| Literature DB >> 30541097 |
Yvonne Lamers1,2, Amanda J MacFarlane3, Deborah L O'Connor4,5, Bénédicte Fontaine-Bisson6,7.
Abstract
The Government of Canada and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada both recommend a daily multivitamin supplement containing 400 µg folic acid (FA) for the primary prevention of neural tube defects among low-risk women from before conception and throughout lactation. Prenatal supplements marketed and prescribed in Canada typically exceed the recommended dose, usually providing ≥1000 µg FA/d. This high daily dose, coupled with staple-food FA fortification, has resulted in the observation of very high blood folate concentrations among reproductive-aged women consuming FA-containing supplements. The long-term consequences of high folate status on fetal development are unknown; however, evidence from animal studies and some human epidemiologic data suggest potential adverse consequences. To address this issue, a workshop was convened with the overall goal to identify challenges and solutions to aligning supplemental FA intakes with current evidence-based recommendations. Thirty-eight stakeholders from academia, industry, government, and health professional groups participated. Group discussions facilitated the identification and prioritization of 5 key challenges for which solutions and implementation strategies were proposed. The 5 themes encompassed clarity and harmonization of evidence-based guidelines, reformulation or relabeling of FA-containing supplements, access to FA for all women, knowledge dissemination strategies and education of the public and health care professionals, and attitude change to overcome the perception of "more is better." A combination of the proposed implementation strategies involving all key stakeholders and directed to health care professionals and the public may enable a sustainable change to align FA intake during the periconceptional period with evidence-based recommendations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30541097 PMCID: PMC6290364 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0002-9165 Impact factor: 7.045
Recommendations for prenatal FA supplementation in Canada and the United States[1]
| Recommended FA dose and definition of NTD risk groups | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low risk | Intermediate/moderate risk | High risk | |||||
| Organization | Year | Dose, μg | Definition | Dose, μg | Definition | Dose, μg | Definition |
| US CDC ( | 1991 | — | — | — | — | 4000 | Women who have had a pregnancy resulting in an infant or fetus with an NTD |
| US Public Health Service ( | 1992 | 400 | All women of childbearing age in the United States who are capable of becoming pregnant | — | — | — | — |
| Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada ( | 1993 | 400 | Women of childbearing age and low NTD risk planning a pregnancy[ | 1000–4000 | No NTD history, but have T1D, epilepsy treatment, first-degree relative with NTD, FA antagonist use | 4000 | Previous pregnancy with NTD |
| 2003 | 400–1000 | Women of childbearing age and low NTD risk planning a pregnancy | 4000–5000 | No NTD history, but have T1D, epilepsy treatment, first-degree relative with NTD, FA antagonist use | 4000–5000 | Previous pregnancy with NTD | |
| 2007 | 400–1000 | No personal health risks, planned pregnancy, good compliance | 5000 | Epilepsy, T1D, obesity with BMI > 35 kg/m2, family history of NTD, high-risk ethnic group (e.g., Sikh); history of poor compliance with medications, variable diet, no consistent birth control, possible teratogenic substance use (alcohol, tobacco, recreational nonprescription drugs) | 5000 | Previous pregnancy with NTD or other potentially folate-responsive congenital anomaly | |
| 2015 | 400 | Women or male partners with no personal or family history of FA-sensitive birth defects | 1000–4000 | First or second family history of NTD, personal history of other folate-sensitive congenital anomalies, maternal diabetes, teratogenic medications, maternal GI malabsorption conditions | 4000 | Personal history of NTD or previous NTD pregnancy in either partner | |
| Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada ( | 1993 | — | As early as possible, women planning a pregnancy should consult physician about FA supplements | — | — | — | Previous NTD pregnancy, refer to physician |
| 1995–2018 | 400[ | All women who could become pregnant | — | Refer to health care provider | — | Refer to health care provider | |
1FA, folic acid; GI, gastrointestinal; NTD, neural tube defect; T1D, type 1 diabetes.
2Women should consider a minimum of 400 μg FA or the adequate dietary equivalent according to Canada's Food Guide to Healthy Eating.
3As part of a multivitamin containing 400 μg FA.
