Literature DB >> 30540973

A comparison of microbial fuel cell and microbial electrolysis cell biosensors for real-time environmental monitoring.

Ademola Adekunle1, Vijaya Raghavan1, Boris Tartakovsky2.   

Abstract

This study compares the biosensing performance of a microbial fuel cell (MFC) and a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC). Initial tests provided a qualitative comparison of MFC and MEC currents after the anode compartment liquid (anolyte) was spiked with acetate, or sulphates of NH4+, Na+, Mg2+, Fe2+, or a fertilizer solution. Current measurements showed that the MFC sensor had a faster response time, higher sensitivity, and faster recovery time after the spike. Following the spike tests, the MFC and MEC were operated in a continuous flow mode at several influent concentrations of acetate, and sulphates of NH4+, Na+, and Fe2+. The continuous flow tests confirmed the better performance of the MFC sensor, which was selected for further experiments. Two MFC sensors were used for real-time (on-line) COD measurements of brewery wastewater. Regression analysis showed a strong correlation between the MFC power output and COD concentrations in the anode compartment with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.97. Overall, results of this study suggest that an MFC-based sensor can be successfully used as a simple and cost-efficient real-time monitoring tool.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biosensor; Environmental monitoring; MEC; MFC; Pollutant detection; Real-time measurements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30540973     DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  4 in total

1.  Online monitoring of heavy metal-related toxicity using flow-through and floating microbial fuel cell biosensors.

Authors:  Ademola Adekunle; Carrie Rickwood; Boris Tartakovsky
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Reading the ground: Understanding the response of bioelectric microbes to anthropogenic compounds in soil based terrestrial microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Robyn A Barbato; Robert M Jones; Michael A Musty; Scott M Slone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Forward-Looking Roadmaps for Long-Term Continuous Water Quality Monitoring: Bottlenecks, Innovations, and Prospects in a Critical Review.

Authors:  Yuankai Huang; Xingyu Wang; Wenjun Xiang; Tianbao Wang; Clifford Otis; Logan Sarge; Yu Lei; Baikun Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 4.  Recent Advancements in Electrochemical Biosensors for Monitoring the Water Quality.

Authors:  Yun Hui; Zhaoling Huang; Md Eshrat E Alahi; Anindya Nag; Shilun Feng; Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.