Kathleen Ries Merikangas1, Joel Swendsen2,3, Ian B Hickie4, Lihong Cui1, Haochang Shou5, Alison K Merikangas6, Jihui Zhang7, Femke Lamers8, Ciprian Crainiceanu9, Nora D Volkow10,11, Vadim Zipunnikov9. 1. Genetic Epidemiology Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 2. University of Bordeaux, National Center for Scientific Research, Bordeaux, France. 3. EPHE PSL Research University, Paris, France. 4. Brain & Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 6. Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 7. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. 8. Department of Psychiatry and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 9. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 10. National Institute of Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland. 11. Laboratory of Neuroimaging, National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract
Importance: Biologic systems involved in the regulation of motor activity are intricately linked with other homeostatic systems such as sleep, feeding behavior, energy, and mood. Mobile monitoring technology (eg, actigraphy and ecological momentary assessment devices) allows the assessment of these multiple systems in real time. However, most clinical studies of mental disorders that use mobile devices have not focused on the dynamic associations between these systems. Objectives: To examine the directional associations among motor activity, energy, mood, and sleep using mobile monitoring in a community-identified sample, and to evaluate whether these within-day associations differ between people with a history of bipolar or other mood disorders and controls without mood disorders. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used a nested case-control design of 242 adults, a subsample of a community-based sample of adults. Probands were recruited by mail from the greater Washington, DC, metropolitan area from January 2005 to June 2013. Enrichment of the sample for mood disorders was provided by volunteers or referrals from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center or by participants in the National Institute of Mental Health Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program. The inclusion criteria were the ability to speak English, availability to participate, and consent to contact at least 2 living first-degree relatives. Data analysis was performed from June 2013 through July 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Motor activity and sleep duration data were obtained from minute-to-minute activity counts from an actigraphy device worn on the nondominant wrist for 2 weeks. Mood and energy levels were assessed by subjective analogue ratings on the ecological momentary assessment (using a personal digital assistant) by participants 4 times per day for 2 weeks. Results: Of the total 242 participants, 92 (38.1%) were men and 150 (61.9%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 48 (16.9) years. Among the participants, 54 (22.3%) had bipolar disorder (25 with bipolar I; 29 with bipolar II), 91 (37.6%) had major depressive disorder, and 97 (40.1%) were controls with no history of mood disorders. A unidirectional association was found between motor activity and subjective mood level (β = -0.018, P = .04). Bidirectional associations were observed between motor activity (β = 0.176; P = .03) and subjective energy level (β = 0.027; P = .03) as well as between motor activity (β = -0.027; P = .04) and sleep duration (β = -0.154; P = .04). Greater cross-domain reactivity was observed in bipolar disorder across all outcomes, including motor activity, sleep, mood, and energy. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that interventions focused on motor activity and energy may have greater efficacy than current approaches that target depressed mood; both active and passive tracking of multiple regulatory systems are important in designing therapeutic targets.
Importance: Biologic systems involved in the regulation of motor activity are intricately linked with other homeostatic systems such as sleep, feeding behavior, energy, and mood. Mobile monitoring technology (eg, actigraphy and ecological momentary assessment devices) allows the assessment of these multiple systems in real time. However, most clinical studies of mental disorders that use mobile devices have not focused on the dynamic associations between these systems. Objectives: To examine the directional associations among motor activity, energy, mood, and sleep using mobile monitoring in a community-identified sample, and to evaluate whether these within-day associations differ between people with a history of bipolar or other mood disorders and controls without mood disorders. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used a nested case-control design of 242 adults, a subsample of a community-based sample of adults. Probands were recruited by mail from the greater Washington, DC, metropolitan area from January 2005 to June 2013. Enrichment of the sample for mood disorders was provided by volunteers or referrals from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center or by participants in the National Institute of Mental Health Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program. The inclusion criteria were the ability to speak English, availability to participate, and consent to contact at least 2 living first-degree relatives. Data analysis was performed from June 2013 through July 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Motor activity and sleep duration data were obtained from minute-to-minute activity counts from an actigraphy device worn on the nondominant wrist for 2 weeks. Mood and energy levels were assessed by subjective analogue ratings on the ecological momentary assessment (using a personal digital assistant) by participants 4 times per day for 2 weeks. Results: Of the total 242 participants, 92 (38.1%) were men and 150 (61.9%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 48 (16.9) years. Among the participants, 54 (22.3%) had bipolar disorder (25 with bipolar I; 29 with bipolar II), 91 (37.6%) had major depressive disorder, and 97 (40.1%) were controls with no history of mood disorders. A unidirectional association was found between motor activity and subjective mood level (β = -0.018, P = .04). Bidirectional associations were observed between motor activity (β = 0.176; P = .03) and subjective energy level (β = 0.027; P = .03) as well as between motor activity (β = -0.027; P = .04) and sleep duration (β = -0.154; P = .04). Greater cross-domain reactivity was observed in bipolar disorder across all outcomes, including motor activity, sleep, mood, and energy. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that interventions focused on motor activity and energy may have greater efficacy than current approaches that target depressed mood; both active and passive tracking of multiple regulatory systems are important in designing therapeutic targets.
Authors: Frank Iorfino; Elizabeth M Scott; Joanne S Carpenter; Shane P Cross; Daniel F Hermens; Madhura Killedar; Alissa Nichles; Natalia Zmicerevska; Django White; Adam J Guastella; Jan Scott; Patrick D McGorry; Ian B Hickie Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Jai L Shah; Jan Scott; Patrick D McGorry; Shane P M Cross; Matcheri S Keshavan; Barnaby Nelson; Stephen J Wood; Steven Marwaha; Alison R Yung; Elizabeth M Scott; Dost Öngür; Philippe Conus; Chantal Henry; Ian B Hickie Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Philip R Gehrman; Arpita Ghorai; Matthew Goodman; Richard McCluskey; Holly Barilla; Laura Almasy; Till Roenneberg; Maja Bucan Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Dante Durand; Martin T Strassnig; Raeanne C Moore; Colin A Depp; Robert A Ackerman; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 4.939