influenza vaccination by healthcare workers (HCWs) may be related to how influenza campaigns are implemented. This study explores differences in annual influenza campaign implementation between NHS trusts (healthcare organisations) with higher and lower vaccine uptake. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey with influenza campaign staff in 2016/2017 in 87 NHS trusts in England. The survey measured vaccination policy and uptake target, staff involvement, accessibility, use of peer vaccinators, communication strategies, strategies to address HCW concerns, use of incentives, and management support. The analysis considered implementation differences between higher (n Z 50) and lower (n Z 37) uptake trusts. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Higher uptake trusts were more likely to set higher uptake targets, involve a broader range of staff groups in the campaign, and make the vaccine easy to access by core or hard-toreach HCWs. Higher uptake trusts were also more likely to use a greater range of communication strategies, provide real-time feedback on uptake, provide a greater range of incentives to be vaccinated, and have vaccine uptake considered important by managers. Successful influenza vaccination programmes are multifaceted and involve implementation factors at a strategic, organisational, logistical, and personnel level. Lower uptake trusts could improve uptake by identifying and implementing examples of best practice from higher uptake trusts.
BACKGROUND: Uptake of influenza vaccination by healthcare workers (HCWs) may be related to how influenza campaigns are implemented. This study explores differences in annual influenza campaign implementation between NHS trusts (healthcare organisations) with higher and lower vaccine uptake. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey with influenza campaign staff in 2016/2017 in 87 NHS trusts in England. The survey measured vaccination policy and uptake target, staff involvement, accessibility, use of peer vaccinators, communication strategies, strategies to address HCW concerns, use of incentives, and management support. The analysis considered implementation differences between higher (n Z 50) and lower (n Z 37) uptake trusts. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Higher uptake trusts were more likely to set higher uptake targets, involve a broader range of staff groups in the campaign, and make the vaccine easy to access by core or hard-toreach HCWs. Higher uptake trusts were also more likely to use a greater range of communication strategies, provide real-time feedback on uptake, provide a greater range of incentives to be vaccinated, and have vaccine uptake considered important by managers. Successful influenza vaccination programmes are multifaceted and involve implementation factors at a strategic, organisational, logistical, and personnel level. Lower uptake trusts could improve uptake by identifying and implementing examples of best practice from higher uptake trusts.
Authors: Nabil J Awadalla; Hassan Mohammed Al-Musa; Khalid Mohammed Al-Musa; Abdulmajeed Mohammed Asiri; Ahmed Ali Albariqi; Hussam Mohammed Majrashi; Ahmed Ali Alasim; Abdulrahman Saeed Almuslah; Turki Khalid Alshehri; Mohammed Ali AlFlan; Ahmed A Mahfouz Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2019-10-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Gary Mitchell; Laurence Leonard; Gillian Carter; Olinda Santin; Christine Brown Wilson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 3.240