Caroline K Geiger1,2, Ashley M Kranz3, Andrew W Dick4, Erin Duffy5, Mark Sorbero1, Bradley D Stein1,6. 1. RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Harvard University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 3. RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia. 4. RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, California. 6. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Integrating oral health care into primary care has been promoted as a strategy to increase delivery of preventive oral health services (POHS) to young children, particularly in rural areas where few dentists practice. Using a multistate sample of Medicaid claims, we examined a child's odds of receiving POHS in a medical office by county rurality. METHODS: We used 2012-2014 Medicaid Analytic extract claims data for 6,275,456 children younger than 6 years in 39 states that allowed Medicaid payment for POHS in medical offices. We used county-level characteristics from the Area Health Resources Files, including a 3-level measure of county rurality. We used logistic regression to estimate a child's odds of receiving POHS in a medical office by county rurality, while controlling for other patient and county characteristics. FINDINGS: POHS in medical offices were received by 7.8% of children. Rates of POHS in medical offices were higher in metropolitan (metro) counties (8.4%) than nonmetro adjacent to metro (5.8%) and nonmetro not adjacent to metro (4.3%). In adjusted analysis, children living in nonmetro not adjacent to metro (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.99) and adjacent to metro counties (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.82) were significantly less likely to receive POHS in medical offices than children living in metro counties. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of POHS in medical offices among young Medicaid-enrolled children, we found POHS rates were lowest in nonmetro counties. Given barriers to dental care in rural areas, states should take additional steps beyond allowing Medicaid reimbursement to increase delivery of POHS in medical offices.
PURPOSE: Integrating oral health care into primary care has been promoted as a strategy to increase delivery of preventive oral health services (POHS) to young children, particularly in rural areas where few dentists practice. Using a multistate sample of Medicaid claims, we examined a child's odds of receiving POHS in a medical office by county rurality. METHODS: We used 2012-2014 Medicaid Analytic extract claims data for 6,275,456 children younger than 6 years in 39 states that allowed Medicaid payment for POHS in medical offices. We used county-level characteristics from the Area Health Resources Files, including a 3-level measure of county rurality. We used logistic regression to estimate a child's odds of receiving POHS in a medical office by county rurality, while controlling for other patient and county characteristics. FINDINGS: POHS in medical offices were received by 7.8% of children. Rates of POHS in medical offices were higher in metropolitan (metro) counties (8.4%) than nonmetro adjacent to metro (5.8%) and nonmetro not adjacent to metro (4.3%). In adjusted analysis, children living in nonmetro not adjacent to metro (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.99) and adjacent to metro counties (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.82) were significantly less likely to receive POHS in medical offices than children living in metro counties. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of POHS in medical offices among young Medicaid-enrolled children, we found POHS rates were lowest in nonmetro counties. Given barriers to dental care in rural areas, states should take additional steps beyond allowing Medicaid reimbursement to increase delivery of POHS in medical offices.
Authors: Hannah L Maxey; Connor W Norwood; Sierra X Vaughn; Yumin Wang; Stacie Marsh; John Williams Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 1.821
Authors: R Gary Rozier; Sally C Stearns; Bhavna T Pahel; Rocio B Quinonez; Jeongyoung Park Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Huong Luu; Svetla Slavova; Patricia R Freeman; Michelle Lofwall; Steven Browning; Heather Bush Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Stella M Yu; Hilary A Bellamy; Michael D Kogan; Jennifer L Dunbar; Renee H Schwalberg; Mark A Schuster Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jill Boylston Herndon; Scott L Tomar; Frank A Catalanotto; W Bruce Vogel; Elizabeth A Shenkman Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ashley M Kranz; Sarah L Goff; Andrew W Dick; Christopher Whaley; Kimberley H Geissler Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2022-04-03 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: Ashley M Kranz; Grace Gahlon; Andrew W Dick; Sarah L Goff; Christopher Whaley; Kimberley H Geissler Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Ashley M Kranz; Rachel Ross; Mark Sorbero; Aaron Kofner; Bradley D Stein; Andrew W Dick Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Evan V Goldstein; Andrew W Dick; Rachel Ross; Bradley D Stein; Ashley M Kranz Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 2.258