Literature DB >> 3054111

Sequential sampling in clinical cytogenetics: a quality control viewpoint.

M A De Arce1, S P McManus.   

Abstract

We have observed that there is some resemblance between the problems of sampling in industrial quality control and the process of diagnosis of mixed cell populations in cytogenetics. This resemblance enabled us to draw from the methodology of the former science to solve some diagnostic problems in the latter. We considered which of the several sampling procedures available for quality control would be more efficient and more suitable in clinical cytogenetics, concluding that 'sequential sampling' combines both features. We also studied the effect that some abnormalities due to technical factors had on sample size required to reach a diagnosis with a given level of confidence. We give a set of tables for sequential sampling in diagnostic laboratories, illustrating their use in discriminating between mosaicism and pseudomosaicism in prenatal diagnosis and in the diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome. Finally, we discuss the merits of sequential sampling as shown here, comparing it with the current method used in cytogenetics to exclude chromosomal mosaicism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3054111      PMCID: PMC1051539          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.25.9.609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  11 in total

Review 1.  Mosaics and chimaeras.

Authors:  C E Ford
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Technical and biological aspects of pseudomosaicism and mosaicism.

Authors:  P Møller; E Ormerod
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism: tables of 90%, 95% and 99% confidence limits and comments on use.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Exclusion of chromosomal mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  U Claussen; H Schäfer; H J Trampisch
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Tables for the cytogenetic study of fragile X chromosomes for diagnostic purposes.

Authors:  M A De Arce
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Aneuploidy and ageing: chromosome studies on a random sample of the population using G-banding.

Authors:  S M Galloway; K E Buckton
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1978

7.  On the frequency of telomeric chromosomal changes induced by culture conditions suitable for fragile X expression.

Authors:  P Steinbach; G Barbi; T Böller
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Frequency of fragile X chromosome in normal females.

Authors:  D Abuelo; K Castree; S Pueschel; T Padre-Mendoza; K Zolnierz
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  On the significance of true trisomy 20 mosaicism in amniotic fluid culture.

Authors:  M Djalali; P Steinbach; E Schwinger; G Schwanitz; U Tettenborn; M Wolf
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Chromosomal breakage in normal and fragile X subjects using low folate culture conditions.

Authors:  M Vekemans; B Popovich; D Rosenblatt; P Monroe
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.