Pregnancy and birth health outcomes associated with FA intake[1]
| Outcomes, specific outcomes | Study type | FA dose | Timing of FA supplementation | Direction of effect | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth outcomes | |||||
| BW, LBW, SGA, preterm | Cochrane review | • No FA• FA supplements (with or without other micronutrients) | • During pregnancy (studies with periconceptional FA supplementation excluded) | No association of FA supplementation with BW or with risk of preterm birth, stillbirths/neonatal deaths, or LBW | ( |
| SGA | Meta-analysis, systematic review | • No FA (15% of women)• FA taken (85%) in dosages of either: 400 µg/d (95.5%), 5000 µg/d (3.5%), or other dosage (1%) | • Preconceptional (25.5%)• Postconceptional (74.5%) | Reduced risk of SGA if supplemented preconceptionallySGA <10th centile (adjusted OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.90; | ( |
| LBW (BW <5th centile) | Meta-analysis, systematic review | • No FA (15% of women)• FA taken (85%) in dosages of either: 400 µg/d (95.5%), 5000 µg/d (3.5%), or other dosage (1%) | • Preconceptional (25.5%)• Postconceptional (74.5%) | Preconception low-dose FA supplement:LBW adjusted OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.92; | ( |
| SGA for height, SGA for weight | Population-based multicenter cohort study | • No FA use• FA use ≤1000 µg/d• FA use >1000 µg/d | • Periconceptional (≥1 mo of FA use between 3-mo preconception and end of first trimester) | Increased risk of SGA for height for women with FA use >1000 μg/d | ( |
| Embryonic growth | Prospective cohort study | • No FA use• FA use 400 µg/d | • Periconceptional• Postconceptional | No or postconceptional FA use negatively associated with crown-rump-length and embryonic volume | ( |
| LBW, SGA | Prospective cohort study | • No FA use• FA use 400 µg/d | • Periconceptional• Preconceptional• Postconceptional | Periconceptional FA intake (until end of first trimester) associated with 20% lower risk of LBW and 10% lower SGA risk | ( |
| SGA, LGA | Prospective cohort study | 400 µg/d | • Periconceptional only• Periconceptional + second trimester• Periconceptional + third trimester• Periconceptional + second + third trimesters | FA supplement use beyond first trimester (group of periconceptional + second + third trimester FA use) associated with increased risk of LGA compared with FA supplement in periconceptional time only; RR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.21, 2.87 | ( |
| Childhood disease outcomes—asthma and allergic diseases | |||||
| Asthma | Meta-analysis, systematic review | • No FA use• FA use | • Periconceptional or first trimester• Second + third trimesters• Any trimester/throughout pregnancy | No association between first trimester FA use and risk of asthma; conflicting results for second and third trimester FA use and asthma | ( |
| Asthma and allergic disease | Review including 10 prospective cohort studies | Different doses | • Periconceptional• Preconceptional• Postconceptional | Majority of studies support no association of maternal FA intake and development of childhood asthma and allergy; limited evidence on dose-response relation between FA and risk of asthma or allergic diseases | ( |
| Asthma, wheezing, dermatitis—allergic diseases | Prospective cohort study | Median (ranges) of FA:• early pregnancy 700 µg/d (43–5500 µg/d)• late pregnancy 300 µg/d (27–5895 µg/d) | • Early pregnancy (<16 weeks of gestation)• Late pregnancy (30–34 weeks of gestation) | FA use in late pregnancy associated with 26% increased risk of asthma at 3.5 y of age, but not at 5.5 y of age; pre- and periconceptional FA use not associated with asthma risk | ( |
| Wheeze, asthma, atopic dermatitis, eczema, allergic sensitization | Prospective cohort study | • No FA use• FA use | • Periconceptional/first trimester• Throughout pregnancy• Others (e.g., third trimester only) | No association between FA use during pregnancy and increased risk of developing eczema, atopic dermatitis, allergic sensitization, wheeze, or asthma | ( |
| Childhood disease outcomes—autism | |||||
| Autism/ASD/neurodevelopment | Systematic review (22 studies) | Different doses | • Periconceptional• Preconceptional• Postconceptional | Fifteen studies showed beneficial effect, 6 studies reported no significant findings, 1 prospective cohort study reported increased risk of delayed psychomotor development in 7-y-old children of mothers who took >5000 µg/d FA during pregnancy | ( |
| ASD | Case-control study | • FA use (400 µg/d)• Multivitamin use• FA and/or multivitamin use (with FA 400 µg/d) | • Before pregnancy (i.e., 540–271 d before birth)• During pregnancy (i.e., 270 d before birth up to date of childbirth) | Lower risk of ASD in children of mothers exposed to FA and/or multivitamin supplements before and/or during pregnancy (adjusted RR: 0.27–0.56); no significant risk reduction in offspring of parents with psychiatric condition; no risk reduction if women took vitamin supplements before pregnancy for treatment of vitamin deficiency | ( |
