Porto Alegre, July 17, 2018.To: Ruth Guinsburg, Editor of Revista Paulista de PediatriaDear Editor,I would like to make some observations about the article “Influence of breastfeeding on
consumption of sweetened beverages or foods,” by Adriana Passanha,
published in this journal. The authors’ goal was to verify whether breastfeeding
is associated with a lower prevalence of consumption of sweetened beverages or foods
among infants. First, I commend the author and collaborators, as both breastfeeding and
food introduction are extremely important to the development of infants.
I believe that, if the authors had included the age group between zero and six
months in the analysis, it would have enriched the work. We know that exclusive
breastfeeding is recommended during this period; however, in clinical practice, the
reality is different: babies with few weeks of life are given teas, juices, and other
sweetened beverages. Since the study has a representative number of infants, including
this age group would provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of the prevalence
of consumption of sweetened beverages or foods. I also suggest adding the duration of
exclusive breastfeeding, as it might not reflect the current recommendations.
I believe that some of the data in Table 1 should have been discussed. For
instance, infants assisted by the public health system consume almost 10% more sweetened
foods or beverages that infants with private insurance, even though, currently, health
professionals of the public system have access to complete and easy-to-understand
materials about food introduction.
According to the author’s findings, the orientation for mothers on food
introduction for infants still has flaws. My question is: where are we failing as public
health professionals? We know that only imparting knowledge is not enough to change the
patient’s life.Still on the discussion, the text would be clearer if the authors started it by
addressing its main result: the prevalence of consumption of sweetened beverages and
foods. This result was only mentioned in the fifth paragraph. Before that, the authors
lingered on the prevalence of overweight in the population under study. Although very
relevant,
I believe these data should have been used to reinforce the importance of
breastfeeding and proper food introduction. However, only after discussing the main
finding. Lastly, I would have liked to read about the possibility of generalizing the
results (external validity).Dra. Lúcia Campos PellandaReceived on August 09, 2018.São Paulo, August 9, 2018.To: Dr. Lúcia Campos PellandaDear Dr. Lúcia,We would like to thank you for your interest in our work and the observations
made about our article.In answer to your questions, we chose to study only the age group corresponding
to the second semester of life because the article belongs to a doctoral
dissertation that included other studies conducted with this same population. We
agree that it is important to know about the consumption of sweetened foods and
beverages in the first semester of life, considering the early food introduction
among infants, and we can say in advance that other studies are being carried
out with infants in the age group between zero and six months.Regarding the duration of exclusive breastfeeding, the methodology used did not
allow us to obtain this information individually since the survey consisted of
closed questions (yes/no) on the feeding of infants in the previous day. This
option followed the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) on
how to carry out surveys on infant feeding practices, which indicate the
collection of information about the current feeding status through questions on
the food given to the infant in the previous 24 hours. This strategy aims to
avoid the informant’s memory bias, especially with respect to the duration of
exclusive breastfeeding.In relation to the discussion of the findings, we chose to address the influence
of breastfeeding on the consumption of sweetened foods and beverages as the main
focus of the session. Another article, at the design stage, will discuss in
greater depth the influence of other variables on the food intake of infants,
including a variable related to the location of outpatient follow-up.Regarding the prevalence of consumption of sweetened foods and beverages being
described only in the fifth paragraph, we understand the argument that such
information could be at the beginning of the session, but we chose to discuss
other aspects beforehand. Also, the reviewers, when analyzing the article, made
no remarks about this issue. Concerning external validity, we pointed out in the
discussion that the Survey on the Prevalence of Breastfeeding (Pesquisa
de Prevalência de Aleitamento Materno) was conducted with a
representative sample, which reinforces the external validity of the
findings.We thank you once more for the attention to this work and the contributions made,
which certainly invite a careful reflection on how to tackle the early offer of
sweetened foods and beverages to Brazilian children.