| Literature DB >> 30539098 |
Konstantina Intziegianni1, Michael Cassel1, Gerrit Hain1, Frank Mayer1.
Abstract
The Achilles tendon (AT) is larger and stiffer in males compared to females. AT stiffness is determined by length differences during loading. However, as some collagen fibres run transversely, changes in cross-sectional area (CSA) are also expected. The study investigates the gender differences of AT-CSA during maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Fifteen males and fifteen females were positioned prone on the isokinetic dynamometer with knee extended and ankle flexed 90°. AT-CSA [mm 2 ] from rest to MVIC during plantar flexion was sonographically assessed. AT-CSA maximal deformation [mm 2 ] was subtracted by CSA MVIC -CSA rest . AT-CSA compliance [mm 2 /Nm] and strain [%] were calculated by dividing the CSA deformation [mm 2 ] by peak torque [Nm] and CSA at rest [mm 2 ], respectively. Gender differences were assessed by an independent sample t-test with Bonferroni correction (α=0.01). AT-CSA dimensions at rest (p=0.001) and contraction (p=0.001) as well peak torque (p=0.001) were statistically significant higher in males (54.4±5.1 mm 2 , 53.7±5.1 mm 2 , 120.1±26.8 Nm) compared to females (46.2±7.0 mm 2 , 43.4±6.9 mm 2 , 86.9±21.6 Nm). AT-CSA deformation (p=0.000) strain (p=0.000) and compliance (p=0.000) were found to be statistically significant higher in females (-2.8±0.9 mm 2 , -6.2±2.0%, -0.033±0.018 mm 2 /Nm) compared to males (-0.8±1.8 mm 2 , -1.4±3.3%, -0.007±0.008 mm 2 /Nm). During loading, the AT also deforms at the transverse level by reducing its CSA. CSA reduction was higher in females, indicating also higher CSA compliance compared to males. Higher CSA compliance might indicate higher adaptability towards loading and might be discussed as a protective factor.Entities:
Keywords: Achilles tendon; compliance; cross-sectional area; gender; reliability; strain
Year: 2017 PMID: 30539098 PMCID: PMC6226073 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-113814
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Med Int Open ISSN: 2367-1890
Table 1 Anthropometric characteristics of participants.
| Variables | Females (N=15) | Males (N=15) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age [yr] | 28±3 | 30±4 | 0.063 |
| Height [cm] | 167±5 | 182±7 | 0.000* |
| Weight [kg] | 62±8 | 81±7 | 0.000* |
Values are means±SD and depict group average of data. * Significant group differences (P≤0.01)
Fig. 1Participants position on the isokinetic dynamometer and probe placement by the investigator over the region of interest.
Table 2 Reliability of assessing Achilles tendon cross-sectional area (CSA) at rest and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC).
| Intra-rater | Inter-rater | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=42 (24 females; 18 males) | ICC [2,1] | TRV [%] | Bias±LoA [mm 2 ] | SEM [mm 2 ] | ICC [2,1] | IRV [%] | Bias±LoA [mm 2 ] | SEM [mm 2 ] |
| CSA at rest [mm 2 ] | 0.94 | 4±4 | –1±5 | 2 | 0.84 | 8±4 | 3±7 | 3 |
| CSA at MVIC [mm 2 ] | 0.95 | 4±3 | –1±2 | 2 | 0.87 | 6±4 | 2±7 | 3 |
Measures of reliability: ICC=Intraclass correlation coefficient, TRV/IRV=test-retest/inter-rater variability, Bias±LoA=95% limits of agreement, SEM=standard error of measurement
Fig. 2Achilles tendon Cross-sectional area (CSA) at rest (a, c) and under maximal voluntary isometric contraction (b, d). The white dotted lines outline the tendinous structure defining the CSA.
Table 3 Achilles tendon cross-sectional area (CSA) properties and peak torque between males and females.
| Variables | Males | Females | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSA at rest [mm 2 ] | 54.4±5.1 | 46.2±7.0 | 0.001* |
| CSA at contraction [mm 2 ] | 53.7±5.1 | 43.4±6.9 | 0.000* |
| CSA deformation [mm 2 ] | –0.9±1.8 | –2.8±0.9 | 0.000* |
| Peak torque[Nm] | 120.1±26.8 | 86.9±21.6 | 0.001* |
| CSA strain [%] | –1.4±3.3 | –6.2±2.0 | 0.000* |
| CSA compliance [mm 2 /Nm] | –0.007±0.008 | –0.033±0.018 | 0.000* |
Values are means±SD and depict group average of data. *Significant group differences (P≤0.01)