| ASD | Case-control study | • No FA (28% of women)• FA 400 µg/d (72%) | • Periconceptional (4 wk before to 8 wk after conception) | Reduced risk of ASD (adjusted OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.90) in children (mean age 6.4 y) of mothers with periconceptional FA | ( |
| ASD | Case-control study | Total FA intake summed based on data including dose, brand, frequency of supplement, and fortified food intake | • 3 mo before pregnancy and throughout each month of pregnancy | Lower risk (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.92) of ASD in children of women who took ≥600 µg/d compared with <600 µg/d in first month of pregnancy; decreasing OR with increasing FA intake (0, ≤500, 500–<800, 800–1000, >1000 µg/d) | ( |
| Childhood disease outcomes—metabolism, insulin resistance, and obesity | |||||
| Obesity/insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) | Systematic review (5 human and 9 animal studies) | In human studies/RCTs:• No FA use• FA 400 µg/dFolate status in observational studies | During pregnancy | Inconsistent findings; animal studies showed overall protective effect of FA on obesity + insulin resistance; human studies reported decreased risk of metabolic syndrome, and higher HOMA-IR with FA supplementation, and no or a positive association between late-pregnancy maternal folate status and HOMA-IR | ( |
| HOMA-IR | Cluster RCT | • No FA• FA 400 µg/d• FA 400 µg/d + iron• FA 400 µg/d + iron + zinc• FA 400 µg/d in multimicronutrient supplement | Start of supplementation in early pregnancy | No association between maternal plasma folate concentration and HOMA-IR in 6- to 8-y-old children | ( |
| HOMA-IR | Prospective cohort study | 500 µg/d | Start of supplementation at 18 weeks of gestation | Higher maternal folate status predicted higher adiposity (fat mass and body fat percentage) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in 6-y-old children; highest HOMA-IR if mothers had high folate and low vitamin B-12 status | ( |
| Body composition | Population-based birth cohort study | • No FA use• FA use | During pregnancy: 18 and 32 weeks of gestation | No association between maternal FA supplementation during pregnancy and body composition in 9-y-old children | ( |
1ASD, autism spectrum disorder; BW, birthweight; FA, folic acid; LBW, low birthweight; LGA, large-for-gestational-age; RCT, randomized controlled trial; Ref., reference; SGA, small-for-gestational-age.
Top 5 challenges and potential solutions identified by workshop participants in aligning FA intake among women with recommendations for primary prevention of NTDs[1]
| Themes | Challenges | Solutions and potential implementation strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Need for additional evidence on the effective dose and duration to prevent NTDs | Different groups have developed different guidelines, in part due to gaps in the knowledge about the minimally effective dose and duration of supplemental FA for NTD prevention. Gaps are due to the following:- Evidence used for setting initial recommendations was derived from RCTs and observational studies that used the dose of FA in supplements commercially available at the time.- Because FA was traditionally given in a prenatal supplement combined with iron to prevent pregnancy-related anemia, FA was consumed for the entire pregnancy, which has influenced guidelines in regards to the duration of supplement use. | - Commitment from professional groups to have harmonized guidelines based on the best available evidence.- Harmonization of definitions of women at low, moderate, and high risk of an NTD-affected pregnancy.- Recommendations that do not fully align with the available evidence should be acknowledged in guidelines to ensure that recommendations based on judgment are differentiated from those based on a high(er) level of evidence. For example, it is recommended that prenatal supplements containing FA be consumed throughout pregnancy even though FA is required for the neural tube closure in the first trimester. |
| - The foundational RCT studies included women not consuming FA-fortified foods, so baseline folate status was likely different than that of the current Canadian and US populations. | ||
| - The foundational RCT studies supplemented with FA up to 12 wk only, so there is lack of evidence for additional health benefits of FA supplement intake beyond the first trimester. | ||
| - National surveys show that ∼20% of Canadian women of childbearing age do not have RBC folate values that provide maximal reduction of NTD risk (e.g., <906 nmol/L). It is known that the majority of these women are likely not supplement users and may benefit from supplement use, not necessarily a higher FA dose. These women need to be identified and characterized. | ||
| - Aboriginal and immigrant pregnant women are underrepresented in Canadian studies. | ||
| - Pregnant women living in remote areas (North or rural) have poor access to fresh fruit and vegetables (i.e., high cost, low availability) and FA-containing supplements. | ||
| - Women at moderate risk of an NTD-affected pregnancy are ill-defined. | ||
