AIMS: Left atrial (LA) enlargement predicts cardiovascular risk. The prognostic value of left atrial peak reservoir strain (LA RS) by two-dimensional speckle tracking in the general population is currently unknown. This study sought to determine the prognostic value of LA RS in the general population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 385 participants without atrial fibrillation, heart failure (HF), and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) had an echocardiogram including left ventricular and LA speckle-tracking analysis performed. LA RS was averaged from the three apical views. The endpoint was a composite of incident IHD, HF, or cardiovascular death. Median follow-up was 12.6 years (interquartile-range 11.5-12.8 years). Follow-up was 100%. Fifty-one participants (13.3%) reached the composite outcome. LA RS was a univariable predictor of outcome [hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.09-1.43; P = 0.002]. However, LA RS did not remain an independent predictor of outcome after adjustment for clinical parameters. The prognostic value was modified by sex (P = 0.011). LA RS predicted the composite outcome in women but not in men when adjusting for clinical parameters (women: HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.05-2.02; P = 0.025) (men: HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.14; P = 0.65). Further adjustment for echocardiographic parameters did not significantly alter the results. LA RS added incremental prognostic information in addition to SCORE and the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Pooled Cohort Equation in women only. CONCLUSION: LA RS is a univariable predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population. However, the prognostic value of LA RS is modified by sex. LA RS is an independent predictor of outcome in women but not in men. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Left atrial (LA) enlargement predicts cardiovascular risk. The prognostic value of left atrial peak reservoir strain (LA RS) by two-dimensional speckle tracking in the general population is currently unknown. This study sought to determine the prognostic value of LA RS in the general population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 385 participants without atrial fibrillation, heart failure (HF), and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) had an echocardiogram including left ventricular and LA speckle-tracking analysis performed. LA RS was averaged from the three apical views. The endpoint was a composite of incident IHD, HF, or cardiovascular death. Median follow-up was 12.6 years (interquartile-range 11.5-12.8 years). Follow-up was 100%. Fifty-one participants (13.3%) reached the composite outcome. LA RS was a univariable predictor of outcome [hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.09-1.43; P = 0.002]. However, LA RS did not remain an independent predictor of outcome after adjustment for clinical parameters. The prognostic value was modified by sex (P = 0.011). LA RS predicted the composite outcome in women but not in men when adjusting for clinical parameters (women: HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.05-2.02; P = 0.025) (men: HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.14; P = 0.65). Further adjustment for echocardiographic parameters did not significantly alter the results. LA RS added incremental prognostic information in addition to SCORE and the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Pooled Cohort Equation in women only. CONCLUSION: LA RS is a univariable predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population. However, the prognostic value of LA RS is modified by sex. LA RS is an independent predictor of outcome in women but not in men. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
echocardiography; general population; left atrial function; left atrial speckle tracking; left atrial strain; prognosis; risk model; risk stratification
Authors: Aseel Alfuhied; Gaurav S Gulsin; Lavanya Athithan; Emer M Brady; Kelly Parke; Joseph Henson; Emma Redman; Anna-Marie Marsh; Thomas Yates; Melanie J Davies; Gerry P McCann; Anvesha Singh Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Francesco Bandera; Anita Mollo; Matteo Frigelli; Giulia Guglielmi; Nicoletta Ventrella; Maria Concetta Pastore; Matteo Cameli; Marco Guazzi Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-01-13
Authors: Ditte Madsen Andersen; Morten Sengeløv; Flemming Javier Olsen; Jacob Louis Marott; Gorm Boje Jensen; Peter Schnohr; Elke Platz; Morten Schou; Rasmus Mogelvang; Tor Biering-Sørensen Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Flemming Javier Olsen; Søren Zöga Diederichsen; Peter Godsk Jørgensen; Magnus T Jensen; Anders Dahl; Nino Emmanuel Landler; Claus Graff; Axel Brandes; Derk Krieger; Ketil Haugan; Lars Køber; Søren Højberg; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen; Tor Biering-Sørensen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Maria Concetta Pastore; Giuseppe De Carli; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Flavio D'Ascenzi; Marta Focardi; Francesco Contorni; Sergio Mondillo; Matteo Cameli Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 4.214