Iris Lange1, Liesbet Goossens1, Jindra Bakker1, Stijn Michielse1, Ruud van Winkel1, Shmuel Lissek1, Nicole Leibold1, Machteld Marcelis1, Marieke Wichers1, Jim van Os1, Therese van Amelsvoort1, Koen Schruers1. 1. From the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands (Lange, Goossens, Bakker, Michielse, Leibold, Marcelis, van Os, van Amelsvoort, Schruers); Department of Neuroscience, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Center for Clinical Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (van Winkel); Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA (Lissek); Institute for Mental Health Care Eindhoven (GGzE), Eindhoven, The Netherlands (Marcelis); Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands (Wichers); Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, London, UK (van Os); Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (van Os); Faculty of Psychology, Center for Experimental and Learning Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Schruers).
Abstract
Background: Childhood maltreatment is a transdiagnostic risk factor for later psychopathology and has been associated with altered brain circuitry involved in the processing of threat and safety. Examining threat generalization mechanisms in young adults with childhood maltreatment and psychiatric symptoms may elucidate a pathway linking early-life adversities to the presence of subclinical psychopathology. Methods: We recruited youth aged 16–25 years with subclinical psychiatric symptomatology and healthy controls. They were dichotomized into 2 groups: 1 with a high level of childhood maltreatment (n = 58) and 1 with no or a low level of childhood maltreatment (n = 55). Participants underwent a functional MRI threat generalization paradigm, measuring self-reported fear, expectancy of an unconditioned stimulus (US) and neural responses. Results: We observed interactions between childhood maltreatment and threat generalization indices on subclinical symptom load. In individuals reporting high levels of childhood maltreatment, enhanced generalization in self-reported fear and US expectancy was related to higher levels of psychopathology. Imaging results revealed that in the group with high levels of childhood maltreatment, lower activation in the left hippocampus during threat generalization was associated with a higher symptom load. Associations between threat generalization and psychopathology were nonsignificant overall in the group with no or low levels of childhood maltreatment. Limitations: The data were acquired in a cross-sectional manner, precluding definitive insight into the causality of childhood maltreatment, threat generalization and psychopathology. Conclusion: Our results suggest that threat generalization mechanisms may moderate the link between childhood maltreatment and subclinical psychopathology during emerging adulthood. Threat generalization could represent a vulnerability factor for developing later psychopathology in individuals being exposed to childhood maltreatment.
Background: Childhood maltreatment is a transdiagnostic risk factor for later psychopathology and has been associated with altered brain circuitry involved in the processing of threat and safety. Examining threat generalization mechanisms in young adults with childhood maltreatment and psychiatric symptoms may elucidate a pathway linking early-life adversities to the presence of subclinical psychopathology. Methods: We recruited youth aged 16–25 years with subclinical psychiatric symptomatology and healthy controls. They were dichotomized into 2 groups: 1 with a high level of childhood maltreatment (n = 58) and 1 with no or a low level of childhood maltreatment (n = 55). Participants underwent a functional MRI threat generalization paradigm, measuring self-reported fear, expectancy of an unconditioned stimulus (US) and neural responses. Results: We observed interactions between childhood maltreatment and threat generalization indices on subclinical symptom load. In individuals reporting high levels of childhood maltreatment, enhanced generalization in self-reported fear and US expectancy was related to higher levels of psychopathology. Imaging results revealed that in the group with high levels of childhood maltreatment, lower activation in the left hippocampus during threat generalization was associated with a higher symptom load. Associations between threat generalization and psychopathology were nonsignificant overall in the group with no or low levels of childhood maltreatment. Limitations: The data were acquired in a cross-sectional manner, precluding definitive insight into the causality of childhood maltreatment, threat generalization and psychopathology. Conclusion: Our results suggest that threat generalization mechanisms may moderate the link between childhood maltreatment and subclinical psychopathology during emerging adulthood. Threat generalization could represent a vulnerability factor for developing later psychopathology in individuals being exposed to childhood maltreatment.
Authors: Martine van Nierop; Aleksandra Lecei; Inez Myin-Germeys; Dina Collip; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Nele Jacobs; Catherine Derom; Evert Thiery; Jim van Os; Ruud van Winkel Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2017-12-09 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Meg J Dennison; Margaret A Sheridan; Daniel S Busso; Jessica L Jenness; Matthew Peverill; Maya L Rosen; Katie A McLaughlin Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2016-11
Authors: M A Fullana; B J Harrison; C Soriano-Mas; B Vervliet; N Cardoner; A Àvila-Parcet; J Radua Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Mohammed R Milad; Gregory J Quirk; Roger K Pitman; Scott P Orr; Bruce Fischl; Scott L Rauch Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Ulrich Reininghaus; Matthew J Kempton; Lucia Valmaggia; Tom K J Craig; Philippa Garety; Adanna Onyejiaka; Charlotte Gayer-Anderson; Suzanne H So; Kathryn Hubbard; Stephanie Beards; Paola Dazzan; Carmine Pariante; Valeria Mondelli; Helen L Fisher; John G Mills; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Philip McGuire; Jim van Os; Robin M Murray; Til Wykes; Inez Myin-Germeys; Craig Morgan Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Taylor J Keding; Sara A Heyn; Justin D Russell; Xiaojin Zhu; Josh Cisler; Katie A McLaughlin; Ryan J Herringa Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2021-08-19 Impact factor: 19.242
Authors: Samuel E Cooper; Eva A M van Dis; Muriel A Hagenaars; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Charles B Nemeroff; Shmuel Lissek; Iris M Engelhard; Joseph E Dunsmoor Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 8.294
Authors: Sanne J H van Rooij; Meghna Ravi; Timothy D Ely; Vasiliki Michopoulos; Sterling J Winters; Jaemin Shin; Marie-France Marin; Mohammed R Milad; Barbara O Rothbaum; Kerry J Ressler; Tanja Jovanovic; Jennifer S Stevens Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Taylor S Campbell; Katelyn M Donoghue; Urmi Ghosh; Christina M Nelson; Tania L Roth Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Emily M Cohodes; Sahana Kribakaran; Paola Odriozola; Sarah Bakirci; Sarah McCauley; H R Hodges; Lucinda M Sisk; Sadie J Zacharek; Dylan G Gee Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 2.531
Authors: Y Stegmann; M A Schiele; D Schümann; T B Lonsdorf; P Zwanzger; M Romanos; A Reif; K Domschke; J Deckert; M Gamer; P Pauli Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 6.222