| - Because of the use of different study designs, each with its own limitations, and the lack of harmonization among analytic folate methods used to assess status across studies, it has proven difficult to consistently integrate and interpret data. | ||
| Supplement content inconsistent with recommendations | Despite the 2015 SOGC and Health Canada/Public Health Agency of Canada aligning their FA recommendations,it can be difficult for women to purchase supplements with the recommended doses due to the following:- Lack of availability of prenatal supplements containing the recommended 400 μg FA.- Health care providers prescribe a 1000-μg prenatal supplement because that is what is generally available in the marketplace, and they are hesitant to recommend something that is not available.- Insurance companies reimburse for prescribed supplements only, so women consume what their health care provider prescribes.- Individual supplement companies are reluctant to reduce the FA dose in their prenatal supplements because it may put them at a competitive disadvantage if they are not comparable with other products.- The 2015 SOGC guidelines maintain a dose range (400–1000 µg) for moderate-risk women so supplement companies are producing products that, in part, still meet the current guidelines.- Reformulation of a supplement is a significant undertaking for industry with associated costs; Canada is a smaller market. | - Education of both health care professionals and consumers on harmonized recommendations of FA to increase demand for products with the recommended dose. These efforts could benefit from the inclusion of women of childbearing age in the development of knowledge translation initiatives.- Reformulation should be encouraged industry-wide to mitigate risk to companies who are the first to align dose with recommendations.- Industry could take a stepwise approach to reformulation to allow sufficient time to transition prenatal vitamins to contain 400 μg FA.- Develop a multivitamin/mineral monograph specific for prenatal supplements that aligns the allowable FA content with the recommended dose of FA. Other nutrients of concern regarding pregnancy would also be included.- Change the maximum allowable over-the-counter dose of FA in supplements to 400 μg, resulting in doses ≥400 μg being available by prescription only. - Allow a label content claim on prenatal supplements indicating that the product contains the recommended dose of FA for NTD risk reduction. |
| - There is a perception among stakeholders that responsibility for supplement formulation belongs to another stakeholder, resulting in inaction regarding reformulation (e.g., industry is reluctant to initiate reformulation in the absence of regulatory requirement changes; health care professionals are unlikely to prescribe a dose that is not already available on the market). | ||
| - There is some concern that women who have low supplement-use compliance will not benefit from supplement formulations with lower doses. | ||
| Facilitating access to FA-containing supplement during periconception | Despite recommendations to consume an FA-containing supplement in the periconceptional period, many women do not consume the recommended dose (or supplements at all) because they have limited access to them. This can be due to the following:- Cost and access of prenatal supplements for women are variable across municipalities, regions, and provinces, especially for those living in poverty, who are food insecure, or living in remote locations.- Access to health care and family planning is uneven in Canada.- About half of pregnancies in Canada are estimated to be unplanned. | - FA-containing prenatal supplements (recommended dose) and contraception should be made available to all women (e.g., free of charge to those unable to purchase).- Clinicians and policymakers should develop an increased awareness of the social determinants of health that may influence the risk of an unplanned pregnancy, the ability to access FA-containing supplements, and the ability to adhere to FA recommendations. |
| Knowledge transfer | Whereas many health care professionals are aware of the FA recommendations, many others remain unaware, resulting in lost opportunities for ensuring that women consume the recommended amount of FA. Also, many women themselves are not aware of the recommendations.- The SOGC guidelines are the preferred source of information regarding FA for most health care professionals, but the guidelines are not accessible to everyone (e.g., need to pay for access to guidelines if not a member of SOGC).- There is a lower level of awareness of the new 2015 SOGC guidelines among medical subspecialists (e.g., family physicians, reproductive endocrinologists).- Many women of childbearing age are not aware of the recommendations for FA supplement use during pregnancy.- Vulnerable women such as those who are younger, are of certain ethnicities, or who have lower levels of education/socioeconomic status may be at the highest risk of lower folate status, due in part to food insecurity and low prevalence of supplement intake, and are also the least likely to be aware of FA recommendations. | - More education of the public and health care professionals regarding the recommended FA intake is needed. This could be facilitated by making guidelines more widely available and engaging stakeholders, including consumers, in the development of knowledge transfer activities.