| Literature DB >> 30540112 |
Amanda Cristina da Silva de Jesus1, Tulio Konstantyner1, Ianna Karolina Véras Lôbo1, Josefina Aparecida Pellegrini Braga1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the socioeconomic and nutritional characteristics of children and adolescents with sickle cell anemia. DATA SOURCES: The present study is a systematic literature review based on published scientific articles. The searches were carried out using the electronic database of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health- PubMed. Two searches of articles published in the last 20years and without limitation of language were carried out. Thefirst one started from the Medical Subject Headings term "Anemia, Sickle Cell" associated with "Socioeconomic Factors"; and the second started from the term "Anemia, Sickle Cell" associated with "Anthropometry". Thesearches were directed to research conducted on humans in the age group from 0 to 18years. DATA SYNTHESIS: The final selection was composed by 11 articles on socioeconomic characteristics and 21articles on nutritional characteristics. Allstudies included children and adolescents with sickle cells disease (age range 0-18years), both genders, and most of them of black ethnicity. Families of children and adolescents with sickle cell anemia were of predominantly low socioeconomic status. Parents had lower educational levels when compared to parents of healthy children and adolescents. Body measurements (weight and height) and anthropometric indicators of children with sickle cell anemia were often lower when compared to healthy groups or reference populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30540112 PMCID: PMC6322809 DOI: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;4;00010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr ISSN: 0103-0582
Figure 1Selection process of studies on socioeconomic and nutritional characteristics of children and adolescents with sickle cell anemia (aged 0 to 18 years), 1996 to 2017.
Socioeconomic characteristics of children and adolescents (aged 0 to 18 years) with sickle cell anemia, based on studies published between 1996 and 2017.
| Author (year) | Methodology | Results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design | Sample | Place (city/state/county) | Evaluation criteria* | ||
| Fernandes etal | T | n=106 (45 ♀/61 ♂) 8-14 y | Minas Gerais, Brazil | Parental schooling (≤8 years of schooling) x̄ annual FI (in thousands of USD) by age group and home ownership | Maternal schooling (74.2%); paternal schooling (75.4%) Annual FI:8-10 (7.0); 11-14 (17.5%) Home ownership:No (68.5%) |
| Kingetal | T | n=107 SS/43 AA 5-15 y | USA | Schooling of the head of the family and annual FI (in thousands of USD) | Some schooling or more: SS (57.0%); AA (60.5%) Annual FI:SS (8.4); AA (11.0) |
| Ezenwosu etal | CC | n=90 SS/90 AA (35 ♀/55 ♂) 5-11 y | Enugu, Nigeria | SC (parental/guardians’ occupation and schooling) | SS SC: high (30%); average (23.3%); low (46.7%) AA SC: high (23.3%); average (27.8%); low (48.6%) |
