Literature DB >> 30538133

Systematic deletions in the cellobiohydrolase (CBH) Cel7A from the fungus Trichoderma reesei reveal flexible loops critical for CBH activity.

Corinna Schiano-di-Cola1, Nanna Røjel1, Kenneth Jensen2, Jeppe Kari1, Trine Holst Sørensen1, Kim Borch2, Peter Westh3.   

Abstract

Glycoside hydrolase family 7 (GH7) cellulases are some of the most efficient degraders of cellulose, making them particularly relevant for industries seeking to produce renewable fuels from lignocellulosic biomass. The secretome of the cellulolytic model fungus Trichoderma reesei contains two GH7s, termed TrCel7A and TrCel7B. Despite having high structural and sequence similarities, the two enzymes are functionally quite different. TrCel7A is an exolytic, processive cellobiohydrolase (CBH), with high activity on crystalline cellulose, whereas TrCel7B is an endoglucanase (EG) with a preference for more amorphous cellulose. At the structural level, these functional differences are usually ascribed to the flexible loops that cover the substrate-binding areas. TrCel7A has an extensive tunnel created by eight peripheral loops, and the absence of four of these loops in TrCel7B makes its catalytic domain a more open cleft. To investigate the structure-function relationships of these loops, here we produced and kinetically characterized several variants in which four loops unique to TrCel7A were individually deleted to resemble the arrangement in the TrCel7B structure. Analysis of a range of kinetic parameters consistently indicated that the B2 loop, covering the substrate-binding subsites -3 and -4 in TrCel7A, was a key determinant for the difference in CBH- or EG-like behavior between TrCel7A and TrCel7B. Conversely, the B3 and B4 loops, located closer to the catalytic site in TrCel7A, were less important for these activities. We surmise that these results could be useful both in further mechanistic investigations and for guiding engineering efforts of this industrially important enzyme family.
© 2019 Schiano-di-Cola et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cel7A; Cel7B; Trichoderma reesei; cellobiohydrolase; cellulase; cellulose; endoglucanase; enzyme kinetics; loop engineering; protein engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30538133      PMCID: PMC6369288          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  45 in total

1.  Product binding varies dramatically between processive and nonprocessive cellulase enzymes.

Authors:  Lintao Bu; Mark R Nimlos; Michael R Shirts; Jerry Ståhlberg; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 A long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei.

Authors:  C Divne; J Ståhlberg; T T Teeri; T A Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-01-16       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Reversibility of substrate adsorption for the cellulases Cel7A, Cel6A, and Cel7B from Hypocrea jecorina.

Authors:  Vanessa O A Pellegrini; Nina Lei; Madhuri Kyasaram; Johan P Olsen; Silke F Badino; Michael S Windahl; Francieli Colussi; Nicolaj Cruys-Bagger; Kim Borch; Peter Westh
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.882

4.  Homology between cellulase genes of Trichoderma reesei: complete nucleotide sequence of the endoglucanase I gene.

Authors:  M Penttilä; P Lehtovaara; H Nevalainen; R Bhikhabhai; J Knowles
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Michaelis-Menten equation for degradation of insoluble substrate.

Authors:  Morten Andersen; Jeppe Kari; Kim Borch; Peter Westh
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  Kinetics of cellobiohydrolase (Cel7A) variants with lowered substrate affinity.

Authors:  Jeppe Kari; Johan Olsen; Kim Borch; Nicolaj Cruys-Bagger; Kenneth Jensen; Peter Westh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei.

Authors:  C Divne; J Ståhlberg; T Reinikainen; L Ruohonen; G Pettersson; J K Knowles; T T Teeri; T A Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Binding site dynamics and aromatic-carbohydrate interactions in processive and non-processive family 7 glycoside hydrolases.

Authors:  Courtney B Taylor; Christina M Payne; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Clare McCabe; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Biochemical and Structural Characterizations of Two Dictyostelium Cellobiohydrolases from the Amoebozoa Kingdom Reveal a High Level of Conservation between Distant Phylogenetic Trees of Life.

Authors:  Sarah E Hobdey; Brandon C Knott; Majid Haddad Momeni; Larry E Taylor; Anna S Borisova; Kara K Podkaminer; Todd A VanderWall; Michael E Himmel; Stephen R Decker; Gregg T Beckham; Jerry Ståhlberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Structural, biochemical, and computational characterization of the glycoside hydrolase family 7 cellobiohydrolase of the tree-killing fungus Heterobasidion irregulare.

Authors:  Majid Haddad Momeni; Christina M Payne; Henrik Hansson; Nils Egil Mikkelsen; Jesper Svedberg; Åke Engström; Mats Sandgren; Gregg T Beckham; Jerry Ståhlberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  10 in total

1.  New thermostable endoglucanase from Spirochaeta thermophila and its mutants with altered substrate preferences.

Authors:  Veera Hämäläinen; Juan De Dios Barajas-López; Yana Berlina; Rafael Álvarez-Rafael; Klara Birikh
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Substrate binding in the processive cellulase Cel7A: Transition state of complexation and roles of conserved tryptophan residues.

Authors:  Nanna Røjel; Jeppe Kari; Trine Holst Sørensen; Silke F Badino; J Preben Morth; Kay Schaller; Ana Mafalda Cavaleiro; Kim Borch; Peter Westh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Removal of N-linked glycans in cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Trichoderma reesei reveals higher activity and binding affinity on crystalline cellulose.

Authors:  Bartłomiej M Kołaczkowski; Kay S Schaller; Trine Holst Sørensen; Günther H J Peters; Kenneth Jensen; Kristian B R M Krogh; Peter Westh
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Activity of fungal β-glucosidases on cellulose.

Authors:  Malene B Keller; Trine H Sørensen; Kristian B R M Krogh; Mark Wogulis; Kim Borch; Peter Westh
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  The dissociation mechanism of processive cellulases.

Authors:  Josh V Vermaas; Riin Kont; Gregg T Beckham; Michael F Crowley; Mikael Gudmundsson; Mats Sandgren; Jerry Ståhlberg; Priit Väljamäe; Brandon C Knott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Computing Cellulase Kinetics with a Two-Domain Linear Interaction Energy Approach.

Authors:  Kay S Schaller; Jeppe Kari; Gustavo A Molina; Kasper D Tidemand; Kim Borch; Günther H J Peters; Peter Westh
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  Efficient biomass saccharification using a novel cellobiohydrolase from Clostridium clariflavum for utilization in biofuel industry.

Authors:  Asma Zafar; Muhammad Nauman Aftab; Anam Asif; Ahmet Karadag; Liangcai Peng; Hassan Ufak Celebioglu; Muhammad Sohail Afzal; Attia Hamid; Irfana Iqbal
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.361

8.  Enzyme Synergy in Transient Clusters of Endo- and Exocellulase Enables a Multilayer Mode of Processive Depolymerization of Cellulose.

Authors:  Krisztina Zajki-Zechmeister; Manuel Eibinger; Bernd Nidetzky
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 13.700

Review 9.  Engineering Robust Cellulases for Tailored Lignocellulosic Degradation Cocktails.

Authors:  Francisca Contreras; Subrata Pramanik; Aleksandra M Rozhkova; Ivan N Zorov; Olga Korotkova; Arkady P Sinitsyn; Ulrich Schwaneberg; Mehdi D Davari
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Enzymatic processing of lignocellulosic biomass: principles, recent advances and perspectives.

Authors:  Heidi Østby; Line Degn Hansen; Svein J Horn; Vincent G H Eijsink; Anikó Várnai
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.346

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.