- A refreshed public health campaign on FA recommendations should adopt innovative marketing strategies (e.g., front-of-package messaging or coupons on sanitary products; shelf information at the point of purchase) and online social media that target all women of childbearing age, not just those planning a pregnancy.- FA recommendations could be packaged within an overall strategy targeting women about a healthy lifestyle and family planning.- Anticipatory guidance on FA and NTD, family planning, etc., should be routinely provided to all women of childbearing age at “well woman” visits (e.g., preventive care visits; pap exams).- More education of the public and health care professionals regarding the recommended FA intake is needed. This could be facilitated by making the guidelines more widely available and including them in sex education classes in public school and in the curriculum of health care professionals. |
| - Engage with health care professional bodies to promote the recommendations, including those for alternative and complementary medicine providers. | ||
| - Engage with the Canadian Prenatal Nutrition Program and those on the front lines delivering prenatal support to vulnerable women. Revisit preconception care guidelines to ensure they are aligned and up to date. | ||
| - Harmonization of definitions of women at low, moderate, and high risk of an NTD-affected pregnancy to facilitate health care professionals in recommending appropriate FA doses to women. | ||
| “More is better” attitude | Decades ago, micronutrient deficiencies were common in Canada, and the emphasis had been on ensuring nutrient adequacy in the population. However, this “more is better” attitude persists.- There is a low level of awareness that supplemental vitamin and mineral intake in high amounts may not provide additional benefit and might even cause harm. | - Messaging that “more is |
| - Take the opportunity to have pharmacists serve as “gatekeepers” regarding the appropriate FA dose for low-risk women. |
1FA, folic acid; NTD, neural tube defect; RBC, red blood cell; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SOGC, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.
Research priorities and other activities to facilitate solutions[1]
| Use existing cohorts or nationally representative survey data to: |
| - Identify the determinants of lower RBC folate status (<906 nmol/L) (e.g., not capable of becoming pregnant, do not consume FA-fortified foods, social/societal barriers to accessing FA supplements, living in remote communities, etc.). |
| - Identify the determinants of access to and use of prenatal supplements. |
| - Identify the prevalence of low, moderate, and high-risk women. |
| - Characterize the determinants of maternal FA intake. |
| - Investigate other pregnancy outcomes, other than NTDs, associated with maternal FA intake. |
| - Monitor FA intake and blood folate status of reproductive-aged women in Canada before and after reformulation of supplements. |
| - Consider other nutrients implicated in NTD risk—e.g., vitamin B-12 (currently in prenatal supplements) and choline (not in prenatal supplements)—and their potential interaction with FA intake. Additional research regarding the adequacy of maternal intake of these vitamins and health outcomes should be encouraged. |
| Evidence review to address whether there would be unintended consequences of lowering the commonly consumed supplement dose from 1000 μg FA to 400 μg |
| - e.g., would incidence of other folate-sensitive congenital anomalies change? |
| Studies of blood folate analytic methods including standard reference material to facilitate comparison across studies and populations |
| - e.g., using reference material from the National Institute of Standards and Technology. |
| Analysis of marketing methods to better understand how to reach women before conception |
| - Focus especially on those not following the FA recommendations to provide strategies to conduct targeted research projects and awareness campaigns. |
| Improve knowledge transfer and enhance education strategies for both health care professionals and the general public |
| - Perform a scoping review of knowledge and awareness of the 2015 SOGC recommendations (identify who knows about them and what they know). |
| - Develop education campaigns in collaboration with pharmacist associations in Canada and support pharmacies’ ability to transfer knowledge to women by providing accurate shelf information on FA recommendations. |
| - Modify medical, nursing, and allied health undergraduate curricula to include the importance of the recommended supplemental FA intake before and during pregnancy. |
| - Integrate notions of nutrition, biology, and human health in secondary school curricula (e.g., knowledge of FA and NTDs in sex education courses). |
1FA, folic acid; NTD, neural tube defect; RBC, red blood cell; SOGC, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.