| Akoduetal | T | n=80 SS/80 AA 2-15 y | Lagos, Nigeria | SL and socioeconomic stratum | SS SL: I-II (36.3%); III-IV (62.5%); V (1.2%) AA SL: I-II (51.3%); III-IV (48.7%); V (0%) SS stratum: high (36.2%); average (45%); low (18.8%) AA stratum: high (51.2%); average (38.8%); low (10%) |
| Lunaetal | T | n=160; 3-12 y | Pernambuco, Brazil | Parents’ combined educational level and FI (BMW) | Schooling: I-L (5%); IPE (56.3%); CPE (18.1%); CSE (18.1%); HE (2.5%) FI: <1 BMW (15%); 1-2 BMW (76.9%); >2 BMW (7.5%); ND (0.6%) |
| Boulet etal | T | n=192 SS/19,335 AA 0-17 y | NHIS - USA | Maternal schooling (ISE, CSE and HE), FI (below the FPI) and insurance (health insurance - Medicait/SCHIP) | SS schooling: ISE (28%); CSE (32.4%); HE (39.6%)
AA schooling: ISE (19%); CSE (33%); HE (48%)FI<FPI: SS
(47.8%); AA (34.7%); p |
| Brown etal | T | n=67 (24 ♀/43 ♂) 0-18 y | Ibadan, Nigeria | Maternal schooling | Maternal schooling: ≥SE (50.7%); <SE (49.3%) |
| Uchendu etal | CC | n=100 (♂); 6-18 y | Enugu, Nigeria | SC (parental/guardians’ occupation and schooling) | SC: high (19%); average (30%); low (51%) |
| Panepinto etal | T | n=104; 2-18 y | Wisconsin, USA | FI (in thousands of USD) | FI: >40 (21.2%); >20 to ≤40 (25%); ≤20 (34.6%); ND (19.2%) |
| Telfairetal | T | n=662 | Alabama, USA | x̄ CSI | CSI: urban (11.97); rural (13.9) |
| Singhal etal | Co | n=219 (106 ♀/113 ♂) 0-9 y | Kingston, Jamaica | x̄ SC score † | SC: ♀ (11); ♂ (12) |
T: transversal; CC: case-control; Co: cohort; y: years; SS: children with sickle cell anemia; AA: healthy children; SC: socioeconomic condition; SL: socioeconomic level; BMW: Brazilian minimum wage; x̄: average; FI: Family income; NHIS: National Health Interview Survey ; I: illiterate; L: literate (out of school); IPE: incomplete primary education; CPE: complete primary education; ISE: incomplete secondary education; CSE: complete secondary education; HE: higher education; ND: not declared; FPI: federal poverty index; Medicait/SCHIP: health care program for families with lower income in the USA; CSI: Community Stress Index (poverty, schooling, ≥ 16 years of age who cannot work, ≥ 16 years of age who are unemployed and income - scoring ranges from 1 to 18 points; stress levels are high ≥ 14, average from 9 to 13 and low from 0 to 8); †measured by the number and types of household appliances, water source and type of sanitation (scale from 1 to 18); *SC information was collected through an interview with parents or guardians.
Nutritional characteristics of children and adolescents (aged 0 to 18 years) with sickle cell anemia, based on studies published between 1996 and 2017.
| Author (year) | Methodology | Results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design | Sample | Place | Evaluation criteria | ||
| Orimadegun & Onazi (2015)25 | T | n=208 (76 ♀/132 ♂); 9 m-15 y | Zamfara, Nigeria | W (kg), BMI (kg/m²) and W/H (Z<-2) (WHO) | W=9.0±7.2; BMI=14.3±2.2; W/H=24.5% |
| Akoduetal | CC | n=50 SS/50 AA (50 ♀/50 ♂); 9 m-15 y | Lagos, Nigeria | x̄ H (cm) | H: SS 113.3/AA 115.4* |
| Salles et al. | Co | n=76 (non-apneic); x̄=9±3 y | Salvador, Brazil | x̄ H/A and BMI/A (Z/CDC) | H/A=-0.7 (-1.4/-0.1); BMI/A=-1.0 (-2.2/-0.2) |
