Literature DB >> 30536759

Compositional elucidation of heavy petroleum base oil by GC × GC-EI/PI/CI/FI-TOFMS.

Anupam Giri1, Marion Coutriade2, Amandine Racaud2, Pierre-Hugues Stefanuto3, Koji Okuda4, John Dane4, Robert B Cody4, Jean-François Focant3.   

Abstract

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC × GC) coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry is a powerful separation tool for complex petroleum product analysis. However, the most commonly used electron ionization (EI) technique often makes the identification of the majority of hydrocarbons impossible due to the exhaustive fragmentation and lack of molecular ion preservation, prompting the need of soft-ionization energies. In this study, three different soft-ionization techniques including photo ionization (PI), chemical ionization (CI), and field ionization (FI) were compared against EI to elucidate their relative capabilities to reveal different base oil hydrocarbon classes. Compared with EI (70 eV), PI (10.8 eV) retained significant molecular ion (M+· ) information for a large number of isomeric species including branched-alkanes and saturated monocyclic hydrocarbons along with unique fragmentation patterns. However, for bicyclic/polycyclic naphthenic and aromatic compounds, EI played upper hand by retaining molecular as well as fragment ions to identify the species, whereas PI exhibited mainly molecular ion signals. On the other hand, CI revealed selectivity towards different base oil groups, particularly for steranes, sulfur-containing thiophenes, and esters, yielding protonated molecular ions (M + H)+ for unsaturated and hydride abstracted ions (M-H+ ) for saturated hydrocarbons. FI, as expected, generated intact molecular ions (M+· ) irrespective to the base oil chemical classes. It allowed elemental composition by TOFMS with a mass resolving power up to 8000 (FWHM) and a mass accuracy of 1 mDa, leading to the calculation of heteroatomic content, double bond equivalency, and carbon number of the compounds. The qualitative and quantitative results presented herein offer a unique perspective into the detailed comparison of different ionization techniques corresponding to several hydrocarbon classes.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  base oil; chemical ionization; field ionization; hydrocarbons; ion source; mass spectrometry; photo ionization

Year:  2019        PMID: 30536759     DOI: 10.1002/jms.4319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1076-5174            Impact factor:   1.982


  5 in total

1.  Compositional Analysis of Heavy Petroleum Distillates by Comprehensive Two-dimensional Gas Chromatography, Field Ionization and High-resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Kuangnan Qian; Frank C Wang
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  From the discovery of field ionization to field desorption and liquid injection field desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry-A journey from principles and applications to a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Jürgen H Gross
Journal:  Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester)       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.067

3.  Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatographic and Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Lipid-Rich Biological Matrices-Application to Human Cerumen (Earwax).

Authors:  Allix M Coon; A John Dane; Gavin Setzen; Robert B Cody; Rabi A Musah
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry-Based Structural Elucidation Techniques.

Authors:  Xin Ma
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Multimodal combination of GC × GC-HRTOFMS and SIFT-MS for asthma phenotyping using exhaled breath.

Authors:  Pierre-Hugues Stefanuto; Delphine Zanella; Joeri Vercammen; Monique Henket; Florence Schleich; Renaud Louis; Jean-François Focant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.