| Literature DB >> 30538713 |
Mayada Sabra1,2, Amal Aboulnasr2, Philipp Franken1, Erica Perreca3, Louwrance Peter Wright3, Iris Camehl1.
Abstract
How interactions between plants, the rhizosphere, and contaminated sEntities:
Keywords: Ocimum basilicum; Piriformospora indica; Rhizophagus irregularis; Serendipita indica; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; heavy metal; soil pollution
Year: 2018 PMID: 30538713 PMCID: PMC6277477 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Overview of treatments.
| Microorganisms | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mock | AM | ||||
| Soil without heavy metals | x | x | x | x | |
| Pb | x | x | x | x | |
| Cu | x | x | x | x | |
| Cu and Pb | x | x | x | x | |
FIGURE 1Colonization of sweet basil roots with Rhizophagus irregularis and Serendipita indica after 5 weeks of inoculation. (A) Histological section of a mycorrhizal sweet basil root stained with acridine red, acriflavine and astra blue. The arrow indicates cells with arbuscules. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) Mycorrhizal colonization in %. Gray bars indicate sweet basil plants only inoculated with the AM fungus R. irregularis while black bars indicate plants inoculated with both, R. irregularis and S. indica. Data show means of three individual plants and ten 1 cm root segments per plant with standard error. Bars topped by the same letter do not differ significantly at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test (see Supplementary Table S1), where all factors do interact, calculating heavy metal treatment as one factor. (C) Qualitative detection of S. indica in sweet basil roots with PCR, using the ITS gene of S. indica. Representative samples are shown, which are either inoculated with R. irregularis or S. indica.
FIGURE 2(A) Representative sweet basil plants inoculated with different fungi growing in uncontaminated soil. (B) Sweet basil shoot and (C) root dry weight after 5 weeks inoculation with the AM fungus R. irregularis, with S. indica, and with both fungi under different heavy metal treatments. Gray bars indicate non-inoculated sweet basil plants (control), black bars indicate plants inoculated only with S. indica, dashed gray bars indicate plants inoculated only with R. irregularis, and dashed black bars indicate plants inoculated with both fungi. Bars represent the mean out of nine individual plants with standard error. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to the respective non-inoculated control at the different heavy metal treatment according to Tukey’s HSD test (see Supplementary Table S2), ∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.001.
FIGURE 3P uptake (P content × dry weight) in sweet basil shoots 5 weeks after inoculation with the AM fungus R. irregularis, with S. indica, and with both fungi under different heavy metal treatments. Bars are patterned as described for Figure 2. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to the respective non-inoculated control at the different heavy metal treatment according to Tukey’s HSD test (see Supplementary Table S3), ∗p ≤ 0.05
FIGURE 4Lead (Pb) and copper (Cu) concentration in sweet basil roots and shoots 5 weeks after inoculation with the AM fungus R. irregularis, with S. indica and with both fungi under different heavy metal treatments. (A) Pb concentration in shoots and roots which grow on soil contaminated with Pb and both heavy metals, respectively. (B) Cu concentration in shoots and roots which grow on soil contaminated with Cu and both heavy metals, respectively. Bars are patterned as described for Figure 2 and represent the mean out of three plants with standard error. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to the respective non-inoculated control at the different heavy metal treatments according to Tukey’s HSD test (see Supplementary Tables S4, S5), ∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.001.
FIGURE 5Essential oil concentration in sweet basil shoots 5 weeks after inoculation with the AM fungus R. irregularis, with S. indica and with both fungi under different heavy metal treatments. (A) Linalool concentration, (B) Eugenol concentration, (C) Eucalyptol concentration, (D) Methyl chavicol concentration. Bars are patterned as described for Figure 2 and represent the mean out of three plants with standard error. Letters indicate a significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test where all factors do interact. Asterisks indicate a significant difference compared to the respective non-inoculated control at the different heavy metal treatments according to Tukey’s HSD test (see Supplementary Tables S6, S7), ∗p ≤ 0.05.