| Akodu etal | CC | n=40 SS/40 AA; 2-15 y | Lagos, Nigeria | x̄ BMI/A (Z-WHO) | ♀ SS -1.72/AA 0.03; p<0.001; ♂ SS -1.1/AA -1.01* |
| Animasahun etal | CC | n=100 SS/100 AA; 1-10 y | Lagos, Nigeria | H (m), W (kg) and BMI (kg/m²) |
H: SS 1.13/AA 1.25 BMI: SS 14.6/AA 15.1* |
| Wali & Moheeb (2011) | CC | n=41 SS/50 AA (♂); 10-14 y | Muscat, Oman | x̄ W (kg) and H (cm) | W: SS 31.7/AA 33.6*; H: SS 142.2/AA 144.6* |
| Al-Saqladietal | T | n=102 | Aden, Yemen | x̄ H/A, W/A, W/H and BMI/A (Z-WHO) |
≤5y: H/A=-2.16; W/A=-2.17; BMI/A=-1.21 >5y: H/A=-2.24; W/A=-2.68; BMI/A=-1.84 |
| Sadarangani etal | Co | n=124 (56 ♀/68 ♂); 0-18 y | Kilifi, Kenya | Me H/A, W/A and W/H (Z-NCHS) | H/A=-1.90; W/A=-2.00; W/H=-1.50 |
| Fung etal | Co | n=80 (40 ♀/40 ♂); 4-19 y | Philadelphia, USA | H/A, W/A and BMI/A (Z-WHO) |
♀ H/A=-0.1; W/A=-0.5; BMI/A=-0.6 ♂ H/A=-0.9; W/A=-1.2; BMI/A=-0.9 |
| Koumbourlis & Lee (2007) | Co | n=45 (25 ♀/20 ♂); 10.6±3.5 | Colombia & USA | H/A, W/A and BMI/A (percentile-NCHS) | H/A=35; W/A=40; BMI/A=45 |
| Kwachaketal | Co | n=97 (53 ♀/44 ♂); 1-18 y | Philadelphia, USA | x̄ H/A, W/A and BMI/A (Z-CDC) | H/A=-0.5; W/A=-0.8; BMI/A=-0.7 |
| Zemel etal | Co | n=578 (278 ♀/300 ♂); x̄=9.1±4.7y | Philadelphia, USA | x̄ W/A, BMI/A (Z-CDC) | W/A=-0.7*; BMI/A=-0.7* |
| Buison etal | T | n=90 SS/198 AA; 4-19 y | Philadelphia, USA | x̄ H/A, W/A and BMI/A (Z-CDC) |
H/A: SS -0.46/AA 0.27;p<0.001 W/A: SS 0.80/AA 0.39;p<0.001 BMI/A: SS -0.77/AA 0.29;p<0.001 |
| Barden etal | CC | n=36 SS/30 AA; 5-18 y | Philadelphia, USA | x̄ H/A, W/A (Z-NCHS) | H/A: SS -0.4/AA 0.5;p<0.01; W/A: SS -0.8/AA 0.3; p<0.01 |
| Buchowski etal | CC | n=37 SS/23 AA; 14-18 y | Tennessee, USA | x̄ H (cm) and H (kg) |
♀ H: SS 154.4/AA 163.8*; W: SS 50.8/AA 59.2* ♂ H: SS 167.0/AA 163.8*; W: SS 55.8/AA 53.1* |
| Oredugba etal | CC | n=117 SS/122 AA; 10±4.7 y | Lagos, Nigeria | H (m) and W (kg) |
<6 y H: SS 0.94/AA 0.98*; W: SS 13.8/AA 15.6* 6-12 y H: SS 1.46/AA 1.50*; W: SS 31.0/AA 35.3* >12 y H: SS 1.64/AA 1.62*; W: SS 47.2/AA 55.1;p<0.01 |
| Singhal etal | CC | n=41 SS/31 AA; 3-6 y | Kingston, Jamaica | x̄ H (cm), W (kg), BMI (kg/m²) |
♀ H: SS 107.9/AA 109.8*; W: SS 16.6/AA 17.6* BMI: SS 14.2/AA 14.5* ♂ H: SS 105.8/AA 107.9*; W: SS 16.3/AA 17.2* BMI: SS 14.5/AA 14.7* |
| Cipolotti etal | T | n=76 (42 ♀/34 ♂) | Sergipe, Brazil | x̄ H/A and W/A (Z-NCHS) | <15 y H/A-W/A=NCHS*; ≥15 y H/A-W/A <NCHS (95%CI) |
| Thomasetal | Co | n=315; 0-18 y | Kingston, Jamaica | x̄ H/A and W/A (Z-NCHS) |
♀ H/A=-1.4; W/A=-1.7 ♂ H/A=-1.7; W/A=-1.7 |
| Kopp-Hoolihan etal | T | n=8 (3 ♀/5 ♂); 11-18 y | California, USA | x̄ H/A, W/A (Z-NCHS) and BMI | E/I=-1.5; W/A=1.3; BMI/A=17.9 |
| Soliman etal | CC | n=162 | Muscat, Oman | H/A=-1.52; BMI=14.6 | H/A=-1.52; BMI=14.6 |
T: transversal; CC: case-control; Co: cohort; m: XXXXX; y: years; x̄: mean; Me: median; W: weight; H: height; A: age (months); BMI: body mass index; Z: z score; SS: children with sickle cell anemia; AA: healthy children; WHO: World Health Organization; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; NCHS: National Center for Health Statistics; *p>0.05; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.