Literature DB >> 30537721

Comparison of Pure-Tone Average Methods for Estimation of Hearing Loss Caused by Environmental Exposure to Lead and Cadmium: Does the Pure-Tone Average Method Which Uses Low-Frequency Ranges Underestimate the Actual Hearing Loss Caused by Environmental Lead and Cadmium Exposure?

Da-An Huh1, Yun-Hee Choi2, Myung Sun Ji3, Kyong Whan Moon4, Seok J Yoon5, Jong-Ryeul Sohn5.   

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that exposure to lead and cadmium can damage the inner ear receptor, which perceives high-frequency sounds. However, few studies have used the pure-tone average (PTA), including high-frequency ranges, for the estimation of hearing loss caused by lead and cadmium exposure. We estimated hearing loss using the PTA test, in low-frequency, speech frequency, and high-frequency ranges and compared the differences in the results using 3 PTA calculation methods. We analyzed the data of 2,387 participants, between the ages of 19 and 85 years, that were obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) of 2010-2012. A dose-response relationship between hearing loss and heavy metal exposure was observed in the high-frequency method after adjustment for confounding factors. When using the high-frequency PTA, it was found that doubling of the levels of lead and cadmium in the blood was associated with a 1.88- (95% CI 1.11-3.17) and 1.89-fold (95% CI 1.02-3.50) increase in the OR for hearing loss. In the case of the low-frequency and speech frequency PTA, however, there were no significant relationships between hearing loss and the concentrations of lead and cadmium in the blood. The outcomes of the present study suggest that the estimation of hearing loss caused by environmental exposure to lead and cadmium is affected by the frequencies used in the PTA calculation.
© 2018 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cadmium; Hearing; Lead; Pure-tone average

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30537721      PMCID: PMC6425850          DOI: 10.1159/000494049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  20 in total

1.  Recommendations for presenting analyses of effect modification and interaction.

Authors:  Mirjam J Knol; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  The association between low levels of lead in blood and occupational noise-induced hearing loss in steel workers.

Authors:  Yaw-Huei Hwang; Han-Yueh Chiang; Mei-Chu Yen-Jean; Jung-Der Wang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Hearing loss and heavy metal toxicity in a Nicaraguan mining community: audiological results and case reports.

Authors:  J E Saunders; B G Jastrzembski; J C Buckey; D Enriquez; T A MacKenzie; M R Karagas
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 4.  Health effects of cadmium exposure--a review of the literature and a risk estimate.

Authors:  L Järup; M Berglund; C G Elinder; G Nordberg; M Vahter
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.024

5.  Effects of acute lead acetate exposure on adult guinea pigs: electrophysiological study of the inner ear.

Authors:  K Yamamura; K Terayama; N Yamamoto; A Kohyama; R Kishi
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1989-10

6.  A case-control study on the relationship of hearing function and blood concentrations of lead, manganese, arsenic, and selenium.

Authors:  Hung-Yi Chuang; Ching-Hsia Kuo; Yu-Wen Chiu; Chi-Kung Ho; Chiu-Jung Chen; Trong-Neng Wu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Lead exposure during development results in increased neurofilament phosphorylation, neuritic beading, and temporal processing deficits within the murine auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Linda G Jones; John Prins; Sunyoung Park; Joseph P Walton; Anne E Luebke; Diana I Lurie
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 8.  The epidemiology of lead toxicity in adults: measuring dose and consideration of other methodologic issues.

Authors:  Howard Hu; Regina Shih; Stephen Rothenberg; Brian S Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  The Effects of Earphone Use and Environmental Lead Exposure on Hearing Loss in the Korean Population: Data Analysis of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2010-2013.

Authors:  Da-An Huh; Yun-Hee Choi; Kyong Whan Moon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The protective mechanism of antioxidants in cadmium-induced ototoxicity in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Su-Jin Kim; Hyun-Ja Jeong; Noh-Yil Myung; Min-chol Kim; Jeong-Han Lee; Hong-seob So; Rae-Kil Park; Hyung-Min Kim; Jae-Young Um; Seung-Heon Hong
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  HiRes Ultra Series Recall: Failure Rates and Revision Speech Recognition Outcomes.

Authors:  Nathan R Lindquist; Nathan D Cass; Ankita Patro; Elizabeth L Perkins; René H Gifford; David S Haynes; Jourdan T Holder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

2.  Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Size and Location Do not Correlate With the Severity of Hearing Loss at Initial Presentation.

Authors:  Alyssa Brown; Samuel Early; Sasa Vasilijic; Konstantina M Stankovic
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Accelerated Long-Term Hearing Loss Progression After Recovery From Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Samuel Early; Jens C van der Valk; Johan H M Frijns; Konstantina M Stankovic
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.